http://ThePiedPiper.tripod.com/choldchm.htm#fluoride
this page may be of intrest.
It was one of my first pages using NotePad
and it shows.
Here is the main site index if intrested.
http://ThePiedPiper.tripod.com/site_map.htm

Another page that may be of intrest is
http://ThePiedPiper.tripod.com/in_dex.htm
go a third of the way down
then
slowly continue till you find the word
Activist in bold and <H1> size
then these links are there if you are just
intrested in the links Farm Bureau vs. Nature [1] by Vicki Monks Fall
1998
http://www.defenders.org/fbp01.html
Farm Bureau vs. Nature [2] by Vicki Monks Fall 1998
http://www.defenders.org/fbp02.html
*Texas Department of Agriculture http://www.agr.state.tx.us/*
*Farm Bureau vs. Nature [3] by Vicki Monks Fall 1998
http://www.defenders.org/fbp03.html

this page of Bush links could be intresting as well
http://ThePiedPiper.tripod.com/index.htm




Steve Wingate wrote:
>
> ------- Forwarded message follows -------
> Date sent:              Thu, 13 Apr 2000 05:07:00 -0700
> From:                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:                SNET: FLUORIDE - "It's For The Children" (Where have we 
>heard that
>         before?)
> To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ->  SNETNEWS  Mailing List
>
> PART I
> Fluoride, Teeth, &
> The Atomic Bomb
> 4-12-00
>
> The following article exposes the biggest on-going medical experiment ever
> carried out by the United States Government on an unsuspecting population.
>
> Although commissioned by the Christian Science Monitor in early Spring of
> 1997, it has not yet been published. Readers are invited to inquire when
> publication can be expected, by calling the Christian Science Monitor at
> 1-800-288-7090. . . . . . surely the Federal Government would not have
> "discouraged" the CSM from publishing such damaging information, information
> vital to the health and safety of millions of
> municipal-fluoridated-water-drinking sheeple........naw, don't even think
> that.
>
> Fluoride, Teeth, and the Atomic Bomb
>
> By Joel Griffiths and Chris Bryson © July 1997
>
> Some fifty years after the United States began adding fluoride to public
> water supplies to reduce cavities in children's teeth, declassified
> government documents are shedding new light on the roots of that still
> controversial public health measure, revealing a surprising connection
> between fluoride and the dawning of the nuclear age.
>
> Today, two thirds of U.S. public drinking water is fluoridated. Many
> municipalities still resist the practice, disbelieving the government's
> assurances of safety .
>
> Since the days of World War II, when this nation prevailed by building the
> world's first atomic bomb, U.S. public health leaders have maintained that
> low doses of fluoride are safe for people, and good for children's teeth.
>
> That safety verdict should now be re-examined in the light of hundreds of
> once-secret World War II documents obtained by Griffiths and Bryson -
> including declassified papers of the Manhattan Project, the U.S. military
> group that built the atomic bomb.
>
> Fluoride was the key chemical in atomic bomb production, according to the
> documents. Massive quantities of fluoride - millions of tons - were essential
> for the manufacture of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons
> throughout the Cold War. One of the most toxic chemicals known, fluoride
> rapidly emerged as the leading chemical health hazard of the U.S. atomic bomb
> program - both for workers and for nearby communities, the documents reveal.
>
> Other revelations include:
>
> Much of the original proof that fluoride is safe for humans in low doses was
> generated by A-bomb program scientists, who had been secretly ordered to
> provide "evidence useful in litigation" against defense contractors for
> fluoride injury to citizens. The first lawsuits against the U.S. A-bomb
> program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage, the documents
> show.
>
> Human studies were required. Bomb program researchers played a leading role
> in the design and implementation of the most extensive U.S. study of the
> health effects of fluoridating public drinking water - conducted in Newburgh,
> New York from 1945 to 1956. Then, in a classified operation code-named
> "Program F," they secretly gathered and analysed blood and tissue samples
> from Newburgh citizens, with the cooperation of State Health Department
> personnel.
>
> The original secret version - obtained by these reporters - of a 1948 study
> published by Program F scientists in the Journal of the American Dental
> Association shows that evidence of adverse health effects from fluoride was
> censored by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) - considered the most
> powerful of Cold War agencies - for reasons of national security.
