-Caveat Lector-
Just to also briefly add:
 
----- Original Message -----
From: iNFoWaRZ
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Occult Symbolism: As American as Baseball


The fact is America had TWO major influences in it's founding, Christianity and the Occult. 
But who was prominent in writing the laws which guaranteed freedom for all. 
 
The Christian sects, whilst many were fleeing persecution, none-the-less came with the baggage of autocratic Catholic Europe.
 
Their ideas of a Christian Social Order were affected by their Catholic heritage; however hard they tried to diss it.
 
These Protestant Christian refugees were a scattered coterie whose ideas varied widely and were in the primitive formulative stages.
 
The Deists on the other hand, had a well thought-out Social agenda.
 
Their innate humanism, their suspicion of despots, autocratic monarchs and popes, forged a set of values to ensure that liberty for all citizenry would be a prime objective.
 
No one would say their endeavours were perfect or executed without problems and even a measure of hypocrisy. Yet their aims were noble and their course led to progressive societal liberties. 
 
If Christians had been a well organised hierarchic group, they would have swayed the early politics of the US and without doubt would have transplanted a similar spirit to that of Catholic Europe into the new world.
 
Their lack of a cohesive body, their fear of religious persecution, as experienced in Catholic Europe, and their dictum of individual freedom; "the Liberty of the Gospel," were more of an influence toward social liberties than if they were a large cohesive dominant group, who probably would have replicated a system not unlike the one they had fled, if for no other reason than that they new no other system.
 
I cite for example, the history of the converted Protestant John Calvin, who after gaining autonomy from Catholicism and gaining political power for his sect, mimicked his former indoctrination in the Catholic Social Order; and continued to burn those he considered heretics.
 
The same would have occurred in America were it not for prominent men, fashioned by the Enlightenment, who sought political restraint and tolerance for and by all religions.
The only reason the American Revolution succeeded and the French Revolution was a total utter bloody murderous failure was that the French Revolution was not tempered by Christianity.
I can agree to a limited extant; as per comments above.
 
The reason the French Revolution was so bloody; was because of the 1,000 year rule of clericalism and the vast hatred promulgated by clerics against the Enlightenment.
 
Anything which was dubbed heresy or anti-clericalism, was stigmatised as the work of the devil. It was a world of fear and hate, of witches and werewolves; a demon haunted world, ruled by the clerics, who promoted any type of base superstition to keep the gullible in a state of soul and psyche-paralysis.
 
The ecclesiastical harp-pluckers likewise held sway over education. The men who had arisen, and would take the reigns of the Revolution, were the same men who the monks had endowed with their potent superstition and world-denying hatreds.  
 
The revolutionaries turned on the clerics; and the type of despotic society these superstitious world-denying holy men had constructed for over a millennia. Indeed, it is a by-word that France was the papacies oldest and most treasured daughter.
 
Whilst the men who carried out the bloodiest aspects of the Revolution must bear responsibility for their own actions, having men kept in societal dog-cages, in spiritual chains, and with clerics as their masters; was sure to make men erupt. Mad dogs aren't naturally born, they are generally made. 
 
Rousseau himself asserted in The Social Contract, circa 1762 that, ‘‘man was born free, but he is everywhere in chains". As these men sought emancipation from tyrants and despotic clerics; and whilst one cannot condone their bloodiest actions; one can to some extent empathise with their rage.        
The Christian influence won America Liberty, whereas the Occult won France License.
I believe otherwise, as per comments above. This "Christian influence," was minor, likewise there was no organised powerful "Occult influence" in France either.
 
The men of the Enlightenment were secularists, humanists and deists in search of freedom and knowledge, which was hitherto forbidden them by clericalism.  
 
It was the minimal influence of Christians in America that assisted those that had a more powerful sense of individual liberty; they were mostly Secularists and Deists who prevented an American blood-bath.
 
The early Protestant sects, fleeing Catholic persecution, were not a hierarchal politicly organised body. Their own fears of religious persecution, which they experienced under European potentates and popes; looked for an America zone-free of king and pope.
 
The idea of some endemic 'occult conspiracy' is pure fantasy. It originated in the lunatic mind of brainwashed, superstitious clergymen who see themselves harassed by evil angels, spirits, ghosts and devils at every turn.     
And over two hundred years later America has lost it's Liberty to License, a direct result of the Occult conspiracy.
Not plausible-(cf above). Today, almost all Americans say they believe in the Christian god. The mores of America are Christian and it is the paramount and dominant religion of America.
 
Since the rise and rise of Christian-ism, and particularly the massive growth of Catholicism (a good portion of illegal US border-jumpers are Catholic invaders), and her Jesuit political academia; Bill Clinton for example, was an agent of the Jesuit Georgetown University; -- America has become, more paranoid and progressively more warlike whilst the alleged Christian moral majority has increased. 
 
Statist, Fundamentalist Christianity, like any Fundamentalist religion, by its very paranoid nature; its world-hating and human-denying theologies; invariably breeds hate and war wherever it takes root.       
The Catholic/Jesuit church is one side of the coin and Freemasonry is the other side, and that coin's name is Mystery, Babylon and these supposed enemies of one another have the exact same roots.  And both are the enemy of true Liberty.
Rampant, monolithic Catholicism is hardly the flip side of a bunch of a bunch of old fogies burning about in wheelchairs looking for a charity to support.
 
The Masons are pretty much a non-event any longer. Their ranks have been diminishing for decades, whilst various religious superstitions have skyrocketed, which in itself may be telling. 
 
On parts of the Euro continent, given their symbols and emblems, one could mistake some Masonic Orders for the temples of the Jesuits.
 
The recent conflagrations in Europe have only served the pope and the Vatican, whose former fiefdoms have progressively been revived.
 
The European Union, whilst oft in the guise of secularist ambitions, seeks the revival of a Europe under the religious tutelage of the pope and Vatican.
 
One of the big wigs of NATO and the EU is Javier Solana Madariaga, a Roman Catholic Spaniard who bears the name of one of the founding members of the Jesuit Society.
 
During the Yugoslav War he was conveniently the leader (Head) of NATO. In one of Solana's speeches he claimed the EU is, "... the Union that represents the re-unification of Europe."

But when was Europe ever 'unified' in such terms except when Roman Catholic and under the heel of Catholic potentates and popes. 

Solana's words are clearly an echo of the words and ideals of the man he gives allegiance to:   
"A united Europe is no longer a dream. It is not utopian memory from the Middle Ages. The events that we are witnessing show that this goal can be reached".
The above words are the words of the pope. Solana, is the pope's man who follows after the pope's behest.  The pope wants to revive the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle (Dark) Ages, this age incorporated the Inquisition, and the pope asserts that this era was a utopia! (cf NEW YORK TIMES, APRIL 23, 1990).
 
Catholic Hitler too wanted a united Europe under the Reich, which means Empire.
 
Hitler was taught by clerics and monks and died a loyal son of Rome and a sycophant of the pope. He has never even been excommunicated.
Dave.    
 
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to