-Caveat Lector- William Bacon,
Just as with anything, CO2 in moderation is useful to life. CO2 in excess, however, is a greenhouse gas which traps the heat from the earth that would otherwise escape back into space. On Venus the surface temperature is so hot that lead is molten, water evaporates instantly, and life is impossible. This is not from the planet's proximity to the sun, but from the excessive CO2 in the atmosphere, that which you claim is the "basis of life." During the same time that we have added a huge unnatural burden of CO2 to the atmosphere - by burning in a hundred and fifty years the fossil fuel remains of plants and animals that would have in natural decomposition added their CO2 to the atmosphere over millions of years - we have concurrently cut down the vast majority of our rainforests, old growth forests and grasslands which might have helped to absorb at least some of this excess CO2 through photosynthesis, as you suggest. The way things are now, the balance is so out of kilter that we face a potential runaway greenhouse effect. I am a science teacher not an "econonazi" or oil company propagandist. I would be happy to explain the science of the greenhouse effect to you in terms simple enough for the undereducated to comprehend, but you appear to have made up your mind without benefit of science. Your treatise below twists facts to a ridiculous extent in order to try to prove what is in essence an enormous obfusc! ation. Your attempt to link environmentalists to people who would cut the rainforest, destroy whales and starve humans is so pathetic it is laughable. And to say that fossil fuels are "superrenewable" exposes the extent of your ignorance about how they are formed. Hopefully others can see through the ruse. I'm sure my 7th and 8th graders would easily enough. MQuijano -----Original Message----- >From: "William A. Bacon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sep 1, 2006 5:33 AM >To: CTRL@LISTSERV.AOL.COM >Subject: [CTRL] [JBirch] Re: MIT's inconvenient scientist - a response > >-Caveat Lector- > >Subject: [JBirch] Re: MIT's inconvenient scientist - a response > >This one is important: Global Warming is largely about creating the kind of >Global Control that we oppose. It is easier to demonstrate as hogwash than >much other Econazi or Insider garbage. It is an achilles heel for our enemy. > > Central to the global warming paradigm is the idea that carbon dioxide is a > "pollutant." Carbon dioxide is the basis of Life on Earth. We all learned > that about third grade. Carbon dioxide and water are what a plant uses to > build all its tissues in photosynthesis. You do know that. So does the > public. You also know, right along with "Joe Sixpack," that all animals > depend ultimately on plants for food. You do know that meat eaters eat mostly > herbivores, and that even fish who eat fish who eat fish ultimately get all > their food from the lowest organism on the food chain, which was a plant. You > do know: that plant needed carbon dioxide to feed all those fish. > > Anybody who says CO2 is a pollutant says Life is a pollutant. He is against > the recovery of the great whales, against the preservation of the rainforests > (forests especially benefit from higher CO2 levels), and in favor of > starving human beings to death. > > *** > The article also mentioned the difficulty of getting a minority opinion > heard. This difficulty is magnified by Search Engines. I learned --from my > local JBS chapter-- of a marvellous video called "The Greening of Planet > Earth," produced by The Western Fuels Conference, and bought it from the > internet. I looked it up recently and the first 100 items at least were > sneering of Econazis about how this was produced by fossil fuel money. I > simply could not find the opposition on a web search. > > This is not the intention of the search engines, especially not Google, > whose raison d'etre is to make all human knowledge available to everybody. If > anybody has any ideas on how search engines could bring up opposing sides > more easily, let them know. > > *** > So how is all this an achilles heel for the Insiders? It is an avenue to > discredit them. > > I have seen suggestions that the "fossil fuels are polluting" hysteria is > actually paid for by the big oil companies via funding to enviro > organizations. They jack up gasoline prices with Econazi help. I would like > access to the evidence on this, as it is a major part of my Life Mission to > expose all this. > > Fossil fuels are the ONLY fuels that increase the life on Earth. They > probably increase health and lifespan. And they are NOT nonrenewable. When > wood is burnt, the carbon is released into the atmosphere and new trees grow > next year from the CO2 and the sunshine. All know this. > > When fossil fuels are burnt, they release NEW carbon dioxide into the > biocycle and a whole new tree can grow, or corn for superior diesel oil, etc. > Fossil fuels are SUPERRENEWABLE. There will be more Life and abundance on > Earth if you use and promote this term. > > >--------------------------------- >Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small >Business. > >www.ctrl.org >DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER >========== >CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic >screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are >sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis- >directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with >major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. >That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and >always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no >credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. > >Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. >======================================================================== >Archives Available at: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ ><A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A> >======================================================================== >To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: >SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: >SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Om www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
