-Caveat Lector-

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_franke/19990709_xcdfr_is_income_.shtml

FRIDAY
JULY 09
1999
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 THE POWER TO DESTROY
Is income tax legal?
Evidence suggests
16th Amendment never ratified

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Editor's note: This is the first of a two-part series on the validity of the
income tax.

By David Franke
© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON -- Evidence strongly suggests that the 16th Amendment, which
establishes the income tax, was not approved properly as required by the
Constitution and was fraudulently ratified.
"If this evidence is true, the income tax is the greatest hoax ever
perpetrated on the American people," says Robert L. Schulz.

Schulz is head of We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education,
Inc., a New York state-based organization that hosted a symposium in
Washington last week on the topic, "Are the Income and Social Security Taxes
Legal?" The foundation twice sent registered letters to President Clinton,
Senate President Pro Tempore Trent Lott, and House Speaker Dennis Hastert,
as well as the Internal Revenue Service, asking them to send representatives
to the symposium who could explain the government's case for the legality of
the income tax. They received no response, much less a speaker, but part of
the conference was covered by C-SPAN and that resulted in hundreds of
friendly responses from viewers.

A key speaker at the symposium was William J. Benson, author of a two-volume
investigative report on the ratification of the 16th Amendment entitled "The
Law That Never Was."

Benson was a special agent with the Illinois Department of Revenue for 10
years. He was fired after uncovering evidence of corruption in the agency.
It took more than six years to get his case into a federal court, but the
jury awarded him "a large amount," he says, for violations of his First
Amendment rights.

What followed his victory is an even more amazing story. Benson delved into
the history of the federal income tax -- the granddaddy of the state income
taxes -- and became suspicious. He noted irregularities in the ratification
of the 16th Amendment and pressed on in his research.

That research took him to the archives in the state capitals of each of the
48 states that were part of the United States in 1913, when the 16th
Amendment was passed by the Congress. The Constitution requires ratification
of amendments by three-fourths of the states, and Benson's meticulous
research says this was never properly done. Secretary of State Philander
Knox declared the amendment ratified on the basis of a report from his
solicitor, but that report was "fraudulent," says Benson.

In each state archive, Benson uncovered the records of that state's
consideration of the proposed amendment. To present a legally acceptable
case "you must have documents that are notarized and certified," he
explains. "Otherwise they're considered hearsay in court."

All total, Benson collected 17,000 documents, all properly notarized and
certified by officials of the states. And what they reveal is shocking.

The ratification required by at least 36 states -- three-fourths of the 48
states then in existence -- has to be identical to the amendment passed by
Congress. Benson cites federal documents affirming that for state approval
to be acceptable, neither words nor punctuation can be changed. And the
states may not violate their own state constitutions in ratifying the
amendment.

Of the 48 states, here's the story:


Eight states (Rhode Island, Utah, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Kentucky,
Florida, Virginia and Pennsylvania) did not approve or ratify the amendment.

Texas and Louisiana were forbidden by their own state constitutions to
empower the federal government to tax.

Vermont and Massachusetts rejected the amendment with a recorded vote count,
and only later declared it passed without a recorded vote after the
amendment was declared ratified by Knox.

Tennessee, Ohio, Mississippi, California and Washington violated their state
constitutions in their ratification procedures.

Minnesota did not send any copy of its resolution to Knox, let alone a
signed and sealed one, as required.

And Oklahoma, Georgia and Illinois made unacceptable changes in wording.
(Some of the above states also made such changes, in addition to their other
unacceptable procedures.)
Take 48 states, deduct these 21, and you have proper ratification by only 27
states -- far less than the required 36.

Benson's story doesn't end with the compilation and publication of his
research. As expected, his evidence that our present system of government is
based on a fraud did not get a friendly reception in Washington. Benson says
a senatorial aide attempted to bribe him. Suppress all copies of your books,
he was told, and "you will live in comfort for the rest of your life."

Benson didn't cooperate, and he landed in prison on income tax charges.

"Going to prison was not easy," he told the symposium, "but because I had
written volume one and was speaking about it, the government was determined
to put me in prison."

And that wasn't all. Benson was on prescribed medication for encephalitis.
That medication was confiscated, and "four guards and three nurses entered
my cell and forcibly injected me with different medication." As a result, he
spent nearly two years in prison in a wheelchair.

"I now have to use a cane and walker, and often a wheelchair," Benson said,
"all because of the federal government."

An appellate court reversed Benson's conviction, and he was free after 15
months and five days. But, ignoring prohibitions of double jeopardy, the
Feds clamped him in prison again. And took away his medication again.

This time he was in jail only 22 days. His wife had appealed to Congress,
and after a congressional inquiry the prison authorities stopped his
overmedication and returned him to his original prescribed medication. The
judge who had jailed him was furious when presented with evidence that the
government's actions were unlawful, and ordered him released.

The latest chapter in Benson's saga is the counterattack.

"As soon as I get back to Illinois I'm suing them -- every one of them,"
Benson told WorldNetDaily -- and he started listing them: four U.S.
attorneys, a first assistant U.S. attorney, and assistant U.S. attorney. All
except the judge, that is. "I could sue the judge -- no question -- but I'm
not going to do that," Benson added.

"Fear is the worst thing you face," said Benson of his prison experiences.
And now it's time for the prosecutors who were his persecutors to be afraid.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Monday: Part 2 on the symposium regarding the legality of the income tax.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
David Franke is a new Washington-based WorldNetDaily contributing editor for
technology and Y2K issues. He can be reached by email.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 This page was last built 7/9/99; 1:54:34 AM    Direct corrections and
technical inquiries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bard

Visit me at:
The Center for Exposing Corruption in the Federal Government
http://www.xld.com/public/center/center.htm

Federal Government defined:
....a benefit/subsidy protection racket!

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to