Note:  5-gallon polycarbonate water bottles contain 'bisphenol A'.
_____________________________________________________________________

See also:
Raloff, J. 1997. Dental sealant safety reconsidered. Science News 152
(Nov. 22):324.  http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arc97/11_22_97/fob1.htm
_____________________________________________________________________

Note:  Many types of white composite (plastic) fillings are leaking
       synthetic- estrogen into the saliva, around the clock.  A few
       dental composites said to NOT contain 'bisphenol A' are:

1) Procera

2) Diamond Lite and Diamond Crown

3) Targis Vectris --
   Fiber- reinforced poly-ceramic crowns and bridges:
   http://www.dentalceramicsinc.com/Dental_Ceramics_Targis_Vectris.htm

4) Sculpture FibreKor --
   Fiber- reinforced poly-ceramic crowns and bridges:
   http://www.killiandental.com/sculptur.htm


_____________________________________________________________________

     Two articles follow :

       BISPHENOL A CONTRIBUTES TO WEIGHT GAIN, EARLY PUBERTY

       WHAT'S COMING OUT OF BABY'S BOTTLE ?

_____________________________________________________________________


http://www.tmc.tulane.edu/ecme/eehome/newsviews/research/bpa2_00.html


 BISPHENOL A CONTRIBUTES TO WEIGHT GAIN, EARLY PUBERTY

     Posted February 22, 2000
     Review by Kembra L. Howdeshell

 Research paper:

 EXPOSURE TO BISPHENOL A  ADVANCES PUBERTY.

 Howdeshell, Kembra L., Andrew K. Hotchkiss, Kristina A.
 Thayer, John G. Vandenbergh, and Frederick S. vom Saal.
 NATURE, 401(Oct 21, 1999):763-764.

      Article summary by Kembra L. Howdeshell,
      University of Missouri, Columbia.

 Over the past decades, researchers have reported a
 dramatic increase in the number of overweight Americans
 and a decrease in the age at which young girls reach
 puberty. These findings have been attributed to
 nutrition, lifestyle, and genetics. However, a team of
 researchers at the University of Missouri-Columbia and
 North Carolina State University reported in the October
 21, 1999, issue of Nature that an estrogen-mimicking
 chemical used in the manufacture of certain plastic
 products could be a contributing factor.

 Kembra Howdeshell, a University of Missouri doctoral
 candidate, and Frederick vom Saal, biology professor at
 the University of Missouri, exposed mice to a level of
 bisphenol A comparable to human exposure. Bisphenol A,
 an estrogen-mimicking chemical, is a building block for
 the production of polycarbonate plastic products, such
 as baby bottles, the resin lining of food cans, and
 certain types of food storage containers. Bisphenol A
 exposure occurs because the chemical is known to leach
 from such products.

 Pregnant mice were fed a low level of bisphenol A (2.4
 micrograms per kilogram or 2.4 parts per billion)during
 days 11-17 of their 19-day pregnancy, thus exposing the
 developing pups in the womb. Female mice born to
 bisphenol A-treated mothers had an earlier onset of
 puberty and were up to 20% heavier than those born to
 oil-fed control mothers. However, the female offspring
 with highest levels of natural estrogen were much more
 sensitive to the chemical and showed the largest weight
 gain and earliest puberty relative to those females with
 low levels of natural estrogen.

 Specifically, the bisphenol A-exposed females with
 highest natural estrogen levels reached puberty 5 days
 earlier and were 20% heavier at weaning (22-days -old)
 than their untreated counterparts. (while) Female
 offspring with the lowest levels of natural estrogen did
 not show a difference from controls based on their
 exposure to bisphenol A.

 Such variation in natural estrogen levels also exists in
 the human population and could be influencing the
 sensitivity of humans to such chemicals during sensitive
 periods of development in the womb. It is difficult to
 assess the levels of estrogen-mimicking chemicals to
 which humans are exposed and their impact on
 reproductive physiology. However, it is interesting to
 note that an increase in the number of hormone-sensitive
 reproductive abnormalities has occurred concurrent with
 the widespread use of hormone-disruptive agents in the
 environment, thus suggesting an association.

 These research findings do not directly answer questions
 concerning effects in humans; instead the findings pose
 a question regarding human health and may serve as a
 guide for human research. The researchers state that
 bisphenol A should be considered as a factor
 contributing to the changes in growth, sexual
 maturation, and reproductive abnormalities that have
 been reported in the humans in the past decades.


 References/Further reading:

  1. Nagel, S.C., F.S. vom Saal, K.A. Thayer, M.G. Dhar,
     M. Boechler, and W.V. Welshons. 1997. Relative
     binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA)
     assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of
     the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol.
     Environmental Health Perspectives, 105:70-76.