>
> The bomb program's fluoride safety studies were conducted at the University
> of Rochester, site of one of the most notorious human radiation experiments
> of the Cold War, in which unsuspecting hospital patients were injected with
> toxic doses of radioactive plutonium. The fluoride studies were conducted
> with the same ethical mind-set, in which "national security" was paramount.
>
> The U.S. government's conflict of interest - and its motive to prove fluoride
> "safe" - has not until now been made clear to the general public in the
> furious debate over water fluoridation since the 1950's, nor to civilian
> researchers and health professionals, or journalists.
>
> The declassified documents resonate with a growing body of scientific
> evidence, and a chorus of questions, about the health effects of fluoride in
> the environment.
>
> Human exposure to fluoride has mushroomed since World War II, due not only to
> fluoridated water and toothpaste, but to environmental pollution by major
> industries from aluminum to pesticides: Fluoride is a critical industrial
> chemical.
>
> The impact can be seen, literally, in the smiles of our children. Large
> numbers of U.S. young people - up to 80 percent in some cities - now have
> dental fluorosis, the first visible sign of excessive fluoride exposure,
> according to the U.S. National Research Council. (The signs are whitish
> flecks or spots, particularly on the front teeth, or dark spots or stripes in
> more severe cases.)
>
> Less-known to the public is that fluoride also accumulates in bones - "The
> teeth are windows to what's happening in the bones," explains Paul Connett,
> Professor of Chemistry at St. Lawrence (N.Y.) University. In recent years,
> pediatric bone specialists have expressed alarm about an increase in stress
> fractures among U.S. young people. Connett and other scientists are concerned
> that fluoride - linked to bone damage by studies since the 1930's - may be a
> contributing factor. The declassified documents add urgency: Much of the
> original proof that low-dose fluoride is safe for children's bones came from
> U.S. bomb program scientists, according to this investigation.
>
> Now, researchers who have reviewed these declassified documents fear that
> Cold War national security considerations may have prevented objective
> scientific evaluation of vital public health questions concerning fluoride.
>
> Information was buried," concludes Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, former head of
> toxicology at Forsyth Dental Center in Boston, and now a critic of
> fluoridation. Animal studies Mullenix and co-workers conducted at Forsyth in
> the early 1990's indicated that fluoride was a powerful central nervous
> system (CNS) toxin, and might adversely affect human brain functioning, even
> at low doses. (New epidemiological evidence from China adds support, showing
> a correlation between low-dose fluoride exposure and diminished I.Q. in
> children.) Mullenix's results were published in 1995, in a reputable
> peer-reviewed scientific journal.
>
> During her investigation, Mullenix was astonished to discover there had been
> virtually no previous U.S. studies of fluoride's effects on the human brain.
> Then, her application for a grant to continue her CNS research was turned
> down by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), where an NIH panel, she
> says, flatly told her that "fluoride does not have central nervous system
> effects."
>
> Declassified documents of the U.S. atomic-bomb program indicate otherwise. An
> April 29, 1944 Manhattan Project memo reports: "Clinical evidence suggests
> that uranium hexafluoride may have a rather marked central nervous system
> effect.... It seems most likely that the F [code for fluoride] component
> rather than the T [code for uranium] is the causative factor."
>
> The memo - stamped "secret" - is addressed to the head of the Manhattan
> Project's Medical Section, Col. Stafford Warren. Colonel Warren is asked to
> approve a program of animal research on CNS effects: "Since work with these
> compounds is essential, it will be necessary to know in advance what mental
> effects may occur after exposure... This is important not only to protect a
> given individual, but also to prevent a confused workman from injuring others
> by improperly performing his duties."
>
> On the same day, Colonel Warren approved the CNS research program. This was
> in 1944, at the height of the Second World War and the nation's race to build
> the world's first atomic bomb. For research on fluoride's CNS effects to be
> approved at such a momentous time, the supporting evidence set forth in the
> proposal forwarded along with the memo must have been persuasive.
