Subject: CFR Senators Vote To Acquitt or CFR Senators Vote To Approve
Jury Nullification
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:44:06 -0700
From: Elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: roundtable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Real-To: Elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roundtable:
Just thought I'd try to see some positive
use of this most negative outcome. It
appears the LEGISLATIVE TRIBUNALS
have confirmed that the jury can judge the
law as well as the facts, or at least apply
the law when they choose to.
Otherwise, legislators must be seen as
misprisions.
Elder
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At 04:12 PM 2/12/99 -0500, you wrote:
Friday, February 12, 1999 the Senate acquitted Council on Foreign
Relations member President Clinton of all impeachment charges,
ensuring he will remain in office.
At least thirteen of the 100 Senators belong to the Council on Foreign
Relations. Only five republican Senators (Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe
of Maine, Jim Jeffords of Vermont, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and John
Chafee of Rhode Island) joined Democrats in opposing both articles. Two
of the five, Olympia Snowe and John Chaffee, are Council on Foreign
Relations members.
Eleven Council on Foreign Relations senators opposed both articles ofimpeachment. The
Roll of
Council on Foreign Relations Senator Votes on
Impeachment were:
Graham, Bob (D-Florida) no no
Robb, Charles (D-Virginia) no no
Moynihan, Daniel (D-New York) no no
Dodd, Christopher (D-Connecticut) no no
Feinstein, Dianne (D-California) no no
Kerry, John (D-Massachusetts) no no
Lieberman, Joseph (D-Connecticut) no no
Rockefeller John (D-West Virginia) no no
Torricelli, Robert (D-New Jersey) no no
Chafee, John (R-Rhode Island) no no
Snowe, Olympia (R-Maine) no no
Lugar, Richard (R-Indiana) yes yes
Roth, William (R-Delaware) yes yes
Roll Of All U.S. Senators' Votes On Impeachment Source: Yahoo! News
Politics Headlines
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/pl/story.html?s=v/nm/19990212/pl/roll_
1.htm
l
Friday February 12 12:54 PM ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Following is a full list of how the 100 U.S.
Senators voted on the two articles of impeachment against President
Clinton Friday.
There are 45 Democrats (D) and 55 Republicans (R):
- PERJURY OBSTRUCTION - OF JUSTICE
Abraham, Spencer (R-Michigan) yes yes
Akaka, Daniel (D-Hawaii) no no
Allard, Wayne (R-Colorado) yes yes
Ashcroft, John (R-Missouri) yes yes
Baucus, Max (D-Montana) no no
Bayh, Evan (D-Indiana) no no
Bennett, Robert (R-Utah) yes yes
Biden, Joseph (D-Delaware) no no
Bingaman, Jeff (D-New Mexico) no no
Bond, Christopher (R-Missouri) yes yes
Boxer, Barbara (D-California) no no
Breaux, John (D-Louisiana) no no
Brownback, Sam (R-Kansas) yes yes
Bryan, Richard (D-Nevada) no no
Bunning, Jim (R-Kentucky) yes yes
Burns, Conrad (R-Montana) yes yes
Byrd, Robert (D-West Virginia) no no
Campbell, Ben Nighthorse (R-Colorado) yes yes
Chafee, John (R-Rhode Island) no no
Cleland, Max (D-Georgia) no no
Cochran, Thad (R-Mississippi) yes yes
Collins, Susan (R-Maine) no no
Conrad, Kent (D-North Dakota) no no
Coverdell, Paul (R-Georgia) yes yes
Craig, Larry (R-Idaho) yes yes
Crapo, Mike (R-Idaho) yes yes
Daschle, Thomas (D-South Dakota) no no
Dewine, Mike (R-Ohio) yes yes
Dodd, Christopher (D-Connecticut) no no
Domenici, Pete (R-New Mexico) yes yes
Dorgan, Byron (D-North Dakota) no no
Durbin, Richard (D-Illinois) no no
Edwards, John (D-North Carolina) no no
Enzi, Mike (R-Wyoming) yes yes
