-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a prelude to war!

t has been a LONG time since we have seen constitutionality in our
government--especially in the Clinton Adminstration! Once we had heroes like
Davy Crockett--now we have opportunistic, traitoristic sleezebags like
Clinton. When will America finally stand tall and say "Shove it!"??

Lynell

Saturday December 25 1:41 PM ET
Clinton To Spend $900M on Homeless

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Clinton administration is giving out $900 million to
cities, states and non-profit groups to help some 245,000 homeless people
find their way off the streets and into productive lives.

``Those grants will fund proven, successful programs that help homeless
families, veterans and children and people looking for work,'' President
Clinton said Saturday in his weekly radio address.

The White House's announcement landed squarely in the middle of one of the
nation's most competitive Senate races.

New York City is to receive about $60.5 million of the $900 million,
according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. But city
agencies won't have much say in how it is spent because Housing Secretary
Andrew Cuomo announced this week that HUD would hand out the money itself.

Cuomo said he acted after a federal court ruled that city officials
demonstrated a pattern of antagonism and acted with ``retaliatory intent''
against a non-profit group, costing the organization $2.4 million in federal
funds.

Mayor Rudolph Giuliani said the move was politically motivated and designed
to help his likely Senate opponent, first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The grants Clinton announced today will go to more than 350 states and
communities, and more than 1,000 non-profit groups.

About $750 million will be spent on long-term programs designed to keep
homeless people off the streets by providing drug treatment, job training and
other social services.

The remaining $150 million will go to provide shelter and food on a
short-term basis to the needy.

Also Saturday, in the Republican radio address, Sen. James Jeffords of
Vermont recited a list of GOP initiatives and the party's election-year
agenda focusing on Social Security and education as the Republicans try to
defend a slim congressional majority.

 <A HREF="http://www.conservativeusa.org/NotYours.htm">"Not Yours to Give" by
Davy Crockett</A>
http://www.conservativeusa.org/NotYours.htm

The Conservative Caucus Documents of Freedom Collection
"Not Yours To Give"
by Col. David Crockett
US Representative from Tennesee

Originally published in "The Life of Colonel David Crockett," by Edward
Sylvester Ellis.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
One day in the House of Representatives a bill was taken up appropriating
money for the benefit of a widow of a distinguished naval officer. Several
beautiful speeches had been made in its support. The speaker was just about
to put the question when Crockett arose:

"Mr. Speaker--I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as
much sympathy for the suffering of the living, if there be, as any man in
this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy
for part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of
the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has not the
power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member on this
floor knows it.

We have the right as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we
please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to appropriate
a dollar of the public money. Some eloquent appeals have been made to us upon
the ground that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker, the deceased
lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the day of his
death, and I ever heard that the government was in arrears to him.

"Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot without the
grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We have
not the emblance of authority to appropriate it as charity. Mr. Speaker, I
have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as we please. I
am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill, but I will
give one week's pay to the object, and if every member of Congress will do
the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks."

He took his seat. Nobody replied. The bill was put upon its passage, and,
instead of passing unanimously, as was generally supposed, and as, no doubt,
it would, but for that speech, it received but few votes, and, of course, was
lost.

Later, when asked by a friend why he had opposed the appropriation, Crockett
gave this explanation:

"Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the Capitol
with some members of Congress, when our attention was attracted by a great
light over in Georgetown. It was evidently a large fire. We jumped into a
hack and drove over as fast as we could. In spite of all that could be done,
many houses were burned and many families made houseless, and besides, some
of them had lost all but the clothes they had on. The weather was very cold,
and when I saw so many children suffering, I felt that something ought to be
done for them. The next morning a bill was introduced appropriating $20,000
for their relief. We put aside all other business and rushed it through as
soon as it could be done.

"The next summer, when it began to be time to think about election, I
concluded I would take a scout around among the boys of my district. I had no
opposition there but, as the election was some time off, I did not know what
might turn up. When riding one day in a part of my district in which I was
more of a stranger than any other, I saw a man in a field plowing and coming
toward the road. I gauged my gait so that we should meet as he came up, I
spoke to the man. He replied politely, but as I thought, rather coldly.

"I began: 'Well friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings called
candidates and---

"Yes I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once before, and
voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose you are out
electioneering now, but you had better not waste your time or mine, I shall
not vote for you again."

"This was a sockdolger...I begged him tell me what was the matter.

