Is it veelveta or cointelpro? Inquiring minds wander . . . Fight!fight!fight! Author!author!author! The TRUTH comes from us all. Large is the house and strong is the table and all ofr us have something to bring. MHO. Times are emotional, but time don't care. Histronics breeds . . . Be very careful of what you believe, step away from the whip saw. For the culture is leaving "their" conspiratorial framework, The natives are becoming educated. More than "their" hand is showing. The fat underbelly of prohibition and "national security" drug trafficking for economic, political and social control. The stench of the corruption reeks through the corridors of the "their" malappropiated system of oppression. Karma is as karma does. Om K
10.6.99 McNulty--2nd Level of Gov't Disinfo on Waco (c) 1999 NewsHawk Inc. Rights of unaltered reproduction/distribution hereby waived Sources which NewsHawk considers exceptionally reliable have for some time now been dropping us hints--as well as some outright unqualified statements--that filmmaker Michael McNulty, who produced "Waco: The Rules of Engagement" in addition to that film's current successor, is in fact a government disinformation agent. The claims are that McNulty and company, through the dissemination of these films, are propagating the second stage or "firewall" of government disinformation about the monstrosity unleashed by federal law enforcement and military forces at Mt. Carmel. We have held off on publicizing these claims for some time, until we could get a better handle on the situation and further verification of these charges. Well, the time for putting these charges forth has come. For the most comprehensive presentation of this body of information we refer NewsHawk readers to Carol Valentine's excellent analysis of McNulty's efforts entitled "Waco Documentary Is A HOAX!", which is posted at the following website -- http://www.mnsinc.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum/burial/doc/wre_rev1.html Ms. Valentine wrote the article TWO YEARS AGO--long before the current re-stoking of the Waco fires by the loads of news evidence released in the past 2 months. What's basically going on is that McNulty is promulgating, by means of his films, a second level of disinformation regarding the government's INTENTIONAL MASS MURDER at Waco. He has implemented the following scenario/cover story for the government which purports (naturally) to be the "real story": of course, this spin-doctored version of events is SOMEWHAT "damaging" to the feds… but in a very controlled, contrived and fundamentally FALSE way. McNulty's job is to make the public believe that it was in fact "incompetence", "misunderstanding", miscommunication, "fear" and even "panic" on the part of law enforcement and military personnel at Waco as well as their bosses in Washington D.C. which led to their "over-reaction" (OVER-REACTION??!!) at Waco, resulting in total destruction of the compound and the deaths of over 80 people: and NOT any intentional, concerted, carefully thought-out, PRE-PLANNED operation from the very top on down, aimed at literally and in cold blood MURDERING everyone they possibly could at Mt. Carmel, which an ever-increasing avalanche of testimony and evidence is indeed now showing WAS the case. Several days ago, McNulty spoke in the Denver area about Waco. Our friend in the area, Patty, attended his talk and managed to get a few questions to McNulty. His answers and his attitude speak VOLUMES about these very points we have just raised in this article; and in fact were the deciding factor in us publicizing these charges regarding McNulty and his true agenda regarding Waco. Here's what Patty wrote to us about this, and believe us, it really shows clearly exactly where McNulty is "at" on Waco. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1. When I went to the speaker's event here in Denver, and asked if he had heard about the 3 Delta Force people that had been killed recently in training accidents, he pooh-poohed the whole thing as just another "conspiracy theory". He then asked if I knew any of the names, to which I replied "No, I don't have the information with me but I can forward it to you if you give me your e-mail address." He went on to point out how these rumors get started and that he was very skeptical because the government is not going to make Delta Force names public. He also went on to say that all that was known about these people was that they were stationed at Fort Bragg NC, and that people have made the connection, "Fort Bragg?... Must be Delta Force." It was the second question (not in a row) that I had asked him during his question and answer period. The first was if he had heard whether Koresh had accepted stolen weapons from a National Guard armory heist and, if so, was there any truth to that story. He decried conspiracy theories on that one too. In his speech, before he opened up for questions, he spoke of how Ted Koppel chided him for being (I'm paraphrasing here) hooked up with conspiracy nuts. I must say that the second time he inferred that I was some kind of conspiracy kook, I told him (in so many words) in front of everybody that, like him, I didn't appreciate being lumped in with conspiracy kooks and that I am a questioner and have an inquisitive mind. I also told him that I asked the question in the hopes of finding out if their testimony in the upcoming hearings would have been crucial. He responded by saying that the point (about con. kooks) was well taken, but that conspiracy is what I had inferred. There were several other inconsistencies. My dad went with me. McNulty spoke about how the CS gas just causes disorientation and is not fatal etc. My dad asked him about the rumor that when CS gas catches fire it creates cyanide. **McNulty then DID A 180-DEGREE TURN and said "I started that rumor!" and proceeded to tell us how the chemical reaction works and that it IS FATAL, etc.** After the event was over, several of us stayed to ask a few more questions. My dad and I were standing around and he was talking about how unreliable the internet was for factual information. I responded that the mainstream media was more unreliable and that I read darned near everything and don't believe any of it until I've checked out the source notes or other sources. He replied that people can and should get FOIA reports. (Yeah, like right now I have the time!) He asked me if I had been to Ian Goddard's website, to which I replied yes. He pointed out that Ian gets a lot of his information from Gordon Novell. I said, "Gordon Novell? He goes all the way back to the Kennedy assassination!" (My dad said he did a double take when I said that.) Anyway he said that Novell was considered a sometimes reliable, and sometimes iffy source. I told him that I had always heard that, and that is true of many of these people, you just have to check the sources and have a good "built-in bulls--t" detector. And one last thing about the Goddard site, I told him that Ian had the "shape charge" info on his website (the same info that McNulty was touting in his speech) , was skeptical and took it down, and in view of recent information was being asked to re-post it. But it seems as if it's just kook conspiracy, unless McNulty says it.… …SO, I ran a search last night so that I could find his e-mail address and forward a recent post of yours WITH the NAMES of the THREE DELTA FORCE members. I couldn't find one. Someone needs to forward the e-mail below to him!" Patty - - - - - - - - - - - - Good luck with getting the truth to McNulty, and even more luck getting him to bring it forth. Our position is that Carol Valentine has hit the nail most SQUARELY on the head in terms of her assessment of McNulty and company's agenda in relation to the Waco monstrosity.. My estimation is that McNulty is lying piece of trash. John Quinn/NewsHawk Inc.