>
> The proposal, however, is missing from the files of the U.S. National
> Archives. "If you find the memos, but the document they refer to is missing,
> it's probably still classified," said Charles Reeves, chief librarian at the
> Atlanta branch of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration,
> where the memos were found. Similarly, no results of the Manhattan Project's
> fluoride CNS research could be found in the files.
>
> After reviewing the memos, Mullenix declared herself "flabbergasted." She
> went on, "How could I be told by NIH that fluoride has no central nervous
> system effects when these documents were sitting there all the time?" She
> reasons that the Manhattan Project did do fluoride CNS studies - "that kind
> of warning, that fluoride workers might be a danger to the bomb program by
> improperly performing their duties - I can't imagine that would be ignored" -
> but that the results were buried because they might create a difficult legal
> and public relations problem for the government.
>
> The author of the 1944 CNS research proposal was Dr. Harold C. Hodge, at the
> time chief of fluoride toxicology studies for the University of Rochester
> division of the Manhattan Project. Nearly fifty years later at the Forsyth
> Dental Center in Boston, Dr. Mullenix was introduced to a gently ambling
> elderly man brought in to serve as a consultant on her CNS research - Harold
> C. Hodge. By then Hodge had achieved status emeritus as a world authority on
> fluoride safety.
>
> "But even though he was supposed to be helping me," says Mullenix, "he never
> once mentioned the CNS work he had done for the Manhattan Project."
>
> The "black hole" in fluoride CNS research since the days of the Manhattan
> Project is unacceptable to Mullenix, who refuses to abandon the issue. "There
> is so much fluoride exposure now, and we simply do not know what it is
> doing," she says. "You can't just walk away from this."
>
> Dr. Antonio Noronha, an NIH scientific review advisor familiar with Dr.
> Mullenix's grant request, says her proposal was rejected by a scientific
> peer-review group. He terms her claim of institutional bias against fluoride
> CNS research "farfetched." He adds, "We strive very hard at NIH to make sure
> politics does not enter the picture."
>
> Fluoride and National Security
>
> The documentary trail begins at the height of World War II, in 1944, when a
> severe pollution incident occurred downwind of the E.I. du Pont de Nemours
> Company chemical factory in Deepwater, New Jersey. The factory was then
> producing millions of pounds of fluoride for the Manhattan Project, the
> ultra-secret U.S. military program racing to produce the world's first atomic
> bomb.
>
> The farms downwind in Gloucester and Salem counties were famous for their
> high-quality produce - their peaches went directly to the Waldorf Astoria
> Hotel in New York. Their tomatoes were bought up by Campbell's Soup. But in
> the summer of 1943, the farmers began to report that their crops were
> blighted, and that "something is burning up the peach crops around here."
>
> Poultry died after an all-night thunderstorm, they reported. Farm workers who
> ate the produce they had picked sometimes vomited all night and into the next
> day. "I remember our horses looked sick and were too stiff to work," these
> reporters were told by Mildred Giordano, who was a teenager at the time. Some
> cows were so crippled they could not stand up, and grazed by crawling on
> their bellies.
>
> The account was confirmed in taped interviews, shortly before he died, with
> Philip Sadtler of Sadtler Laboratories of Philadelphia, one of the nation's
> oldest chemical consulting firms. Sadtler had personally conducted the
> initial investigation of the damage.
>
> Although the farmers did not know it, the attention of the Manhattan Project
> and the federal government was riveted on the New Jersey incident, according
> to once-secret documents obtained by these reporters. After the war's end, in
> a secret Manhattan Project memo dated March 1, 1946, the Project's chief of
> fluoride toxicology studies, Harold C. Hodge, worriedly wrote to his boss,
> Colonel Stafford L. Warren, Chief of the Medical Division, about "problems
> associated with the question of fluoride contamination of the atmosphere in a
> certain section of New Jersey. There seem to be four distinct (though
> related) problems," continued Hodge:
>
> -> To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Start an Email List For Free at Topica.  http://www.topica.com/register
> ------- End of forwarded message -------
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Wingate
>
> California Director
> SKYWATCH INTERNATIONAL
>
> Anomalous Images and UFO Files
> http://www.anomalous-images.com
>
> <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
> screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are sordid
> matters
> and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
> <A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>  <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to