"Well Colonel, it is hardly worthwhile to waste time or words upon it. I do
not see how it can be mended, but you gave a vote last winter which shows
that either you have not capacity to understand the Constitution, or that you
are wanting in the honesty and firmness to be guided by it. In either case
you are not the man to represent me. But I beg your pardon for expressing it
that way. I did not intend to avail myself of the privilege of the
constituent to speak plainly to a candidate for the purpose of insulting you
or wounding you.'

"I intend by it only to say that your understanding of the constitution is
very different from mine; and I will say to you what but for my rudeness, I
should not have said, that I believe you to be honest.

But an understanding of the constitution different from mine I cannot
overlook, because the Constitution, to be worth anything, must be held
sacred, and rigidly observed in all its provisions. The man who wields power
and misinterprets it is the more dangerous the honest he is.'

" 'I admit the truth of all you say, but there must be some mistake. Though I
live in the backwoods and seldom go from home, I take the papers from
Washington and read very carefully all the proceedings of Congress. My papers
say you voted for a bill to appropriate $20,000 to some sufferers by fire in
Georgetown. Is that true?

"Well my friend; I may as well own up. You have got me there. But certainly
nobody will complain that a great and rich country like ours should give the
insignificant sum of $20,000 to relieve its suffering women and children,
particularly with a full and overflowing treasury, and I am sure, if you had
been there, you would have done just the same as I did.'

"It is not the amount, Colonel, that I complain of; it is the principle. In
the first place, the government ought to have in the Treasury no more than
enough for its legitimate purposes. But that has nothing with the question.
The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most
dangerous power that can be entrusted to man, particularly under our system
of collecting revenue by a tariff, which reaches every man in the country, no
matter how poor he may be, and the poorer he is the more he pays in
proportion to his means.

What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight
centers, for there is not a man in the United States who can ever guess how
much he pays to the government. So you see, that while you are contributing
to relieve one, you are drawing it from thousands who are even worse off than
he.

If you had the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of
discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as
$20,000. If you have the right to give at all; and as the Constitution
neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to give
to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is a
charity and to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily perceive
what a wide door this would open for fraud and corruption and favoritism, on
the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other. 'No, Colonel, Congress
has no right to give charity.'

"'Individual members may give as much of their own money as they please, but
they have no right to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose. If
twice as many houses had been burned in this country as in Georgetown,
neither you nor any other member of Congress would have Thought of
appropriating a dollar for our relief. There are about two hundred and forty
members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy for the sufferers by
contributing each one week's pay, it would have made over $13,000. There are
plenty of wealthy men around Washington who could have given $20,000 without
depriving themselves of even a luxury of life.'

"The congressmen chose to keep their own money, which, if reports be true,
some of them spend not very creditably; and the people about Washington, no
doubt, applauded you for relieving them from necessity of giving what was not
yours to give. The people have delegated to Congress, by the Constitution,
the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized to collect and
pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is usurpation, and a
violation of the Constitution.'

"'So you see, Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what I consider
a vital point. It is a precedent fraught with danger to the country, for when
Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the
Constitution, there is no limit to it, and no security for the people. I have
no doubt you acted honestly, but that does not make it any better, except as
far as you are personally concerned, and you see that I cannot vote for you.'

"I tell you I felt streaked. I saw if I should have opposition, and this man
should go to talking and in that district I was a gone fawn-skin. I could not
answer him, and the fact is, I was so fully convinced that he was right, I
did not want to. But I must satisfy him, and I said to him:

"Well, my friend, you hit the nail upon the head when you said I had not
sense enough to understand the Constitution. I intended to be guided by it,
and thought I had studied it fully. I have heard many speeches in Congress
about the powers of Congress, but what you have said here at your plow has
got more hard, sound sense in it than all the fine speeches I ever heard. If
I had ever taken the view of it that you have, I would have put my head into
the fire before I would have given that vote; and if you will forgive me and
vote for me again, if I ever vote for another unconstitutional law I wish I
may be shot.'

"He laughingly replied; 'Yes, Colonel, you have sworn to that once before,
but I will trust you again upon one condition. You are convinced that your
vote was wrong. Your acknowledgment of it will do more good than beating you
for it. If, as you go around the district, you will tell people about this
vote, and that you are satisfied it was wrong, I will not only vote for you,
but will do what I can to keep down opposition, and perhaps, I may exert some
little influence in that way.'

"If I don't, said I, 'I wish I may be shot; and to convince you that I am in
ernest in what I say I will come back this way in a week or ten days, and if
you will get up a gathering of people, I will make a speech to them. Get up a
barbecue, and I will pay for it.'

