-Caveat Lector-

on 12/24/02 10:02 PM, flw at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> -Caveat Lector-
>
>> Morals? Both sides have committed evil atrocious acts. Again I state ( I
>> know it's hard for this one to get through)- there is no moral high
> ground
>> to be had from any side here.
>
> You are being coy and equivicating.By equating the acts of the oppressor
> with the oppressed - the occupied with the occupier, you ARE expressing
> a moral opinion - a bad moral opinion. Merely throwing up your hands
> and saying 'a pox on both your houses' condones the basic evil of a
> brutal occupation and the illegal annexation of another people's land
> and heritage.
>


No. I condemn any brutal oppression.
I also condemn murder and terrorism.

See no equivocating. Nothing coy.


As to illegal - I'm not so sure. It was British land to give.
Other land was lost and gained in war. Are you going to disclaim all lands
won by conquest? That's ok with me, as long as we do it across the board. I
won't really miss Texas, and if they become Mexicans they can't send us any
more Presidents.

We bought Manhattan, but the rest of you motherfukkas might think about
packing your bags.





>> Maybe there is a rule that 2 people can't post information from the same
>> article. I must have missed it. Mea culpa.
>
> But of course you did not simply 'post information.' Rather you posted
> an editorial attacking my post as somehow improper because I only
> quoted that part of the article reporting the murder of the 11 year old
> girl by Israeli soldiers. Obviously I have no debate with one reading,
> commenting upon or posting the entire article since I intentionally
> cited the specific article reference.
> flw
>


Improper? I repeat - the word I used was "brilliant"

I reread my initial post again, to be sure - can you show me my editorial
attack? My claims of unfair? Improper?


-- --------- ---- ------- ----- ----------- ---------------------------
Complete liberty of contradicting our opinion is the very condition which
justifies us in assuming its truth.


John Stuart Mill




NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to