-Caveat Lector-
Fascism On The Move Toward "New Order"
Madeleine Albright Makes it Plain
On January 18th the San Francisco Chronicle carried a story,
originally published in the Los Angeles Times, detailing the plans of
U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to establish "a new
international order, one that would revamp existing global
institutions and spawn entirely new ones." According to the L.A.
Times, Albright is referring to "the new order" as a kind of
"international democracy club" where the U.S. would be the "organizing
principle." "The 21st century ... ought to be the century of
democracy," Albright told the L.A. Times. "We're going to be putting
an awful lot more emphasis on organizing the democracies, working with
them ... so they can work with each other better." Only those who
understand what kind of "democracy" she's talking about know what this
means for the world.
In case the reader fails to grasp the meaning behind Albright's
government-speak, we will translate. "Organize" means nothing less
than "control", and this "new international order" means "world wide
control." Albright said that "we [the foreign policy establishment]
are the organizing principle." Other nations will "either organize
with us or against us," she declared, meaning that those nations who
won't play ball will be branded as pariahs and ostracized by the
international community. When Albright says "democracy" she really
means "doing it my way."
Fascism in Democracy's Clothing
In the minds of many well-meaning folks "democracy" is synonymous with
government of, by, and for "the people", self-determination, rule of
law and an open society. Often President Clinton claims to be working
"for the American people," as do many in the U.S. Congress. This is
the illusion of democracy, but the reality is far different. This
reality was aptly defined by Noam Chomsky, a self-defined Socialist
and professor at M.I.T. He wrote:
"Democracy," in the United States rhetoric refers to a system of
governance in which elite elements based in the business community
control the state by virtue of their dominance of the private society,
while the population observes quietly. So understood, democracy is a
system of elite decision and public ratification, as in the United
States itself. Correspondingly, popular involvement in the formation
of public policy is considered a serious threat. It is not a step
towards democracy; rather it constitutes a 'crisis of democracy' that
must be overcome. (Noam Chomsky, On Power and Ideology, 1987)
The evidence is overwhelming that Albright's "new international order"
will not be much different from Hitler's "neue ordnung" and
Mussolini's "ordine nuovo." It is the amalgamation of government and
big business, as well as state direction of the economy that defines
fascism, and, when Albright says "democracy" she really means
"fascism" -- the current form of government in America today.
Perhaps it was their dedication to Western tradition that led our
forefathers to mount the Roman fasces behind the Speaker's chair in
the U.S. House of Representatives. Made up of rods bound about an ax,
this ancient symbol has appropriately become the trademark of modern
fascism, "a system of government characterized by dictatorship,
belligerent nationalism, and racism, militarism, etc..." (Webster's
New World Dictionary) This "binding up", or as Albright puts it,
"organizing" of the world's democracies, reveals the truth about her
definition of democracy. The new order will be totalitarian, on the
global scale as it is on the local, which indicates what is ahead for
the world if the 21st century becomes "the century of democracy" as
Albright and the rest of the foreign policy cabal would like.
Hitler solidified his political power by joining an alliance with the
industrialists of Germany. In turn, he protected the large
corporations and extended them favorable treatment. Hitler reigned in
Nazi radicals who sought to topple big business in what was called
"the second revolution." On July 1, 1933, Hitler told his S.A. and
S.S. leaders: "I will suppress every attempt to disturb the existing
order as ruthlessly as I will deal with the so-called second
revolution, which would lead only to chaos." (William L. Shirer, The
Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, 1950)
The marriage of money and demagoguery was consummated in Hitler's
Third Reich and Mussolini's Italy. While wealth and political power
have always colluded to some degree, there comes a point where apathy,
pseudo-tolerance and ignorance binds the will of the masses to a
fanatical idea that brings their destruction. It is this subjective,
enervated, and brain-dead mental state that led the Germans to embrace
the Nazi regime. "The masses are like an animal that obeys its
instincts," Hitler observed of the Germans. "They do not reach
conclusions by reasoning." (Leonard Peikoff, The Ominous Parallels,
p.47) This same collective state-of-mind is what the Hitlers of our
day are using to introduce "democracy" into the world, not a system of
individual freedoms and self-determination, but a fascist system of
propaganda, fanatical ideas, and a controlled economy masquerading as
a "free market". In other words, a fascist war-like police state with
a post-modern appearance and rhetoric.
Following the example of her Nazi (national socialists) predecessors,
Secretary Albright is exporting this political model abroad with the
purpose of including all countries in this "international democracy
club", of which "we" will become the "organizing principle". "[E]ither
organize with us or against us," she warns those nations who might opt
out, adding that a "concrete program" should be in place "by the
beginning of the spring."
