-Caveat Lector-

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 11:02 AM, Euphorian wrote:

-Caveat Lector-

3/13/2003 10:36:46 AM, Ray Boeche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"" My biggest question is how do you construe anything America has done
in the past, or intends to do in the near future, as "empire building"?

"" We have always striven to liberate countries, give the people a
voice,
and then let them deal with their internal affairs; not dominate or
subjugate others.""

In case you missed the last the history of the last fifty years, the
U.S. has
been the most successful occupation force in the memory of the World
(the Soviets collapsed a while back, in effect, giving up their claim
to any
prizes).  The pretext was liberation and protection.  With the advent
of
ICBMs, the only reason for maintaining a ground force in Europe was to
preposition forces for subsequent occupation should the "Cold" War have
heated up.

Now, if you have any qualms about this analysis, think about what the
realtions with the French have  been since DeGaulle.  Recall that he
was
the de facto leader of the French in Engaland during the Second Great
War.  Recall he led the Free French back into France.  Recall he later
became the national leader who then escorted to the Americans to the
nearet borders.  He understood (all-too-well from his experiences with
the
Germans) the difference between "liberation" (which was his intention)
and "occupation" which was what happened.  France has not been really
popular with the Americans' policy makers ever since.  DeGaulle
liberated
his country and people got PO'd.  Germany's next, followed by Turkey.
Note how the Americans have "allowed" them to voice their opinion and
conduct their internal affairs.
And let's not discuss Afghanistan in this context.  The only thing
that was
liberated there was the opium crop.
"Liberation" does NOT result in the House of Representatives taking
some
jingoistic tack of renaming a basically American food.  This act was
supposed to be a "symbol' but, if anything, they did the French a
favour:
no self-respecting French person would eat such gastronomically
inferior
substandard gut stuffers as a "french fry".



My question remains - "How do you construe anything America has done in the past, or intends to do in the near future, as "empire building"?

Let's put aside the fact that DeGaulle and the Free French marched back
into France under covering fire of American troops. The French have
been screwed up since the so-called Enlightenment.

The only reason Germany exists as a democracy (albeit a socialist
democracy) is because the US presence in West Berlin and West Germany
kept the Soviet Union from expanding their very real empire.

Once again, where is this empire we've built? Name the countries we
control.

Ray

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to