Big question: Why can 1 substation cripple S.F?

by Julie Chao, Erin McCormick, Elizabeth Fernandez and Anastasia
Hendrix -- George Raine, Larry D. Hatfield and Seth Rosenfeld of The
Examiner staff contributed to this report

San Francisco Examiner, December 9, 1998

     The California Public Utilities Commission and the state's
newly formed grid-operating Independent System Operator say they
will be looking into the electrical failure that darkened San
Francisco and much of San Mateo County for more than six hours
Tuesday.
     The massive failure, which could cost PG&E millions of
dollars in damages because of expected claims, drew complaints
from the Board of Supervisors and criticism of the PG&E's
management at a time when the utility industry is dramatically
changing.
     "I think the larger lesson here is: What's going on with
this company?"  said Nettie Hoge, director of the nonprofit
consumer group The Utility Rate Network.
     The power failure was caused, PG&E said, by simple human
error, but it threw the northern Peninsula into chaos and
highlighted the vulnerability of The City's power grid and our
high-tech life.
     E-mail, voicemail, answering machines, faxes and coffee
makers all went dead thanks to a PG&E worker who forgot to do
something elementary: remove a grounding wire before restarting
the power.
     "Grounding is a pretty basic procedure,"  said Carl
Bellone, PG&E's director of distribution operations.
     "It's as basic as it gets."
     Because of the error, 435,481 PG&E customers - or about a
million and a half people - lost power for anywhere from two to
seven hours in San Francisco and San Mateo County.  San Francisco
resident Sarah Killgore, 75, was killed by a hit-and-run driver
who didn't stop at an intersection that had no working traffic
light.
     As of Wednesday morning, PG&E had no information on the
number of claims filed or the amount of damages sought.
Spokesman Cory Warren said,  "It's company policy to settle
claims promptly and fairly."
     Hoge cited a litany of recent PG&E problems, including a
blackout sparked by someone who tampered with the controls in a
Mission Street electricity substation last year and a 1997 jury
decision that the company bore responsibility for a 500-acre
forest fire in the Sierra.
     "This ought to be strike three,"  Hoge said.  "You can't
blame an act of God."
     She said she didn't believe Tuesday's blackout was the
fault of the recent electric industry deregulation, but was
simply an example of bad management.
     "This may have been human error, but who was supervising
the human?"  she said.
     The PG&E crew responsible for the power failure was doing
routine maintenance at a San Mateo substation. Grounding wires,
which are about as thick as a man's thumb, are normally put in
after the power is turned off to protect workers. They are
removed when the work is completed.
     But one of the workers failed to remove the wires before
power was restarted, triggering a massive short circuit and
causing two San Francisco power plants and 25 substations to
automatically shut down.
     The unidentified workers in the four-person construction
crew will  "go through the normal discipline process," said PG&E
President and CEO Gordon Smith. He declined to elaborate.
     Although the error was simple, the location was crucial.
     "(San Mateo) is a very critical substation; it's the
biggest one"  on the Peninsula, said Bellone.  "They don't all
feed downtown San Francisco."
     The Embarcadero, for instance, generally kept power because
it is fed by a separate 230-kilovolt line that was not affected.
Parts of the western Peninsula and The City also were on
different circuits and were not affected.
     That one substation could wipe out almost an entire major
city highlights San Francisco's geographic isolation at the upper
tip of a peninsula.
     Most other cities are fed power from many sources and from
several directions. But because San Francisco is bordered by
water on three sides, its power comes only from what it generates
at its own plants - at Potrero Hill and Hunters Point - and from
plants on the Peninsula and in San Jose.
     "In terms of lessons learned . . . it's worth revisiting
the question: Is San Francisco inherently necessarily that
isolated, or is there something we can do about that,"  said Ron
Knecht, president of the Economic and Technical Analysis Group,
an energy consulting firm in The City.
     PG&E's Smith said the company would be looking closely at
transmission upgrades.
     "Short of building an underwater transmission line to the
east or to the north, which is incredibly expensive, we can
probably do a better job of making sure (we have better)
transmission capability coming up the Peninsula,"  he said.
     Tom Ammiano, incoming president of the Board of Supervisors,
said he would ask for an investigation into PG&E's possible legal
liability for damages, particularly to small business operators.
     He said he would write to PG&E on behalf of the board
asking for an explanation of the power failure and then refer the
matter to The City's Public Utilities Commission.
     "I saw restaurants all along Market Street out of business,
losing their lunchtime clientele,"  he said.  "I'm sure the