Feingold, Russell (D-Wisconsin) no no
Feinstein, Dianne (D-California) no no
Fitzgerald, Peter (R-Illinois) yes yes
Frist, William (R-Tennessee) yes yes
Gorton, Slade (R-Washington) no yes
Graham, Bob (D-Florida) no no
Gramm, Phil (R-Texas) yes yes
Grams, Rod (R-Minnesota) yes yes
Grassley, Chuck (R-Iowa) yes yes
Gregg, Judd (R-New Hampshire) yes yes
Hagel, Charles (R-Nebraska) yes yes
Harkin, Tom (D-Iowa) no no
Hatch, Orrin (R-Utah) yes yes
Helms, Jesse (R-North Carolina) yes yes
Hollings, Ernest (D-South Carolina) no no
Hutchinson, Tim (R-Arkansas) yes yes
Hutchison, Kay Bailey (R-Texas) yes yes
Inhofe, James (R-Oklahoma) yes yes
Inouye, Daniel (D-Hawaii) no no
Jeffords, James (R-Vermont) no no
Johnson, Tim (D-South Dakota) no no
Kennedy, Edward (D-Massachusetts) no no
Kerrey, Robert (D-Nebraska) no no
Kerry, John (D-Massachusetts) no no
Kohl, Herb (D-Wisconsin) no no
Kyl, Jon (R-Arizona) yes yes
Landrieu, Mary (D-Louisiana) no no
Lautenberg, Frank (D-New Jersey) no no
Leahy, Patrick (D-Vermont) no no
Levin, Carl (D-Michigan) no no
Lieberman, Joseph (D-Connecticut) no no
Lincoln, Blanche (D-Arkansas) no no
Lott, Trent (R-Mississippi) yes yes
Lugar, Richard (R-Indiana) yes yes
Mack, Connie (R-Florida) yes yes
McCain, John (R-Arizona) yes yes
McConnell, Mitch (R-Kentucky) yes yes
Mikulski, Barbara (D-Maryland) no no
Moynihan, Daniel (D-New York) no no
Murkowski, Frank (R-Alaska) yes yes
Murray, Patty (D-Washington) no no
Nickles, Don (R-Oklahoma) yes yes
Reed, Jack (D-Rhode Island) no no
Reid, Harry (D-Nevada) no no
Robb, Charles (D-Virginia) no no
Roberts, Pat (R-Kansas) yes yes
Rockefeller John (D-West Virginia) no no
Roth, William (R-Delaware) yes yes
Santorum, Rick (R-Pennsylvania) yes yes
Sarbanes, Paul (D-Maryland) no no
Schumer, Charles (D-New York) no no
Sessions, Jeff (R-Alabama) yes yes
Shelby, Richard (R-Alabama) no yes
Smith, Bob (R-New Hampshire) yes yes
Smith, Gordon (R-Oregon) yes yes
Snowe, Olympia (R-Maine) no no
Specter, Arlen (R-Pennsylvania) no no
Stevens, Ted (R-Alaska) no yes
Thomas, Craig (R-Wyoming) yes yes
Thompson, Fred (R-Tennessee) no yes
Thurmond, Strom (R-South Carolina) yes yes
Torricelli, Robert (D-New Jersey) no no
Voinovich, George (R-Ohio) yes yes
Warner, John (R-Virginia) no yes
Wellstone, Paul (D-Minnesota) no no
Wyden, Ron (D-Oregon) no no
PERJURY: No-55, Yes-45
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: No-50, Yes-50
roundtable
Title-50 War and National Defense § 783 states - "It shall be
unlawful for any person knowingly to combine, conspire, or agree
with any other person to perform any act which would substantially
contribute to the establishment within the United States of a
totalitarian dictatorship, the direction and control of which is
to be vested in, or exercised by or under the domination of
control of, any foreign government."
The Council on Foreign Relations are in violation of Title-50 War
and National Defense § 783. The Council on Foreign Relations has
unlawfully and knowingly combined, conspired, and agreed to
substantially contribute to the establishment of one world order
under the totalitarian dictatorship, the direction and the control
of members of Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of
International Affairs, and members of their branch organizations
in various nations throughout the world. That is totalitarianism
on a global scale.
Contact Congress:
http://esotericworldnews.com/apfn.htm
[APFN] 02/12/99 - Birthday - Abraham Lincoln -
"...The people are the masters of both Congress and
courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to
overthrow the men who pervert it!...."