This "Democracy" Leaves Swath of Destruction
"Democracy" in the rhetoric of cabalistic government insiders, refers
to a deceptive counterfeit used to weaken and control sovereign
nations. On the surface we have a rhetoric of hope, a promise of
freedom for the oppressed, of social justice and equality. Where ever
old regimes fall and this democracy springs up, crime, chaos and
tyranny are the result.
For example, one year ago voters in Mexico City, the world's most
populous urban center, chose their first mayor by popular vote.
Cuauhtemoc Cardenas is the first mayor who doesn't belong to the
ruling PRI party this century. He is also a Marxist and the darling of
the international press apparatus who proclaimed that the grip of the
PRI was broken and "democracy" begun in Mexico. When Cardenas took
office he was wildly popular with the people, but in the 12 months
since his inauguration, crime in his city has skyrocketed. On January
12 PBS's Lehrer News Hour ran a special segment on Mexico City's crime
epidemic. After delineating various aspects of the city's urban
nightmare, Charles Kraus reported:
Without question, the city's most serious problem is the general
breakdown of law and order: Assaults, bank robberies, car-jackings,
taxi-jackings, kidnappings -- and policemen on the take --make living
here, and traveling from one part of the city to another an often
dangerous and terrifying experience.
According to this PBS report, a recent poll revealed that eighteen
percent of the city's residents have been a victim of a crime in the
last three months. Also, in a police force that has been corrupt for
decades, there are now officers who routinely commit robberies while
off-duty. While crime and official corruption have long been a problem
in this city of 20 million, it is interesting to note that a
"politically correct" mayor schooled in the art and nuances of Third
Way politics has not only failed to address these problems, but has
presided over their exponential increase. Of course, "there are said
to be factions within Mexico's long-ruling Institutional Revolutionary
Party, the PRI, that have no interest in allowing Cardenas to
succeed," reported Charles Krause. This boilerplate excuse of the
darlings of today's internationalist democracy. "All the problems are
the fault of the old order", they claim.
Mexico's problems are complex, and have as much to do with a defective
economic system as a political. The 1994 peso devaluation sank the
country's economy and it has never recovered. What's more, like all of
Latin America, Mexico is mired in debt to the international banking
cartel. This is part of the scheme of democracy when it moves in -- it
imposes a program of financial austerity designed to enhance the
profits of the investment banking cartel. Follow the money, as they
say, and you will find those promoting so-called democracy.
Brazil is in the same boat as Mexico. Having made the transition from
military dictatorship to democracy several years ago, it is now the
apex of the global economic crisis, its economy sinking rapidly, and
its moneyed class moving in droves to fortified condominium complexes
where they seek safety from gangs of kidnappers and robbers. Crime has
become epidemic.
The situation is even worse in Russia, another new "democracy" that
has foundered under the weight of "the global economy" and all it
entails. Russia's economy has collapsed and people buy what they need
by bartering.
"Democracy" Terrorizes South Africa
Of all the examples of chaos and social disintegration, none are more
striking than the decline and fall of South Africa (read The new South
Africa, the same old bondage, The WINDS). Home invasions, muggings,
carjackings, blacks murdering whites as well as black on black
violence, continue to increase. Last November the social and economic
collapse of this once great country was dramatically described, not by
a racist longing for the glory days, but by Alan Paton's widow. Paton
was the renowned author of "Cry, The Beloved Country," and he become
famous for his impassioned speeches and writings against apartheid.
He died in 1988, ten years before his widow Anne would describe the
"new, democratic" South Africa in an essay published on Sunday,
November 29, in the London Sunday Times.
The title of Anne Paton's essay was "Why I'm fleeing South Africa".
She wrote:
I am leaving South Africa. I have lived here for 35 years, and I shall
leave with anguish. My home and my friends are here, but I am
terrified. I know I shall be in trouble for saying so, because I am
the widow of Alan Paton....
Among my friends and the friends of my friends, I know of nine people
who have been murdered in the past four years ... An old friend, an
elderly lady, was raped and murdered by someone who broke into her
home for no reason at all; another was shot at a garage....
I have been hijacked, mugged and terrorized. A few years ago my car
was taken from me at gunpoint. I was forced into the passenger seat. I
sat there frozen. But just as one man jumped into the back and the
other fumbled with the starter I opened the door and ran away ...
still clutching my handbag.
