-Caveat Lector-
This is not proof read - I do a good job in just
getting some things posted. Will redo this for the
web site, though most of the basic ideas are already
on my web site
------------------------------------------------.
Japan backing Aspartame and Monsanto
needs to stop. But to think that they are the
majority? Not with the way they are using
antibiotic soap and poisoning their area too.
They need to do a through study
of the managial system but they need to start
studying history with Charlegmegne.
-- Now to go on to the rest of my thread --
With the potential of intananious transportation
one central food point - saying that food has to be
irradiated, so that people do not realize that humans
could be transported (maybe even a brain being
"exchanged" on the move) -- anyway
a food monopoly - with food and supplies being
delivered to you house. They will know all additives
so that they can keep track of how human "lab rats"
react to the chemicals. The best "lab rats" would be
blond, blue eyed ones (like in Ice Land or the Aryans)
that do not have all those extra (pesky) genes to worry
about.
1960' TV slowed it
satellite TV slowed things
the Internet stands in the way
Over seas things have happened like
infants developing breasts. Dioxins are
having to be fazed out! It takes three years to
be certified organic, yet there are already some
farms that are. When the full dioxin / hormone
-- dioxin and other chemicals - like herbicides, pesticides,
chlorine, and fluoride that we get from plants and animals.
thing lands on us, farmers will have no warning
since the EPA will not be allowed to post these
farms or their products as polluters, so they will
lose their farms. Even if they do go organic, have
you noticed how many smaller grocery stores are
going under? Where will the farmers sell their produce?
someone is looking at the potential of putting matter transmission
online but before they do that they are putting in irradiation and
using antibiotics, and hormones with animals and
pesticides, herbicides in food to kill the good
bacteria so that e-coli can flourish. Getting the
meat packing plants, who owns the banks that
are foreclosing on the farm land?
Why now? Space travel and the fact that soon education
will be a in-fad and lame brains will get shown up for
what they are, so the lame brains are going for the monopolies now!
Also they are thinking what would someone
do if they were sued for a persons potential earnings
if that person would have lived 1, 2, or 3 hundred years -
Now you know why Zero population growth and why
children are surplus. There are some definite reasons
why those lame brains should not do their monopoly!
When NASA needs people that have multiple degrees people
should not be weeded out in the lower grades. Where would we
be in space travel if solar had really been allowed to take off. Also
when many of the aging population could be the ones to help get
space habitat going, what could be another reason why this is
happening? Because they need to thin out some of their
mistakes - and if they can own the world while they are at
it, they think so much the better. Life is diversity, and
they advocate getting rid of many of the different ethics.
We need the diversity and to study how different areas
have adapted to their bacteria.
*Nazi white lab rats called Aryans could realize that nutrition is
the main reason for IQ -not- genetics.
*That many people
would not have the time for "hate crimes".
*That you can give people back their history
- no matter how blood thirsty without a continuance
of old feuds since - it seems as if bacteria is the main
reason for the feuds.
** consider: Bacteria is male and female in one organism.
They spar with their male organs, The one that gets speared
is the one that has to use it's resources to replicate.
-- high survival index? !!
Bacteria is a part of every organism from plants to animals and humans.
Humans have bacteria in their stomachs that help them
digest food and if that bacteria were not there you would
die. Animals have to be more interesting than plants from a bacterial
point of view,
1) but plants can live longer
2) do not need animals to survive
we need plants to survive
3) can live anywhere in the world
which life form would bacteria protect?
Any time a major center of civilization has
been put together, compiled or collected it has
been destroyed. WHY? Because they started
bogarting their fertilizer....
Majority rules - and humans are not the majority,
also since we seem to be nothing more than
walking fertilizer units - does it matter if we are
educated or not? With the amount of interesting
bacteria coming in from outer space it seems as
if that basic survival index would want to try to
go to the source - but not at the risk of being
killed here. By my thinking this would
mean that many of the Europeans that came to
the New World (America) *New World Order*
Were homicidal maniacs with suicidal tendencies.
