-Caveat Lector-
Hey, Hawk! I don't know how much we agree on, but you, Lloyd and me may turn
this list around yet! Jim Condit Jr. P.S. Again, thanks for another
excellent post (below) full of wit and sound thinking.
P.P.S. I'm not surprised if G. Harp and Nurev are against Bill Gates. They
seem to pick up their cues from a certain faction of the Ruling Elite who 1)
were blindsided by Gates's constructive revolution because they didn't
understand what was happening enough to kill it off like they have so many
inventions that, with a little research and help, could have also have
slightly or greatly improved humanity's lot; 2) are now double mad at Gates
that he blindsided them; 3) are terrified that he is going to wreck their
future plans to continue to exploit mankind, which wholesome destruction of
their power is already well under way; 4) have now set up an Inquisition to
go after Gates just like they did to ruin an Italian-American businessman
(name escapes) who was becoming too influential for Bernard Baruch's liking
before and during WWII (story is told in Henry Ford's International Jew
books, vol 1 or 2 I believe (lucky we're not living in Germany, where you're
not allowed to look at that series of books without "proving" that you have
a legitimate need to see it, I'll bet Nurev and G. Harp support that, how
about it guys?), or the type of Inquisition they set up over ATT in the
mid-80's when the Ruling Elite got a Judge Green appointed to approve ATT's
every move in order to break up ATT so that the whole communications system
could be reconstituted under new companies, especially WORLDCOM.
The funny thing is that, while they have the Judge appointed to harass Gates
to death, if possible, --- the Judge is having trouble keeping up with Gates
to even decide what to do. Funny. Whenever you see Gates mentioned in the
establishment media, note the way he is subtly painted as a villain --
almost always -- with a word here and a word there.
It's the same way that the worthless tramp Monica is always treated as a
sympathetic victim because of who she's fronting for, as opposed to the
courageous Linda Tripp (who because she was "born" into the wrong tribe) is
always portrayed as villanous and "baaaaaaaadddddd."
Anybody who watched Linda Tripp's press conference, where she was literally
shaking as she got her message out, can see she is a NORMAL American who
dared to try and save herself instead of tucking tail and running or
willingly putting her neck on the chopping block. Monica on the other hand,
trots around, well coached, getting paid millions soon for "services
rendered" with the air of one uppity valley girl who knows she enjoys the
protection of the world's top Media outlets and intelligence agencies. . . .
Oh well, so long for now.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Hawk
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 11:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] Living in corporate America.
>
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Gerald Harp wrote:
>
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > In a message dated 1/11/99 6:03:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Explanation: The poorest 40 percent of Americans did not
> contribute as
> > much to the lifestyle and productivity of American individuals
> as did Bill
> > Gates.
> > > Unlike the poorest 40%, everyone who bought goods from
> Microsoft did so as a
> > voluntary decision, whereas many of the poorest 40% were
> recipients of funds
> > extorted by threat of violence from the other 60%.
> >
> > Hawk, you seem to live in a dark pit.
>
> On the contrary, my dear man, I live in the bright sunshine of
> Texas! I even
> ocassionally venture outside the borders of this magnificent republic.
>
> > Your response is so appalling that i first passed it by because
> in the face of
> > such unreality, there doesn't seem to be much to say.
>
> Why, Son, that's because there really ISN'T much to say against
> it, which is all
> you have any interest in... So, I suppose you're going to bless
> us with more
> blather....
>
> > But i will say this.
>
> See? I knew it!
>
> > Suppose that you are perfectly right.
>
> I am.
>
> > Gates wealth relative to the 40% is solely due to his superior
> productivity so
> > that God Almighty and all decent right thinking citizens see
> the justice.
>
> I might have something to do with saving some back for a "rainy
> day," hiding some
> from the greedy and voracious govm't tax collectors, prospering
> due to the adage,
> "Help enough people get what they want, and you can have anything
> you want," and
> other factors that such as thrift and generosity.. I suspect
> there is more to it
> than "pure productivity."
>
> > Suppose Gates were to increase his productivity even more in
> ratio to his
> > fellows so that his wealth now exceeds 80% of the population.
> Would such a
> > wealth distribution be wise even for Mr. Gates?
>
> Why not? The fact that he has more doesn't mean that I have
> less.... If I didn't
> have two automobiles, would one suddenly appear in front of some
> African's hut?
> As a matter of fact, my own wealth has been INCREASING during the
> period of time
> that Bre'r Gates' has been increasing... Ain't that sort of wierd in your
> contorted economic theory? If there is some causal relationship,
> I hope Gates
> does continue to increase his wealth. You haven't come to
> realize that "wet
> streets don't cause rain."
>
> > If so, do you suppose that there might be some point at which
> society becomes so
> > unstable that the game is over?
>
> Don't wish too hard for it... You seem to always get around to some veiled
> "people's revolution" BS... You're a lot like NUREV, both of you
> rave on with your
> Walter Middy delusions of revolutionary grandeur, but I suspect
> that neither of
> you would have any idea of what to do if you were suddenly
> plopped into the middle
> of revolution... like my Mercedes suddenly materializing in front
> of the African's
> hut.
>
> Hawk
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list.
> Proselyzting propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are
> sordid matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections
> and outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and
> minor effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
> suggests to readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
