-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/17/99 11:57:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
As for myself, I think I'd prefer a "real" New Yorker. And I think Hillary
would be setting
herself up for an ordeal by fire--she could be ripped to shreds....as every
other female
candidate has been. >>
Isn't it just possible that Hillary might be able to appeal to both sides and
win an election? What did you think of the guy she would be replacing? What
about Chisholm? I barely remember her, and I don't know what she
accomplished. I did once see her interviewed by Dick Cavett, and I thought
she was okay. Did she get badly battered? Prudy
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
