-Caveat Lector-
"Jim Condit Jr." wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Is this a subject that falls under revisionism and therefore can only be
> discussed from one side on this list? Looks like we have a de facto state
> religion forming in Amsterdam and elsewhere -- together with is own
> "dogmas" that cannot be questioned without penalties and maybe jail time,
Why don't you assume that the Dutch are at least as smart as you are.
Their
state may not be organized the way the USA is. They may not think it
important
to have a separation of church and state. You are so incredibally
presumtuious
to think that way. Furthermore, they have a far better understanding
of the
issue than you apparently do. And lastly, there is no ADL for racists
to hide
behind in Holland.
> eh? Jim Condit Jr. P.S. Upon re-reading the above questions sounds
> sarcastic, but it is meant to be serious.
>
> On Thursday, December 10, 1998 3:15 PM, Robert Tatman
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > Court bans questions on Anne Frank veracity
> >
> > AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - A Dutch court on Wednesday slapped a ban on all
> > publications questioning the authenticity of Jewish teenager Anne Frank's
> > wartime diary, saying they insulted and offended Jews.
> >
> > The case, brought by Amsterdam's Anne Frank Foundation and the Anne Frank
> > Fund in Basle, stems from the unsolicited distribution to Dutch libraries
> in
> > 1992 of a book alleging Frank's father Otto was the real writer of her
> > journal, which chronicles her family's years in hiding from the Nazis.
> >snip>
> > The court ruled on Wednesday that Frank's diary should be seen as
> authentic
> > and that it was unlawful to cast doubts on its veracity.
> >
> > It ruled that the publisher and authors of the book in question, ``Anne
> Frank:
> > a critical approach'' were banned from distributing the book or any
> material
> > of a similar content on pain of a 25,000 guilder fine per breach.
> >
> > ``The Anne Frank Foundation welcomes the court's judgement that the
> denial of
> > the diary's authenticity and the accusations directed at Otto Frank are
> > insulting and hurtful to Jews in general and to the Anne Frank Foundation
> > and...Fund in particular,'' the foundation said in a statement.
> >
> > It said the book, by Frenchman Robert Faurisson and Belgian Siegfried
> > Verbeke, had been published by a Belgian publisher specialising in
> so-called
> > 'revisionist' literature which questions whether the Holocaust really
> > happened.
> >
> > Similar trials have been held in Germany, the statement said.
> >
> > =================================
Do you even know who Robert Faurisson is?
Joshua2
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
