-Caveat Lector-

Ten years later, there are still important lessons.

By Timothy Lynch



Ruby Ridge" used to refer to a geographical location in the state of Idaho,
but after an incident that took place there ten years ago today, the phrase
has come to refer to a scandalous series of events that opened the eyes of
many people to the inner workings of the federal government, including the
vaunted Federal Bureau of Investigation. Now that ten years have passed, the
feds will accelerate their ongoing effort to "move forward" and have the
scandal declared "ancient history." But the Ruby Ridge episode should not be
soon forgotten.


On August 21, 1992 a paramilitary unit of the U.S. Marshals Service ventured
onto the 20-acre property known as Ruby Ridge. A man named Randy Weaver
owned the land and he lived there with his wife, children, and a family
friend, Kevin Harris. There was an outstanding warrant for Weaver's arrest
for a firearms offense and the marshals were surveilling the premises. When
the family dog noticed the marshals sneaking around in the woods, it began
to bark wildly. Weaver's 14-year-old boy, Sammy, and Kevin Harris proceeded
to grab their rifles because they thought the dog had come upon a wild
animal.

A firefight erupted when a marshal shot and killed the dog. Enraged that the
family pet had been cut down for no good reason, Sammy shot into the woods
at the unidentified trespasser. Within a few minutes, two human beings were
shot dead: Sammy Weaver and a marshal. Harris and the Weaver family
retreated to their cabin and the marshals retreated from the mountain and
called the FBI for assistance.

During the night, FBI snipers took positions around the Weaver cabin. There
is no dispute about the fact that the snipers were given illegal "shoot to
kill" orders. Under the law, police agents can use deadly force to defend
themselves and others from imminent attack, but these snipers were
instructed to shoot any adult who was armed and outside the cabin,
regardless of whether the adult posed a threat or not. The next morning, an
FBI agent shot and wounded Randy Weaver. A few moments later, the same agent
shot Weaver's wife in the head as she was standing in the doorway of her
home holding a baby in her arms. The FBI snipers had not yet announced their
presence and had not given the Weavers an opportunity to peacefully
surrender.

After an eleven-day standoff, Weaver agreed to surrender. The FBI told the
world that it had apprehended a band of dangerous racists. The New York
Times was duped into describing a family (two parents, three children) and
one adult friend as "an armed separatist brigade." The Department of Justice
proceeded to take over the case, charging Weaver and Harris with conspiracy
to commit "murder." Federal prosecutors asked an Idaho jury to impose the
death penalty. Instead, the jury acquitted Weaver and Harris of all of the
serious criminal charges. Embarrassed by the outcome, FBI officials told the
world that there would be a thorough review of the case, but the Bureau
closed ranks and covered up the mess. FBI director Louis Freeh went so far
as to promote one of the agents involved, Larry Potts, to the Bureau's
number-two position.

When Weaver sued the federal government for the wrongful death of his wife
and son, the government that had tried to kill him twice now sought an
out-of-court settlement. In August 1995 the U.S. government paid the Weaver
family $3.1 million. On the condition that his name not be used in an
article, one Department of Justice official told the Washington Post that if
Weaver's suit had gone to trial in Idaho, he probably would have been
awarded $200 million.

With the intervening events at Waco, more and more people began to question
the veracity of Department of Justice and FBI accounts and whether the
federal government had the capacity to hold its own agents accountable for
criminal misconduct. Like the Watergate scandal, however, the response to
the initial illegality turned out to be even more shocking and disturbing.

When an FBI supervisor, Michael Kahoe, admitted to destroying evidence and
obstructing justice, he was eventually prosecuted but only after being kept
on the FBI payroll until his 50th birthday - so that he would be eligible
for his retirement pension. And when Larry Potts was finally forced into
retirement, FBI officials flew into Washington from around the country for
his going-away bash. Those officials claimed to be on "official business" so
they billed the taxpayers for the trip. After the fraud was leaked to the
press by some anonymous and apparently sickened FBI agent, the merry band of
partygoers were not discharged from service. Instead, a letter was placed in
their personnel file, chiding them for "inattention to detail."

An Idaho prosecutor did bring manslaughter charges against the FBI sniper
who shot Vicki Weaver. That move really outraged the feds because they
insisted that they were capable of policing their own - so long as they did
not have any outside "interference."

The Department of Justice was so disturbed by the indictment of its agent
that they dispatched the solicitor general to a federal appellate court to
argue that the charges should be dismissed. (The solicitor general
ordinarily only makes oral argument to the Supreme Court). The solicitor
general told the judicial panel that even if the evidence supported the
charges, the case should be thrown out because "federal law enforcement
agents are privileged to do what would otherwise be unlawful if done by a
private citizen." The appeals court rejected that sweeping argument for a
license to kill, but by the time that ruling came down last June, a new
local prosecutor was in office in Boundary County, Idaho, and he announced
that it was time to put this whole unpleasant episode behind us and to "move
on." Thus, the criminal case against the sniper was dropped.

A new generation of young people who have never heard of Ruby Ridge are now
emerging from the public-school system and are heading off to college and
will thereafter begin their careers in business, education, journalism,
government, and other fields. This generation will find it hard to fathom
that the federal government could have killed a boy and an unarmed woman and
then tried to deceive everyone about what had actually occurred and, in some
instances, rationalize what did occur. That is why it is important to
remember Ruby Ridge. Someone needs to remind the young people (and everyone
else) that it really did happen - and that it will happen again if the
government is not kept on a short leash. No one will learn about the
incident when they tour the FBI facility in Washington. It goes unmentioned
for some reason.

- Timothy Lynch is director of the Cato Institute's Project on Criminal
Justice.


__________________________________________________________________
Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to