-Caveat Lector-
"J. Hoffa" wrote:
>
> I do not stake my reputation on anything of the sort. I hope free energy devices
> are popping up all over, but it seems that you have taken the circumstantial
> evidence of on-going scientific investigation and physics symposiums
> and mixed in some sci-fi heresay to try to prove what even you cannot be sure
> is a reality.
>
> In closing, I found your remarks uninformed in a very empirical, scientific
> sense of the word. Discussions and investigations do not make reality.
> Only the naive and truly uninformed are impressed by scientific discussions
> on the POTENTIAL feasibility of free energy devices.
***
All very true.
> If one of these
> guys actually builds, tests, and verifies an indisputable free energy device,
> you'll know about it. They'll get the Nobel Prize for Physics and be touted
> in every publication across the globe whether scientific journal or tabloid.
>
***
Up until now I was completely with you. I, too, do not believe that
anyone has succeeded in producing a free energy device. However, I am
not so sure that these last two sentences are true. There are two
reasons I believe this. First, there is too much belief that free energy
is not possible within the laws of physics. There would simply be too
much friction for this to be accepted right away. Sure there would be
some who would accept the reality fairly quickly, but what of all those
who will not even accept the possibility at present? Secondly, I believe
that there are economic forces which would work to keep such news out of
the mainstream media.
> Try to be more objective and skeptical yourself. Then you may be able to
> separate the fairy-physics of Star Trek from what is actually being done.
>
***
Good advice for many, but not for all. Some are already masters at skepticism.
Howard Davis
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
