-Caveat Lector-
>From bwc.htm @ www.cybereditions.com
Philosophy and Literature
announces
Winners of the Fourth Bad Writing Contest (1998)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are pleased to announce winners of the fourth Bad Writing Contest,
sponsored by the scholarly journal Philosophy and Literature.
The Bad Writing Contest celebrates the most stylistically lamentable
passages found in scholarly books and articles published in the last few
years. Ordinary journalism, fiction, departmental memos, etc. are not
eligible, nor are parodies: entries must be non-ironic, from serious,
published academic journals or books. Deliberate parody cannot be allowed
in a field where unintended self-parody is so widespread.
Two of the most popular and influential literary scholars in the U.S. are
among those who wrote winning entries in the latest contest.
Judith Butler, a Guggenheim Fellowship-winning professor of rhetoric and
comparative literature at the University of California at Berkeley, admired
as perhaps "one of the ten smartest people on the planet," wrote the
sentence that captured the contest's first prize. Homi K. Bhabha, a leading
voice in the fashionable academic field of postcolonial studies, produced
the second-prize winner.
"As usual," commented Denis Dutton, editor of Philosophy and Literature,
"this year's winners were produced by well-known, highly-paid experts who
have no doubt labored for years to write like this. That these scholars
must know what they are doing is indicated by the fact that the winning
entries were all published by distinguished presses and academic journals."
Professor Butler's first-prize sentence appears in "Further Reflections on
the Conversations of Our Time," an article in the scholarly journal
Diacritics (1997):
The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to
structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of
hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence,
and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of
structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes
structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights
into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed
conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies
of the rearticulation of power.
Dutton remarked that "it’s possibly the anxiety-inducing obscurity of such
writing that has led Professor Warren Hedges of Southern Oregon University
to praise Judith Butler as ‘probably one of the ten smartest people on the
planet’."
This year’s second prize went to a sentence written by Homi K. Bhabha, a
professor of English at the University of Chicago. It appears in The
Location of Culture (Routledge, 1994):
If, for a while, the ruse of desire is calculable for the uses of
discipline soon the repetition of guilt, justification, pseudo-scientific
theories, superstition, spurious authorities, and classifications can be
seen as the desperate effort to "normalize" formally the disturbance of a
discourse of splitting that violates the rational, enlightened claims of
its enunciatory modality.
This prize-winning entry was nominated by John D. Peters of the University
of Iowa, who describes it as "quite splendid: enunciatory modality,
indeed!"
Ed Lilley, an art historian at the University of Bristol in the U.K.,
supplied a sentence by Steven Z. Levine from an anthology entitled Twelve
Views of Manet’s "Bar" (Princeton University Press, 1996):
As my story is an august tale of fathers and sons, real and imagined, the
biography here will fitfully attend to the putative traces in Manet’s work
of "les noms du père," a Lacanian romance of the errant paternal phallus
("Les Non-dupes errent"), a revised Freudian novella of the inferential
dynamic of paternity which annihilates (and hence enculturates) through the
deferred introduction of the third term of insemination the
phenomenologically irreducible dyad of the mother and child.
Stewart Unwin of the National Library of Australia passed along this gem
from the Australasian Journal of American Studies (December 1997). The
author is Timothy W. Luke, and the article is entitled, "Museum Pieces:
Politics and Knowledge at the American Museum of Natural History":
Natural history museums, like the American Museum, constitute one decisive
means for power to de-privatize and re-publicize, if only ever so slightly,
the realms of death by putting dead remains into public service as social
tokens of collective life, rereading dead fossils as chronicles of life's
everlasting quest for survival, and canonizing now dead individuals as
nomological emblems of still living collectives in Nature and History. An
anatomo-politics of human and non-human bodies is sustained by accumulating
and classifying such necroliths in the museum's observational/expositional
performances.
The passage goes on to explain that museum fossils and artifacts are
"strange superconductive conduits, carrying the vital elan of contemporary
biopower." It’s demonstrated with helpful quotations from Michel Foucault’s
History of Sexuality.
Finally, a tour de force from a 1996 book published by the State University
of New York Press. It was located by M.J. Devaney, an editor at the
University of Nebraska Press. The author is D.G. Leahy, writing in
Foundation: Matter the Body Itself.
Total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute
the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally
predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the
absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is
not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is
not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the
equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is
not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the
darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self). This is the real
exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely
unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light
univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally
predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of
the other of self-identity: existence univocally predicated of the
absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The precision of the shining of
the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light. The
precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light
itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first
time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new
creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally
identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the
dark itself equivocally, in "self-alienation," not "self-identity, itself
in self-alienation" "released" in and by "otherness," and "actual other,"
"itself," not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the
darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the
self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this
darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification
person-self).
Dr. Devaney calls this book "absolutely, unequivocally incomprehensible."
While she has supplied further extended quotations to prove her point, this
seems to be enough.
************************************************
The next round of the Bad Writing Contest, results to be announced at the
end of 1999, is now open. There is an endless ocean of pretentious, turgid
academic prose being added to daily, and we'll continue to honor it.
Prof. Denis Dutton
Editor, Philosophy and Literature
University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
