-Caveat Lector-
How so? Per 1789 <--- note, 1789
The President
... was chosen by the electoral college which had to
choose 2 candidates (one of which did NOT reside in
THEIR state) to effectively cause a runoff (serving
as a search committee) for the House to ultimately
select
The Senate
... was chosen by the State Legislatures
The House
... was chosen by cordoned sections of the country
that could select ONE representative each
The Judicial
... appointed by the President, approved by the
Senate
Where does the Representation come in? America was supposed
to have a government which protected individual rights.
====================================================
No matter how many Abbot and Costello routines you go through,
no matter what kind of blibber blabber you quote ... in the end results
someone's will will be enacted.
Republic noun, Abbr. rep., Rep., Repub.
1.a. A political order whose head of state is not a monarch and
in modern times is usually a president. b. A nation that has
such a political order.
2.a. A political order in which the supreme POWER LIES IN A BODY
OF CITIZENS who are entitled to vote for officers and
representatives responsible to them.
b. A nation that has such a political order.
[French rpublique, from Old French, from Latin rspblica : rs,
thing + pblica, feminine of pblicus, of the people. See PUBLIC.]
( ...and of course, the word public is the population / or the
people) If the public has to right to elect the politicians and
the politicians are responsible to carry out the will of the
people, in the end, the outcome of a republic is the same as a
democracy... the majority of the people have their will enacted.
The definition of the word states they are only representatives
who are responsible to the public and a republic is "A political
order in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens"
This is supposed to be a republic so quote all the happy horse shit
until you are blue in the face and when you are done, tell me who's
will is enacted in a republic:
#1 Some minority
#2 Politicians should decide what laws the nation should have
based on their own agendas...
#3 The politicians should represent those who bribe them, in which
this nation is a political bribery form of government.
#4 Politicians should implement the will of their party bosses
#5 The politicians should implement the will of God as preachers
tell them what God really wants.
#6 The politicians should represent the will of the majority
No matter what you call a government, politicians enact the will
of a segment of people and in that same act they transgress
the will of those who have opposing wills.
No matter what you call it, in the end results which of the above 6
segments of society get to impose their will on all others?
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
