-Caveat Lector-
At 12:16 AM 1/19/99 -0500, pontificating little prick wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Listen -up Barb and Jim,
>This is my list to run as I wish. I can expose myself to any idea I wish.
blah, blah, blah. Mine, Mine, Mine, Waaaaahhhhh! You are amazing.
I would have been unsubscribing soon, as my work is substantially complete,
but now seems a good time to exit. This was my first list subscription and
describing the group dynamics alone has filled a small notebook. (You are
sooo knowledgeable, I suggest that you review Tavestock as your group is a
classic example of its well-known theories.) Jim is correct in that there
is a definite operational pattern on this list, and I have observed its
replication with tiresome regularity.
Although your list subscription numbers are relatively high (if not
exaggerated), the majority are clearly non-participating members. As to
the core group of active members - with a small number of notable
exceptions - a more arrogant, pretentious and self-congratulatory bunch
would be hard to find!! However, the most distinguishing feature of this
list is the blatant hypocrisy, e.g., continually insisting on
documentation, while refusing to provide any yourself - what unmitigated gall!!
While attempting to portray yourselves as open-minded researchers, the bulk
of your posts are political and economic dogma, flights of fantasy,
unsubstantiated rumors, and simple make believe with no, and I mean NO
basis in fact. The posts that aren't simply opinion or fantasy, again,
with a few notable exceptions, are not even unique as they are comprised of
info readily available in dozens of other places. The bulk of posts are
certainly not *research* by any definition. While narrow minded bigotry
and prejudice is nowhere more prevalent than on this list, you insist on
presenting yourselves as morally superior!!
I was not planning to post at all when I subscribed, but couldn't resist a
few times and the results were always interesting. Predictably, no one was
willing or able to address the outrageous assertions that minutely detailed
information is available to the likes of your group regarding various
powerful, super-secret organizations that purportedly rule the world. How
effective could the machinations of any all-powerful organization be if its
members, meeting agendas, and activities are regularly published on the
Internet, even in the face of armed guards!!! LOL, LOL.
Kris, you just keep sitting at your computer toking weed, living your
medieval fantasies. Your life purpose is obviously the protected
environment that you so enthusiastically provide to those intellectually
challenged individuals whom you have collected. Secure in the knowledge
that you will jump in and remove from the list any person who refuses to
conform or fold when the group attacks, your little band of idiots are free
to begin arguments they have not a prayer of finishing, and engaging in
their favorite activities of baiting, name calling, and proselytizing their
political, economic and religious beliefs. (Oh yes, proselytizing is not
only allowed, but actively encouraged for the select few espousing pc
views!) You are pitiful!!
Barb
BTW, as you are in the habit of depriving those you defame the courtesy of
defending themselves, I took the liberty of soliticating Hawk's response to
your last piece of malevolent tripe. Not that I expect you or the
Stepford posters to understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
> >Listen -up Barb and Jim,
> >This is my list to run as I wish. I can expose myself to any idea I wish.
He also doesn't mind exposing his ignorance and rudeness.
> >I do not have to, nor will I sustain promulugation of disruption and 'evil'.
Of course, he never was able to defend HIS basis for calling "anything" evil...
other than his own opinion. Here we go again, "A fool does not delight in
understanding, but only in expressing his own opinions." That's from the Book.
> >Racism and nazism are evil created by man. That is were evil comes from,
man.
The kicker here is, I never expressed a single racist thought. This
imbecile is
the racist... HE *assumed* that "slave" = "negro." It doesn't ... I would
venture,
though unable to prove it, that more whites, middle-easterners, and
orientals have
been slaves than have Negroes. He also conveniently overlooked the fact
that my
own family is multi-racial AND multi-national... That "racist" idea is a
figment of
his imagination, useful in all arguments where logic won't support his
position.
As far a "Nazi" is concerned, that is totally absurd! I am very close in
political
and economic thought to a Libertarian, which is almost the opposite of a
socialist
and the term Nazi, referred to members of the "National Socialist Party."
> Go look in the archives, Hawk and his psuedonymphette Charlene added very few
> >informational posts and if you read their posts, most are very
disruptive and
> >dissension creating.
I wish you WOULD look at the archives... I never ONCE initiated a
disruptive nor
disrespectful post... In fact, I initiated very few posts at all... practically
EVERY post I made was in defense of a personal attack on me ...
> >All of a sudden the lIst was topping over its 100 a message limit
everyday and
> >there is still 'stupid' dissension and discussion going on.
Look at the archive... You'll notice that there were multiple personal attacks,
which I responded to... what should a person do? Just let them make false
accusations? I admit, however, that I was enjoying the game.
> >The utility of the list is a big concern, for with more traffic comes
problems
> >of time and functionality of the list and then dealing with the 'problem'.
He CREATED much of the problem...
> >So if you wish to challenge your world view then go right ahead. Go to
> >alt.conspiracy and wallow. I have found nothing in nazism, racism and
> >dogmatic theocratism that is worth discussing, except about what they are,
> >wrong.
Also, I never ONCE implied that I was attempting to proselite anyone to any
kind of
"dogmatic theocratism." HE and others, on the contrary, would attempt to
use the
bible to show ME wrong, and I would point out their inferior understanding
of the
bible... Again... they initiated it, and then complained that I responded...
strange, isn't it?
>
> >Go, back in the archives and read the record and while you are at it you may
> >notice all what you two fine persons have contributed to our
understandings.
I suggest that you do just that...
Hawk
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
