-Caveat Lector-
I started the dope debate to collect all arguments.
I had no idea that I would get so many.
I have created a folder to put all the post so I
could sort out the arguments pro and con.
When people take a stand from scratch or
when they are emotionally involved, they can not
see the forest for the trees... but if they can
stand back and see both sides of the argument
before they step into the debate, they can take
their choice as to where they stand from all info.
I will post this last note and then collect your
responses and put into my dope folder.
===============================
The only argument I have seen that is left is:
This is not a valid argument IMO. Besides I would submit that there are
plenty of people who are crazy who walk around all the time with a loaded
weapon and DON'T shoot anyone. Should they all be punished simply
because
they MIGHT do something wrong? The POTENTIAL for crime is not a
sufficient
reason to charge illegality....
and
People can not be stopped from doing what they want because they MIGHT
hurt someone else.
==================================
Freedom = being able to do what you want.
In this argument any one should be able to do any thing they want
... for the purpose of their own profit or to get their cookies off
people must be allowed to endanger and kill innocent victims.
A while back I asked these questions:
***
Here your argument is (I think) should people be stopped from doing
something
just because it MIGHT result in harming others.
#1 Do you believe in equal rights ... yes or no
#2 Should every one have the same right to profit, get stupid or do any
thing
they want because their acts only have the potential to harm
others?
#3 or should only a select group have the right to endanger others?
Let me know before I post a list of people who are fined and imprisoned
for endangering others and then I will ask why you are not defending
them.
***
I don't remember the exact statistic now, but if they said 60% of all
prisoners
who were released early would be sent back as repeat offenders.
60 out of every 100 is going to rob, rape, kill or beat the bloody hell
out
of an innocent victim.
So, knowing that not all prisoners will commit another crime, they let
out
a batch of 100..
And for every 100 let out, 60 of them are going to rob, rape, kill or
beat
the bloody hell out of an innocent victim.
=================================================
On the theme that you are going to allow people to have their freedoms
in spite of the fact a % of them will sicken, injure or kill others, you
have
agreed that the innocent disposable victims are with the freedoms of
the perverts.
The bleeding heart liberals creed, people must have their freedoms
to profit, get their cookies off or do damn well please at the expense
of innocent victims.
#1 Do you believe in equal rights ... yes or no
#2 or should only a select group have the right to endanger others?
DO ANY THING YOU WANT AT THE RISK AND
SACRIFICE OF A % OF INNOCENT VICTIMS.
If all bleeding heart liberals hold the same standard for everyone then:
Tell me if you defend people's rights to
* Should ex convicts be able to carry guns, after all every ex con would
not shoot some one.
* I saw where a baby crib manufacturer sold over 100,000 cribs and
only 7 babies were killed, so why should that manufacture lose
their freedom to profit, just because some babies were killed?
* Do you support kid's right to drag race on the streets. Why take
away their rights because after all drag racers do not kill innocent
people.
* Why should your employer be forced to pay thousands of dollars to
make sure you do not get hurt, after all, only a percent of people
will
be injured or killed. Why shouldn't your employer have the right to
risk your safety and life?
* Do you protect parent's rights to lock their little kids in a car on
a summer day... after all only a small % of kid's lives will be
sacrificed
so the parents can do what they want.
* Run through stop signs after all, ever one who runs through a stop
sign does not injure or kill others.
Now Mr bleeding heart liberal, do you stick by your "principals" that
disposable victims must be sacrificed so people can have their "freedom"
to profit or get their cookies off?
In the list above I have shown several categories of such people, do you
support ALL pervert's rights to sacrifice disposable victims or are you
a double standard hypocrite who has a different philosophy for others?
#1 You support the "freedoms" of drunks, dope users and all the above
to endanger and sacrifice a % of innocent victims or
#2 You do not support the freedoms of people to endanger and sacrifice
any victims?
#3 or .. you are a two face hypocrite who denies others the same
freedoms
you wish to grant drunks and dope users?
Which is it Jethro?
.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