losses were in the millions."
     Mayor Brown said police, fire and other emergency services
personnel had to be brought in, at great expense to The City, to
keep The City from sliding into chaos. He said The City would
file a claim to recover those costs from PG&E.
     Mark Ziering, manager of California Public Utilities
Commission's Energy Reliability Team, said state overseers might
look into why the problem had been able to spread so far without
any backup plan to stop it and why it had taken so long to
recover power.
     "In general, if you lose one system, the rest of the power
chain should be able to survive,"  he said.
     Ziering said that while PUC regulators were looking into
the power failure, it had not been decided whether they would
conduct a formal investigation.
     Patrick Dorinson, spokesman for the California Independent
System Operator, the newly formed organization that manages the
power transmission grid interconnecting the entire state, pointed
out that the Bay Area's problems had not threatened to knock out
power to the whole state, like the August 1996 failure that
started in Idaho and wiped out power to 11 western states.
     While the 1996 power failure created a cascading effect -
power stations going out one after another - Tuesday's had a
natural terminating point: it had nowhere to go after hitting San
Francisco. However, he said, his organization would also be
reviewing Tuesday's problem.
     "You always have to be concerned though, because
everything is interconnected,"  said Dorinson.
     Mayor Brown openly criticized PG&E, which had told him
Tuesday morning that power would be restored in 45 minutes.
     "They missed their target,"  he said.  "I would assume that
you would have some kind of backup plan when this kind of human
error could cause this kind of inconvenience."
     Smith went to The City's command center to apologize to
Brown and city officials.
     PG&E said power restoration lagged in some locations
because of the time-consuming nature of the work.
     "You physically have to move switches,"  said spokesman
Leonard Anderson.  "It takes time. Dozens of switches have to be
thrown, knobs have to be turned, switches have to be moved. It's
mechanical."
     Although most agreed the blackout was not directly related
to the deregulation of the energy industry - in which power
generation will open up to competition - activist Harvey
Rosenfield, a vocal opponent of key components of the
deregulation, said that there could be a correlation.
     As companies like PG&E rush to reorganize to become more
profitable, the public will "have to wait and see what the impact
of that will have on the important questions like safety,
reliability and quality"  of the system, Rosenfield said.
     Businesses that suffered financial losses can file a claim
with PG&E by calling 1-800-743-5000 or by going through its Web
site at http://www.pge.com. But the fact that PG&E sits in
judgment on claims disturbs former state Sen. Quentin Kopp, now
practicing law in San Francisco.
     He said Tuesday he had for years objected to PG&E's
procedure for assessing damage claims from consumers stemming
from power failures or other incidents.
     "That's supreme arrogance,"  said Kopp, who in 1996
proposed legislation that would have allowed consumers to be
reimbursed by PG&E in a kind of small claims court in which the
California Public Utilities Commission, and not PG&E, acted as
judges.
     The Legislature approved a watered-down version of the
bill but Gov. Wilson vetoed it.
     Kopp had acted after a series of serious winter storms
caused widespread power failures and many of his constituents
lost the contents of their refrigerators.
     He said there might be a case made against the utility for
 "perhaps emotional distress, certainly property damage, the loss
of income."
     While there were no reports of road rage, looting or other
bad human behavior Tuesday, psychologists agreed that blackouts
could indeed be emotionally distressing, especially as the world
we live in becomes increasingly wired.
     "We are so tethered to mother electricity, mother PG&E,"
said Lauren Wonder, spokeswoman for the California Psychological
Association.  "When these things are cut, we are stranded. We
take modern amenities for granted. When big outages happen, we go
back to being a primitive culture."
     Dr. Bernard Sjoberg, director of the Phobia Counseling
Center in San Jose, said major power failures tended to trigger
three different types of behavior.
     In some people, electrical failures stimulate creativity.
"These people see a challenge in a problem,"  said Sjoberg, a
clinical psychologist.  "They'll use a crowbar to get out of
their garage if they're stuck."
     Some people see blackouts as  "an opportunity to overthrow
the constraints that keep society together.  They loot, they
break windows."
     For other people, a temporary public emergency becomes a
personal crisis.
     "They see disruption of any part of their daily routine
as catastrophic,"  he said.  "They think what are other
consequences, what if the water goes out or what if their
children can't get home? They have panic attacks, they make
themselves nonfunctional and depressed."



Reply via email to