-Caveat Lector-

>From Wash DC Post

"" "Most Arab leaders would be overjoyed if they woke up one morning and
Saddam was gone," the official said. "They would like us to [topple the
Iraqi leader], and they would like us to do it quietly and efficiently.
What they say publicly -- they have to cater to the street." ""

<<What is most disconcerting to the "Arab Leaders" is the prospect of
having another clan or tribe usurp the authority the
Americans/British/whathaveyou give each of the the dependent regimes.  The
real danger S Hussein represented was taking away the means by which the
sheikhs, kings, et al, assert their authority:  petro$$$ and the military
powers generating same.  S Hussein equates to a latter day Nasser (albeit
different people, methods, et cetera).  Non-Arab influence in the region
dominates by the divide and confuse policy, augmented by
inter-tribal/Islamic sect rivalries.  Look for a moratorium on same to
unite the Islamists -- OPEC gone successful. A<>E<>R >>


General Wary of Plan To Arm Groups in Iraq
Commander in Gulf Fearful of 'Rogue State'

By Vernon Loeb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 29, 1999; Page A19

The general who commands U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf expressed deep
reservations yesterday about the Clinton administration's proposal to arm
the Iraqi opposition and said such a move could backfire and create a
"rogue state" in Iraq even more destabilizing than the regime of President
Saddam Hussein.

Echoing concerns over arming the opposition voiced this week by key U.S.
allies in the Persian Gulf, Marine Corps Gen. Anthony C. Zinni told the
Senate Armed Services Committee that none of 91 Iraqi opposition groups has
"the viability to overthrow Saddam at this point." Arming them, he warned,
"could be very dangerous."

"I've seen the effect of regime changes that didn't quite come about the
way we would have liked," said Zinni, chief of the U.S. Central Command.
"And the last thing we need is another rogue state. The last thing we need
is a disintegrated, fragmented Iraq because the effects on the region would
be far greater, in my mind, than a contained Saddam."

State Department spokesman James Foley later told reporters he endorsed
Zinni's conclusion that opposition groups were not an immediate threat to
the Iraqi regime and should not receive U.S. arms in the short term. But
Foley continued to embrace the Iraq Liberation Act and said the
administration's Iraq policy "reached a turning point" after Congress
passed the measure in September.

The act makes toppling Saddam's regime an explicit goal of U.S. foreign
policy and authorizes $97 million in military support to the Iraqi
opposition, but leaves any decision to arm the opposition to the
administration. "No decisions," Foley said, "have been made yet in that
regard."

As the administration shifts from containing Saddam to a more active
strategy of trying to topple his regime, it designated seven opposition
groups last week as eligible for military assistance and named a veteran
foreign service officer, Frank Ricciardone, to coordinate U.S. activities
with opposition groups.

But those efforts have triggered opposition. The Iranian-backed Supreme
Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, the most potent armed force within
the opposition, announced last week that it wanted no part of the U.S.
plan.

Two armed Kurdish militias occupying parts of northern Iraq, the only other
major opposition groups with armed soldiers, quickly followed suit, despite
extensive efforts by State Department officials last fall to unify the
groups and enlist their support in opposing the Iraqi regime.

Fearing heavily armed Kurdish forces on its border, the Turkish government,
a key U.S. ally in the region, expressed reservations this week about the
Iraq Liberation Act.

Turkish concerns were echoed yesterday by Saudi officials meeting in Riyadh
with Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright. The Saudis said the kingdom
"does not believe and does not support any foreign side to interfere in
changing the ruling regime in Iraq because any such change should take
place from within Iraq and by the people themselves," the Associated Press
reported.

One administration official in Washington acknowledged Turkey's concerns
about arming the Kurds, but cautioned that there is a difference between
the Saudis' public and private positions on U.S. efforts to help topple
Saddam.

"Most Arab leaders would be overjoyed if they woke up one morning and
Saddam was gone," the official said. "They would like us to [topple the
Iraqi leader], and they would like us to do it quietly and efficiently.
What they say publicly -- they have to cater to the street."

On Capitol Hill, Gen. Zinni and Walter B. Slocombe, assistant secretary of
defense for policy, bluntly told leading Senate proponents of the Iraq
Liberation Act that arming the opposition was misguided. But they intimated
that covert plans to topple Saddam were on the drawing board.

Zinni noted at one point that the administration has been working to unify
exile opposition groups operating outside Iraq as a political force, then
added: "What we do with the ones inside Iraq, I'd rather address in closed
session."

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who supports arming the Iraqi opposition,
challenged Zinni on earlier remarks the general had made questioning the
wisdom of the Iraq Liberation Act, noting that it "happened to be a law
that was passed and signed by the president of the United States."

"Do you still believe that the act represents an expensive pipe dream?"
McCain asked.

"Sir," Zinni replied, "there are 91 opposition groups, 91. We follow every
one of those opposition groups in great detail. I will be honest. I don't
see an opposition group that has the viability to overthrow Saddam at this
point."

Pentagon officials, meanwhile, reported another day of skirmishing in the
skies over Iraq. Two U.S. F-15E jets observed antiaircraft fire from a
battery north of Mosul in the northern no-fly zone at 7:45 a.m. EST and
responded by firing three GBU-12 laser-guided 500-pound bombs at the
installations, U.S. military officials said.

