-Caveat Lector-
The point here is that there is no Constitutional basis for EOs. What I
have heard (not verifiable in laws) is that an EO takes effect in 30 days if
it is not disputed by Congress, then it becomes law. The Executive branch
has no Constitutional authority to create laws, only the legislative branch.
Clinton's power play (EO 11083)
on federalism is the only one that has been disputed recently.
The paragraph below explains EO standing:
"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having
the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the
time of it's enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so
branding it... No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no
courts are bound to enforce it."
-- 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256
Regards,
Bob Stokes
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
