For someone at the OPs level, I'd not recommend a site with such a bad reputation. He won't know if what he is reading is correct. While that site may be improved as of late, why start learning at such a poorly regarded source. There are much more reputable places to learn the basics.
Csstricks.com Moz sites Html5doctor On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:43 AM Karl DeSaulniers <k...@designdrumm.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 11, 2015, at 2:02 AM, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fi> > wrote: > > > 2015-01-11, 9:48, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > > >> I would suggest a little trip to WC3. > > > > I wonder what that means. > > it means study time > > > > >> See here: > >> http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_background.asp > > > > The w3schools site, unreliable and with rather low information/noise > ratio, intentionally wants to be confused with the Word Wide Web > Consortium, W3C. Please do not contribute to this confusion. > > Matter of opinion Yucca, but I hear ya. For the level christopher is at it > will do just fine getting him in line with how things on a basic level work. > Did not mean to add to the confusion of W3Schools being WC3 itself. > > @Christopher, don't confuse W3Schools with WC3... Ok? They are not the > same. One is lucifer and the other is God. > > There I uncontributed. > > > > > The W3C material on CSS is as authoritative as you can get in the area > of CSS, but it’s mostly not suitable for use as tutorials. The Mozilla > Development Network material > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS > > and there you have it! a real contribution. > > > is much more suitable as learning material. And it links to W3C > material, so that you can check it too, after learning the basics and > getting an idea of how various CSS features are used. > > > >> I would suggest you google every css attribute you can so you > familiarize yourself with it before using. > > > > There are no attributes in CSS. Googling every CSS property (which is > what you are probably referring to) would be rather pointless. There are > about 1,000 different properties in CSS specifications, drafts, and > browser-specific documentation. > > Yes. sorry not attributes, properties and NO don't go read them all that > would be silly. That should read ... every css proplerty you need to so > you... > > There. better? I'm trying here Yucca I really am man. Thank God for your > technicalities! We all would be lost without them. :) > > > > > Yucca > > > Karl DeSaulniers > Design Drumm > http://designdrumm.com > > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