"No, Colonel, we are not rich people in this section but we have plenty of
provisions to contribute for a barbecue, and some to spare for those who have
none. The push of crops will be over in a few days, and we can then afford a
day for a barbecue. 'This Thursday; I will see to getting it up on Saturday
week. Come to my house on Friday, and we will go together, and I promise you
a very respectable crowd to see and hear you.

"'Well I will be here. But one thing more before I say good-bye. I must know
your name."

"'My name is Bunce.'

"'Not Horatio Bunce?'

"'Yes

"'Well, Mr. Bunce, I never saw you before, though you say you have seen me,
but I know you very well. I am glad I have met you, and very proud that I may
hope to have you for my friend.'

"It was one of the luckiest hits of my life that I met him. He mingled but
little with the public, but was widely known for his remarkable intelligence,
and for a heart brim-full and running over with kindness and benevolence,
which showed themselves not only in words but in acts. He was the oracle of
the whole country around him, and his fame had extended far beyond the circle
of his immediate acquaintance. Though I had never met him, before, I had
heard much of him, and but for this meeting it is very likely I should have
had opposition, and had been beaten. One thing is very certain, no man could
now stand up in that district under such a vote.

"At the appointed time I was at his house, having told our conversation to
every crowd I had met, and to every man I stayed all night with, and I found
that it gave the people an interest and confidence in me stronger than I had
ever seen manifested before.

"Though I was considerably fatigued when I reached his house, and, under
ordinary circumstances, should have gone early to bed, I kept him up until
midnight talking about the principles and affairs of government, and got more
real, true knowledge of them than I had got all my life before."

"I have known and seen much of him since, for I respect him - no, that is not
the word - I reverence and love him more than any living man, and I go to see
him two or three times every year; and I will tell you, sir, if every one who
professes to be a Christian lived and acted and enjoyed it as he does, the
religion of Christ would take the world by storm.

"But to return to my story. The next morning we went to the barbecue and, to
my surprise, found about a thousand men there. I met a good many whom I had
not known before, and they and my friend introduced me around until I had got
pretty well acquainted - at least, they all knew me.

"In due time notice was given that I would speak to them. They gathered up
around a stand that had been erected. I opened my speech by saying:

"Fellow-citizens - I present myself before you today feeling like a new man.
My eyes have lately been opened to truths which ignorance or prejudice or
both, had heretofore hidden from my view. I feel that I can today offer you
the ability to render you more valuable service than I have ever been able to
render before. I am here today more for the purpose of acknowledging my error
than to seek your votes. That I should make this acknowledgment is due to
myself as well as to you. Whether you will vote for me is a matter for your
consideration only."

"I went on to tell them about the fire and my vote for the appropriation and
then told them why I was satisfied it was wrong. I closed by saying:

"And now, fellow-citizens, it remains only for me to tell you that the most
of the speech you have listened to with so much interest was simply a
repetition of the arguments by which your neighbor, Mr. Bunce, convinced me
of my error.

"It is the best speech I ever made in my life, but he is entitled to the
credit for it. And now I hope he is satisfied with his convert and that he
will get up here and tell you so.'

"He came up to the stand and said:

"Fellow-citizens - it affords me great pleasure to comply with the request of
Colonel Crockett. I have always considered him a thoroughly honest man, and I
am satisfied that he will faithfully perform all that he has promised you
today.'

"He went down, and there went up from that crowd such a shout for Davy
Crockett as his name never called forth before.'

"I am not much given to tears, but I was taken with a choking then and felt
some big drops rolling down my cheeks. And I tell you now that the
remembrance of those few words spoken by such a man, and the honest, hearty
shout they produced, is worth more to me than all the honors I have received
and all the reputation I have ever made, or ever shall make, as a member of
Congress.'

"Now, sir," concluded Crockett, "you know why I made that speech yesterday.
"There is one thing which I will call your attention, "you remember that I
proposed to give a week's pay. There are in that House many very wealthy men
- men who think nothing of spending a week's pay, or a dozen of them, for a
dinner or a wine party when they have something to accomplish by it. Some of
those same men made beautiful speeches upon the great debt of gratitude which
the country owed the deceased--a debt which could not be paid by money--and
the insignificance and worthlessness of money, particularly so insignificant
a sum as $20,000 when weighed against the honor of the nation. Yet not one of
them responded to my proposition. Money with them is nothing but trash when
it is to come out of the people. But it is the one great thing for which most
of them are striving, and many of them sacrifice honor, integrity, and
justice to obtain it."




**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to