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having
knowledge of [they are giving allegiance to this] the
commission of any treason against them, conceals and does
not, as soon as may be disclosed and make known the same to
the President or to some judge of the United States, or the
governor or to some judge or justice or a particular State, is
guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined not more
$1,000 or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
(June 25 1948, ch 645, 62 Stat. 807) TREASON
APFN GUEST BOOK: http://esotericworldnews.com/apfncont.htm
Record 19
Name: Alex Martinex
From: Miami, FL
Time: 1999-02-04 22:57
Comments: Congrats! Great Information. I just wanted to share with
you my views on the present situation of this country. I believe
that if Congress DOES NOT get rid of Mr. Clinton, RIGHT NOW, WHILE
THEY HAVE HIM ON THE ROPES, our country is in for a lot of trouble.
If they, Congress, DO NOT remove Clinton from office NOW, he will
become our last elected president. He is planning a third term by
changing the 22 Amendment (APFN- SEE HJ 17 IH -
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:H.J.RES.17: )
and he also has the Executive Orders that he needs to put this
country under Martial Law, either due to a real emergency or a
fake one, it makes no difference to him. We know what that
would mean to us all; the loss of every liberty and right that
we have ever had. I hope that I'm wrong, but I truly believe that
"Willy" has his plans all mapped out.
//END//
[APFN] - My pray -----
God loves!
I love like God!
May God's love be with you!
Re: Research by James Montgomery 08/05/1996
Knowledge if Freedom BBS 1-910-869-0780 - 24/hrs - 28,000 Baud
"The United States Is Still A British Colony" A Documentary
review of Charters and Treaties.
"Esquire - In English Law. A title of dignity next above
gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office given to
sheriffs, sergeants, and Barristers at law, justice of the
peace, and other." Blacks Law Dictionary fourth ed. p 641
On December 2, 1817 John Quincy Adams, then Secretary of State,
wrote to Buck (an attorney) regarding the position Buck had
been assigned. The letter reads:
... if it should be the option of the Government that the
acceptance on your part of the commission under which it was
granted did not interfere with your citizenship.
It is the opinion of the Executive that under the 13th
amendment to the constitution by the acceptance of such an
appointment from any foreign Government, a citizen of the
United States ceases to enjoy that character, and becomes
incapable of hold any office of trust or profit under the
United States or either of them..." J.Q.A.
By virtue of these titles and honors, and special
privileges, lawyers have assumed political and economic
advantages over the majority of citizens. A majority may
vote, but only a minority (lawyers) may run for political
office.
It is said that of the 545 from the three branches of
U.S. Government, that only 34 are not members of the
American Bar Association, A Union!
One last thought to ponder:
I shall exert every faculty I process in aiding to
prevent the Constitution from be nullified, destroyed,
or impaired; and even though I shall see it fail, I will
still, with a VOICE feeble, perhaps, but earnest as ever
issued from human lips, and with extinguish, call on the
PEOPLE to come to its rescue.
--- Daniel Webster
"We must obey GOD rather than men"
Acts 5:29
APFN NEW ----COMPILED RESEARCH:
TITLE: "THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED OR PUBLISHED"
AND EXPOSE' OF THE LAWYERS SECRET OATH
Excrete:
All the courts of this once great land have been changed
starting with the Supremen Court decision of 1938 in
Erie R.R. v. Thompkins...(re: Ben Freeman tapes of 1989)
The UCC is the law merchant's: code for the administration
of the bankruptcy. The UCC is now the new law of the land as
far as the courts are concerned. Washington D.C. adopted the
Uniform Commercial Code in 1963, just six weeks or so after
Kennedy was killed.
The American Bar Association is a franchise on the Lawyer's
Guild of Great Britain....
Final note: Every wonder why "WE" have never been able to
get "OUR" case in a court.... all the information in the
above package....
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE - ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/overview.html
begin:vcard
n:Vardon;Kenneth
tel;cell:702-217-7671
tel;fax:702-435-6674
tel;home:702.435.7671
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.globalhealthtrax.com/5087/
org:Stay In Touch Communications
adr:;;3342 S. Sandhill #9-233;Las Vegas,;Nevada;[89121];USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Consultant
note;quoted-printable:Without Justice, there is JUST_US!=0D=0A
fn:American Patriot Friends Network American Patriot Friends Network
end:vcard
