-Caveat Lector-
I sincerely hope that Clinton isn't messing with China because of the
surfacing evidence of nuclear secrets going to them pretty much with his
blessing. Of all the 'Wag the Dog' scenarios this could be a very costly
one played out on US soil. China can do serious damage to the US. I can't
believe that Clinton is allowed to get away with this nonsense which leads
me to believe that he has tremendous support to behave in such a stupid
manner and get away with it. IMHO
Hilary
----------
> From: Brian Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [CTRL] Reports Show Embassy Deliberately Bombed (fwd)
> Date: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 8:55 AM
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> REPORTS SHOW EMBASSY DELIBERATELY BOMBED
> ========================================
>
> (CNNS, 05/11/99) -- It is becoming increasingly clear that Ru
> Mills' source was correct when he stated, on May 8, 1999, that
> "NATO purposely targeted the Chinese Embassy. It was done to
> derail the peace initiative being put forward by the Russians and
> the Chinese."
>
> Ru Mills, special correspondent to Conspiracy Nation News Service
> (CNNS), uses a pseudonym which covers her true name, a name
> well-known in intelligence circles. Her May 8th report, "NATO
> Purposely Targeted Chinese Embassy," was published by CNNS on May
> 9th, under the title "'Ru Mills': Embassy Hit On Purpose" and is
> available in our archives. (See below for URL.)
>
> Reports now coming in from other sources tend to confirm that the
> bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade was not an accident.
>
> A story from Itar-Tass and reported on by CNNS on May 9th,
> detailed how the USA sometimes operates independently from NATO
> leadership in the current Yugoslav conflict. Basing their
> information, in part, on a report in the London Telegraph
> newspaper, Itar-Tass stated that U.S. B-2 bombers which
> demolished the Chinese embassy in Belgrade may indicate a "war
> within a war," where the U.S., for covert reasons of its own,
> sometimes operates independently of NATO. (See, "Avalanche Of
> New Data On Balkans War," CNNS, 5/9/99.)
>
> The May 9th report by Itar-Tass ("US bombers target China embassy
> in Belgrade for strikes"), also pointed out "that the bombing of
> the [Chinese embassy] was conducted by a special force of the
> U.S. strategic aviation, which is not subordinated to the NATO
> command and which flew from the American territory..."
>
> Sun Yuxi, a spokesperson for the Chinese government, speaking
> from Belgrade, now states that the "embassy was clearly
> targeted." Yuxi "specified that several missiles hit the embassy
> from different directions very precisely, and that both buildings
> in the embassy compound had been hit." [1] If, as the Chinese
> spokesperson says, both buildings in the compound were precisely
> hit, this indicates that whoever controlled the bombing had a
> very exact idea of what they were shooting at. That would
> controvert U.S. claims that a "bad map" caused the tragedy.
>
> German political scientist Erich Schmidt-Eenboom, according to a
> report by the Tanjug News Wire, concurs that the "bombing of the
> Chinese embassy in Belgrade was no mistake but a sabotage
> directed by USA..." [2] Schmidt-Eenboom calls the CIA "bad map"
> story "ridiculous," and adds that "such mistakes are impossible.
> The most reasonable explanation would be that the USA wanted to
> sabotage the declaration by the G-8 foreign ministers concerning
> the principles for the peaceful solution on the Kosovo crises
> because including Russia and the United Nations in resolving of
> the problem wouldn't suit [USA's] wishes."
>
> In an uncanny circumstance, Russian president Boris Yeltsin last
> week, a few days prior to the bombing of the Chinese embassy, had
> departed from the text of a prepared speech and exclaimed, "Just
> let Clinton, a little bit, accidentally, send a missile, we'll
> answer immediately!" [3] Had Russian intelligence picked up
> hints of what Clinton/USA might do? Was Yeltsin's dire warning
> the reason why the Chinese embassy, and not a Russian embassy,
> was picked as the target?
>
> Relying on a London Times article, Tanjug News Wire reports that
> some British analysts believe the embassy bombing was a CIA
> operation. The British analysts reportedly are convinced that
> the embassy was not bombarded due to a "bad map" but "due to
> special plans of CIA..." [4] A "war within a war," a "parallel
> war," with USA having its own hidden agenda, separate from NATO's
> purported rationale for the bombing of Yugoslavia -- that idea
> also is gaining increasing credibility.
>
> Summing up, we have Boris Yeltsin departing from the text of his
> prepared speech, and having a sudden fit: "Clinton better not
> hit us -- or else!" Only days later, the Chinese (not the
> Russian) embassy gets destroyed. Almost immediately, Ru Mills is
> contacted by a source who assures her the embassy bombing was not
> an accident. Mills issues her report, and scoops all other news
> outlets. Thereafter, other reports begin to trickle in
> indicating that, yes, the bombing of the Chinese embassy was *no*
> *accident*, but was done to derail peace talks, as Mills also had
> already reported.
>
> ---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
> [1] "Chinese spokesman says Peking sharply condemns brutal NATO
> act." Tanjug News Wire, 5/11/99.
> [2] "Attack on Chinese Embassy - American Sabotage." Tanjug News
> Wire, datelined Bonn, 5/10/99.
> [3] Report by Dana Lewis, apparently from MSNBC. The report of
> Yeltsin's strange outburst was also carried by Matt Drudge at his
> website.
> [4] "'Sunday Times' - Chinese Embassy was on the target list."
> Tanjug News Wire, 5/9/99. (Also titled, "USA hit Chinese embassy
> on purpose.")
>
> --
> CNNS (Conspiracy Nation News Service) is an INDEPENDENT news
> outlet, not owned by anyone. (But of course, we would say that,
> wouldn't we?) BEWARE THE CFR! BEWARE THE CIA! BEWARE THE KNIGHTS!
> http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
> http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cnns.html
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