The engagement occurred two hours after a joint U.S.-Turkish military base
in Incirlik was put on full alert after a U.S. military radar system
detected a ballistic missile launch from Iraq, the officials said. All U.S.
personnel were ordered to don protective suits to guard against an attack
with chemical or biological weapons, the officials said. But the warning
proved to be a false alarm, and the alert was called off after 20 minutes.


© Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company


""Given the history of half-hearted and fitful U.S. attempts to build
opposition to Saddam Hussein, the Arab world has greeted this new policy
with some skepticism. Just this morning, two Saudi-owned newspapers in
London quoted an unnamed Saudi official as saying that the kingdom is
opposed to any foreign role in changing Iraq's government, saying that any
such change should "take place from within Iraq and by the people
themselves." ""

<<The Saudis (among others) do (and should) not want non-Arabs solving Arab
problems given the history of the British & French followed by the
Americans to influence the status quo.  The legacy of bolstering trumped up
governments (friendly to the money chests, not necessarily to their own
indigenous populations) has basically created a climate wherein the
governments become the leaders and their armies -- their
commander-in-chiefs of the domestic forces.  Foreign sponsored leadership
changes have resulted in the whole region becoming touchy.  S Hussein's
continued presence creates stability by having everyone's ire focussed on
him; his ouster may cause the ire to be focussed elsewhere -- like on the
regimes that are currently 'friendly', 'nice', 'stable', 'oil-rich', and
'compliant'.  A<>E<>R >>

U.S. Builds Support For Ouster Of Saddam

By Thomas W. Lippman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 29, 1999; Page A19

AMMAN, Jordan, Jan. 28—On a quick swing through Arab capitals that ended
here today, Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright assured friendly
leaders that the United States is serious about ending Saddam Hussein's
rule in Iraq and asked for their assistance.

She told them that the new U.S. policy, which she described as "containment
plus regime change," represents a long-term commitment by the Clinton
administration to combine military, political, economic and diplomatic
pressure on Saddam Hussein, and she asked for their help, according to
senior officials traveling with her.

Albright's public comments and background briefings by senior aides
underlined the extent to which Washington's strategy for dealing with Iraq
has changed since Saddam Hussein cut off U.N. weapons inspections last
year. Convinced that no credible inspection system can be reinstated so
long as Saddam Hussein rules Iraq, the United States is marshaling
resources to get rid of him, and, until he is ousted, will use military
force as needed to keep him from making trouble.

"The Iraqi people deserve better leadership," Albright told U.S. troops
this morning during a visit to Prince Sultan Air Base, in the Saudi Arabian
desert south of Riyadh. "We are dedicated to that mission, and we don't
give up before the job is finished. So it's not going to be real soon that
you're out of here, but it is very important that you are here."

On Wednesday, Albright reviewed the new U.S. policy with Egyptian President
Hosni Mubarak and Foreign Minister Amr Mousa. Afterward, she flew to Riyadh
for talks with Crown Prince Abdullah and Foreign Minister Saud Faisal that
lasted well past midnight.

She then stopped here briefly, adding Jordan to her schedule so she could
show support for Jordan's crown prince, also named Abdullah. He was sworn
in as heir to the throne Wednesday as his father, King Hussein, returned to
the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota for a new round of cancer treatment.

This was essentially a courtesy call, but Albright said she and Abdullah
talked briefly about Iraq and she repeated to him that "our policy is to
contain Saddam and work toward regime change there."

Given the history of half-hearted and fitful U.S. attempts to build
opposition to Saddam Hussein, the Arab world has greeted this new policy
with some skepticism. Just this morning, two Saudi-owned newspapers in
London quoted an unnamed Saudi official as saying that the kingdom is
opposed to any foreign role in changing Iraq's government, saying that any
such change should "take place from within Iraq and by the people
themselves."

Senior U.S. officials did not claim that Mubarak or the Saudi crown prince
endorsed the U.S. campaign or offered to help, but they said that leaders
of both countries were sympathetic to the idea that Iraq's people, isolated
and impoverished by years of tight economic sanctions, deserve new
leadership. They said Mubarak and Abdullah asked them not to say anything
about what assistance, if any, they promised to provide.

"What I heard at the last two stops is a deep conviction that the only way
out is a change of regime," one senior official said after Albright left
Saudi Arabia.

Judging from the private comments of administration officials, as well as
from recent public remarks by Albright and Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni, chief
of the U.S. Southern Command, the Clinton administration appears convinced
that Saddam Hussein was seriously weakened domestically by last month's
U.S. and British airstrikes. U.S officials also said the Iraqi leader
undercut his political stature throughout the Arab world with his recent
calls for the overthrow of the Egyptian and Saudi rulers.

In addition, U.S. officials said, the reputation of Iraq's exile opposition
for fecklessness and ineptitude is undeserved. "There is serious opposition
to Saddam Hussein inside Iraq, people are paying with their lives every
day," one senior official said. "And outside, there are many groups that
have links inside Iraq who can communicate a new vision of Iraq" to their
sympathizers at home. "People go in and out. The regime can't stop that."

Albright introduced the Egyptian and Saudi leaders to Frank Ricciardone,
whom she recently appointed as special representative for the transition in
Iraq. In practice, he will coordinate the effort to organize the
opposition, which Congress has funded with $97 million.

Ricciardone understands the difficulty of his task. As deputy chief of
mission at the U.S. Embassy in Turkey, he was responsible for evacuating
thousands of CIA-sponsored Iraqi dissidents when Saddam Hussein's troops
overran their operations in Northern Iraq in 1996.




© Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company
~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R

The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to