On May 1 this year I was mugged in my home at three in the
afternoon.... I came home and omitted to close the security door. I
went upstairs to lie down. After a while I thought I'd heard a noise,
perhaps a bird or something. Without a qualm I got up and went to the
landing; outside was a man. I screamed and two other men appeared. I
was seized by the throat and almost throttled; I could feel myself
losing consciousness.
My mouth was bound with Sellotape and I was threatened with my own
knife and told: "If you make a sound, you die." My hands were tied
tightly behind my back and I was thrown into the guest room and the
door was shut. They took all the electronic equipment they could find,
except the computer. They also, of course, took the car.
The last straw came a few weeks ago, shortly before my 71st birthday.
I returned home in the middle of the afternoon and walked into my
sitting room. Outside the window two men were breaking in. I retreated
to the hall and pressed the panic alarm ... one of the men ran around
the house, jumped over the fence and tried to batter down the front
door. Meanwhile, his accomplice was breaking my sitting-room window
with a hammer.
This took place while the sirens were shrieking, which was the
frightening part. They kept coming, in broad daylight, while the alarm
was going. They knew that there had to be a time lag of a few minutes
before help arrived - enough time to dash off with the television and
video recorder....
Last week, about 10km from my home, an old couple were taken out and
murdered in the garden. The wife had only one leg and was in a
wheelchair. Yet they were stabbed and strangled - for very little
money. They were the second old couple to be killed last week. It goes
on and on, all the time; we have become a killing society....
While some people say I have been unlucky, others say: "You are lucky
not to have been raped or murdered." What kind of a society is this
where one is considered "lucky" not to have been raped or murdered -
yet?
Its called a democracy, Mrs. Paton, and you have the United States to
thank for your country's demise. In 1982 Senator Ted Kennedy sponsored
legislation that imposed economic sanctions against white ruled South
Africa, creating more hard ships for black people until "democracy"
was finally permitted. Now things are really hell for everyone in that
boiling cauldron. Don't blame that on the policies of the former white
government.
Such conditions have always accompanied democracy, as was seen in the
inspiration for our modern democracies, the French Revolution. At the
height of the "revolution" (democracy), writes historian Otto Scott,
"[b]urglaries grew fearsome; entire homes were invaded and people
tortured; murders and robberies increased. Yet the Government was not
interested in crime as such, only crime that seemed to have political
meaning." (Robespierre - the Fool as Revolutionary, p.216) Today,
democracies are more interested in suppressing "hate crime", or the
activities of their "right-wing" and anti-abortion foes, than in
establishing the rule of law based on sound moral, economic, and
constitutional principles. The fruits of lawlessness are everywhere
this "democracy" is praised.
"By their fruits ye shall know them..."
The dichotomy of modern democracy may be seen in the character of its
proponents. Madeleine Albright is a woman who loves to sass the
Saddams, the Milosevics, and the Castros of the world. She is famous
for her cocky sound bites as well as the Stetson and boots she wore on
her first official trip abroad as Secretary of State. As a woman she
is devoid of womanly grace and compassion, as a mother and grandmother
she is strangely indifferent to the deaths of half a million Iraqi
children (calling their deaths "worth it"), and as a Jew who lost both
parents in W.W.II, she is not bothered by genocide (as long as it's
committed by the U.S. and Israel). Instead of a mature and graceful
woman Albright resembles the female reincarnation of Karl Adolph
Eichmann, machismo combined with a heart of ice in an old woman's
body. Could it be that she resembles the "new woman" of "[t]he 21st
century ... the century of democracy" and even "democracy" itself? If
so, it is appropriate that she be given the task of organizing it.
Alexander Hamilton once said, "We are a Republican Government. Real
liberty is never found in despotism or in the extremes of democracy."
This was confirmed by Samuel Adams who stated, "Remember, democracy
never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself! There
never was a democracy that did not commit suicide."
We cannot wish you well, Madam Albright.
Copyright © 1999, The WINDS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
http://www.TheWinds.org
--------------
"If you establish a democracy, you must in due time reap the fruits of
a democracy. You will in due season have great impatience of the
public burdens, combined in due season with great increase of the
public expenditure. You will in due season have wars entered into
from passion and not from reason; and you will in due season submit to
peace ignominiously sought and ignominiously obtained, which will
diminish your authority and perhaps endanger your independence. You
will in due season find your property is less valuable, and your
freedom less complete."
-Benjamin Disraeli Speech in the House of Commons March 31, 1850
-----------------
"The United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a
REPUBLICAN form of government."
-Constitution of the United States, Art. IV, 1789
**********************************************************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Patriot Resource Center:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6627/
**********************Live Free or Die!**********************<><
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