Ants and other things will take our place with plants.
BUT
If a whole plant can move to follow the light
Then is there some kind of empathic communication?
Plant (s) bacteria helps those that help themselves?
This empathic connection would continue under ground
and in space, potential of a brain being rewired?
So do you want people in control to be homicidal,
lowly educated? Just because they have money
does that mean that they have the control of themselves
that would be needed to choose who to put over our heads
in space?
If survival for bacteria is survival of bad bacteria
(in humans) then things would be done that
would kill off the beneficial bacteria that keeps us
alive. Things like stress - such as rape, Satanic
rituals, and other things that would give these people
that kind of control, since they would get to the point that they
would eventually get rid of humans all together.
or make it such that another type of bacteria is in
the majority.
wonder what kind of intelligence could
be in the sun, in nuclear? Could worlds like ours be
the beginning of black holes? Could bipeds be
the hands that old entities (solar/hydrogen) need
for experiments? Could humans that get a working
relationship with their symbiant bacteria be hundreds or
thousands of years ahead of us?
For them that would have "World Control"
Even if they could make those that go into
space all female so that the ones that are in
space are tied to Earth control, how hard would
it be for someone to take human DNA and set things
right? Those in space would have to be able to
clear up their DNA because of the potential that
bacteria would change it.
Consider
Space travel has to be a closed ecological system
so would pharmisudical companies have control?
Pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics, or hormones in a
closed system? With what they are giving the bacteria
to fight with, ---
But they figure that they can go underground or in space if needed,
but with that empathic connection - even if they use no food, water
or other items from Earth - will they eventually get re-wired for
a short life span and then death from just contacting Earth?
Energy would have to be from a renewable source for
space travel.
Solar? Magnetic?
Some of this is attempting to get religion and American
senator a bad name - why?
so that someone might take out the History.
Consider the library of Congress and the
history at the Vatican.
Also if Blair gets the plan through to get rid of the
Lords and then the royal house, many areas will
be as if they were ruled by the Impailer. Kings and
Queens are living history, during a time that some do
not want history or education at all.
Bottom line - they need healthy humans that are not
biohazards to have the bacteria give us a majority
again. OR
The Human race will be a dead as the dinosaur.
Alamaine Ratliff wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> >From www.publicampaign.org/ouch.html#chemical
>
> > OUCH! #29 -- August 18, 1999
> >
> >
> > Chemical Industry Keeps You in the Dark
> >
> > IGNORANCE IS BLISS
> >
> > In 1990, after the Bhopal chemical plant disaster in India,
> > Congress moved to help prevent similar accidents at facilities
> > using extremely hazardous substances. Thousands of facilities
> > that use certain flammable and toxic chemicals were required,
> > under the Clean Air Act, to submit risk management plans to the
> > Environmental Protection Agency and state and local governments.
> > The deadline: June 21, 1999.
> >
> > The core idea was that the public has a right to know about the
> > chemical hazards in their communities, and that local emergency
> > response personnel need advance information to prepare for and
> > prevent possible chemical accidents. In addition, by allowing
> > researchers to collect and compare information about accident
> > risks at existing facilities, safety advocates could set
> > priorities for hazard reduction and determine which companies
> > were taking necessary precautions and which companies were
> > needlessly endangering their neighbors.
> >
> > All that prudent legislation has gone out the window with the
> > passage of the Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and
> > Fuels Regulatory Relief Act (S. 880). Signed into law by
> > President Clinton in early August, the new law blocks the EPA
> > from posting on the Internet any information about a facility's
> > "offsite-consequence analysis" (that's bureaucrateze for
> > information describing how dangerous a facility currently
> > is)--including worst-case scenarios involving toxic releases or
> > explosions. Only "qualified researchers" may request access to
> > that information, but they are explicitly prohibited from
> > disseminating it in any form, under pain of criminal fines. The
> > only thing companies have to do to demonstrate that they are
> > taking any precautionary action is hold a meeting with local
> > stakeholders sometime in the next six months, summarizing the
> > issues around any worst-case scenario involving a local facility.
