-Caveat Lector- kt wrote: <<Which part of the Mena operation do you not understand?>> The way you Clintonites present everything is that your buddy Clinton has done nothing more than hang his weenee out for some female to suck on, nothing could be further from the truth. You stand by supporting him while he sells us out to the highest bidder (Red Chinese). I'm not going to list all his crimes again since none of you even read them.... anti-Clinton is verboten. kt wrote: <<The media is controlled by the same corporate interests that control the Republicans and the Democrats. That political reality cares little about these "left" and "conservative" word games.>> "Conservative" to me means a strict interpretation of the Constitution... something both parties ignore. Selective use of laws allows the media to be controlled. Corporations should have their power taken away by revoking their charters for bribing officials and officials can be recalled for accepting bribes. Clinton takes bribes even from foreign countries hostile to the US such as Communist China... do you deny that also? Stokes wrote: > Reagan and Bush have nothing to do with a discussion about Clinton,< kt wrote: <You can only say this by ignoring the facts.> Again trying to change the subject. Reagan and Bush are no longer in office, you cannot impeach them. However, if Clinton is impeached for his drug involvement and bribe taking... this may open the door for cleaning out all of Congress to include the "Evil Republicans" why can't you see that? > they were not subject to impeachment no matter what you say...Clinton is. kt wrote: <<The occupant of the White House is fully aware of the non-electoral, extra- legal processes that put him there. I don't cheer Clinton's weaseling out of impeachment (and he will; no way to get 2/3s in the Senate), and I almost admire your naivete in insisting that it was different with Reagan/Bush. But at the half-century mark, that naivete can only be willful.>> Maybe the naiveness is yours... Has Clinton ever told the truth in anything? Why do you believe that he has the best interests of the country in mind when he takes bribes from foreign countries? Bush may have talked about the NWO, but Clinton is ushering it in with a red carpet, our money, and soon our blood. Regards, Bob Stokes DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
