8.2.99 Recipients-- Certain inherent contradictions and some definite "whoppers" in the alleged FBI preliminary report regarding the deaths of John Kennedy, Jr., his wife Carolyn and sister-in-law Lauren Bessette, have been bugging us. My feeling about this document is that, in classic spook fashion, it cleverly mixes in elements of the truth (i.e.; the plane WAS intentionally destroyed by some means, which most likely resulted in an explosive event of some intensity) with some highly questionable data that, naturally, will serve to discredit the entire document AND any elements of truth it may contain. Furthermore this will serve the purpose of derailing further serious inquiry into the tragedy AND of discrediting ALL accounts of events which indicate "foul play" or intentional, targeted destruction of the aircraft by hostile agencies. One of the most notable of these HIGHLY questionable statements in this "FBI" report is that Carolyn Kennedy was in her third trimester of pregnancy. Earlier rumors right after the plane went missing were that Carolyn was pregnant--no claims that she was in her third trimester. To think that someone in their third trimester of pregnancy would be able to prevent just about anyone with reasonably functional eyes from noticing the truly hard-to-conceal outward physical manifestations of this condition is hopelessly absurd. That statement right there makes this entire document highly questionable. Neither the leaked "interpol" report on the air disaster NOR the internal FAA document that was held, seen and read by our contact in the New York area make the kind of definitive statements about the destruction of this airplane found in this "FBI" report, though both indicate SOME kind of hostile targeting of the craft MOMENTS AFTER Kennedy completed his 9:39 radio contact with the Vineyard airport. The FAA document CLEARLY indicates a massive electromagnetic pulse was the cause of the crash of this exceptionally reliable airplane (this plane in fact has electronic sensing equipment which can literally right the plane if the pilot is losing control [up to a point of course]): utterly fusing and melting every single integrated circuit on the plane, including all hi-tech devices such as the auto-stabilizer system just noted, exploding every light bulb in the aircraft, totally discharging the plane's battery/charging system, and certainly blinding and probably microwaving all passengers. The chances of such an event causing a secondary explosion due to sparks from fused sensing equipment in the fuel system are extremely high The fact that the wheels/landing gear apparatus was found detached from the main body of the plane tends o support this assessment. Reason? the Piper Saratoga has retractable landing gear. The wheels would have almost certainly still have been retracted and therefore would NOT have broken off when the plane hit the after. that the craft was blown apart before it hit the water. People I know personally and trust have seen the FAA document first-hand. They believe it to be genuine. The credibility of the sender of the "interpol" report has been assiduously investigated. I and others believe the sender to be in fact "who he says he is" and thus feel the report he sent us is fundamentally valid. For my money, toss the alleged FBI report. Investigators should concentrate on what is stated and implied in the other two reports noted. The FAA document in fact should immediately become the subject of a Freedom of Information Act filing for full public disclosure of the contents of the document. Oh... and what about the NTSB report? Toilet paper. John Quinn/NewsHawk Inc.