> >
> >
> > So much for the public's right-to-know. This approach can be
> > summarized as follows: if there is a danger of a chemical
> > accident, the best solution is to keep the public in the dark as
> > to how bad the risks are and what, if anything, is being done
> > about it.
> >
> > This is a classic case of how moneyed interests, focused hard on
> > a narrow concern, can easily defeat the broader interest when the
> > public isn't paying attention. The chemical industry led the
> > charge for S. 880, its influence rooted in $4 million in PAC
> > donations, soft money and large individual ($200 and up)
> > contributions to congressional candidates in 1997-98. Its allies
> > in the food processing industry, oil and gas producers and
> > refiners, and agricultural fertilizer sectors--all of which are
> > also subject to the Clean Air Act--gave another $22.5 million.
> > Three-quarters of that went to Republicans. The leading sponsors
> > of S. 880 were Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), who raised $432,730
> > from those industries between 1993 and 1998, and Rep. Tom Bliley
> > (R-VA), recipient of $93,261. Against them were a host of
> > consumer and environmental groups, none of them major campaign
> > contributors.
> >
> > The chemical industry claims that S. 880 was needed to prevent
> > dangerous information from falling into the hands of terrorists,
> > giving them a road map of which plants to attack. Never mind that
> > the EPA had specifically exempted any classified information from
> > being released in facility risk management plans. And forget that
> > from 1987 to 1996, there have been 600,000 accidents reported
> > involving hazardous chemicals--and not one has been caused by
> > terrorists. As it is, S. 880 contains no provisions to improve
> > site security, reduce hazards through inherent safety, or harden
> > facilities against attack.
> >
> > Two-hundred-fifty people, plant-workers as well as people living
> > nearby, die each year from chemical accidents. The more the
> > public knows about those risks, the more the pressure that proper
> > precautions be taken. Which is apparently the last thing the
> > chemical industry wants.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > OUCH! is a regular e-mail bulletin on how private money in
> > politics hurts average citizens, published by Public Campaign, a
> > non-partisan, non-profit organization devoted to comprehensive
> > campaign finance reform. Every day, we pay more as consumers and
> > taxpayers for special interest subsidies and boondoggles because
> > of our system of privately financed elections. It's time for a
> > change.
> >
> > Help spread the word! Send copies of this message to your friends
> > and join the growing movement for real campaign finance reform.
> > If you would like to add yourself to the OUCH! listserv, send a
> > one-line e-mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] reading "subscribe
> > ouch". To remove yourself from the list, send a message to the
> > same address reading "unsubscribe ouch".
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------- [back to OUCH!]
>
> PubliCampaign.Org
> www.publicampaign.org/index.html
>
> > If you're looking for real solutions to clean up the campaign
> > finance mess in this country, you've come to the right place. We
> > can show you what's wrong with the system and how you can help
> > fix it. That's right: YOU CAN HELP FIX IT. In fact, if America is
> > ever going to change the money culture that defines politics
> > today, WE THE PEOPLE are going to have to do it ourselves. We
> > must put pressure on Congress and our state legislatures. Public
> > pressure still sways politicians, in Washington and in state
> > capitols. Real reform will only come from the ground up. Join
> > Public Campaign and work for Clean Money Campaign Reform.
>
> A<>E<>R
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
> new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
> "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
> it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
> own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
> A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
> one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
> German Writer (1759-1805)
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
> It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
> prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
> "Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
> information and ideas through any media and regardless
> of frontiers."
> Universal Declaration of Human Rights
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
> "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
> teach you to keep your mouth shut."
> --- Ernest Hemingway
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
> Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
> In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
> is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
> expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
> for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
--------------------
Any person can stand adversity,
The true test is to give a person power.
http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/ThePiedPiper/~index.htm
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