  2. Ben-Jonathan, N. and R. Steinmetz. 1998.
     Xenoestrogens: the emerging story of bisphenol A.
     Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 9:124-128.

  3. vom Saal, F.S., P.S. Cooke, D.L. Buchanan, P.
     Palanza, K.A. Thayer, S.C. Nagel, S. Parmigiani, and
     W.V. Welshons. 1998. A physiologically based
     approach to the study of bisphenol A and other
     estrogenic chemicals on the size of reproductive
     organs daily sperm production and behavior.
     Toxicology and Industrial Health, 14:239-260.

  4. Takao, Y., H.C. Lee, Y. Ishibashi, S. Kohra, N.
     Tominaga, and K. Arizono. 1999. Fast screening
     method for bisphenol A in environmental water and in
     food by solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Journal
     of Health Science, 45:39.


 Last page update: Wednesday, February 23, 2000

 Copyright (c) 1996-2000 Center for Bioenvironmental Research
 at Tulane and Xavier Universities


_____________________________________________________________________


http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arc99/7_24_99/food.htm


                        SCIENCE NEWS ONLINE
                The Weekly Newsmagazine of Science
 July 24, 1999                                      Vol. 156, No. 4


                WHAT'S COMING OUT OF BABY'S BOTTLE ?


 Parents become rightly upset when they read news accounts of
 federal inspectors finding insect bits, pesticides, and other
 contaminants lacing foods that their children will eat. A new
 Japanese study now suggests that the plastic tableware and
 containers from which we often serve foods may contribute
 adulterants of their own -- hormone-mimicking building blocks
 of a plastic.

 Roughly 95 percent of all baby bottles currently on the market are
 made of polycarbonate. As the poly in polycarbonate implies, this
 plastic is a polymer -- a chainlike molecule constructed by linking
 up individual units of a common chemical. In this case, each link
 is a molecule of bisphenol A.

 Toxicologist Koji Arizono of the Prefectural University of
 Kumamoto, Japan, and his colleagues tested 10 different brands of
 polycarbonate baby bottles -- purchased in the United States,
 Germany, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, and the Philippines -- along with
 other types of clear-plastic tableware. When heated, all leached
 bisphenol A, a chemical that mimics the hormone estrogen, into the
 liquids they held.

 Pollutants that emulate hormones -- especially estrogen -- have
 emerged in recent years as a major environmental concern. Animal
 studies suggest they might increase an individual's likelihood of
 developing certain cancers. During development, exposure to these
 environmental hormones also risks disrupting the normal growth and
 function of reproductive tissues and the brain. Although roughly a
 dozen animal or cellular studies on bisphenol A show a variety of
 biological effects, whether these changes have implications for
 people's health remains controversial.

 Last year, the Environmental Protection Agency launched a new
 program to begin identifying and studying such hormone-mimicking
 pollutants (SN: 10/17/98, p. 251).

 Some of the data by Arizono's team, which are due to be formally
 published in Japanese later this year, were unveiled at a press
 briefing in May by Thomas Natan, research director of the
 Washington D.C.-based National Environmental Trust. The event
 marked the submission of a petition to the Food and Drug
 Administration (FDA) asking that polycarbonate baby bottles and
 foodware be labeled so that concerned consumers could avoid using
 them.

 This clear rigid plastic is a mainstay of baby bottles, picnic
 cutlery, unbreakable kitchen tumblers used to serve up milk and
 other drinks, the carboys that hold bottled water, even the
 cafeteria bowls used for soups.


 Bisphenol A draws attention to itself

 As early as 1936, British chemists reported finding that bisphenol
 A functions like a weak estrogen. Because only traces of unlinked
 bisphenol A were present in plastics, and because the material's
 early uses were not for food containers, the result was largely
 forgotten.

 Until June 1993. That's when some experiments being conducted by
 Aruna V. Krishnan and David Feldman of the Stanford University
 School of Medicine went awry.

 The pair had been looking for signs that yeast might produce
 estrogenlike compounds. But every time the researchers sterilized a
 batch of growth medium to feed their yeast, the flasks holding the
 medium added something that resembled estrogen. As it turns out,
 the flasks were polycarbonate, and they were leaching bisphenol A.

 Though the manufacturer knew its flasks could leach traces of
 bisphenol A upon heating, it had considered the amounts
 inconsequential. They were usually at or below the general limit of
 detection at that time -- about 10 parts per billion. In the
 Stanford tests, however, bisphenol-A migration of just 2 to 5 parts
 per billion thoroughly derailed the yeast experiments (SN: 7/3/93,
 p. 12).

 Since then, a number of labs around the world have been probing to
 see what else leaches bisphenol A. And the more scientists look,
 the more they find.

 For instance, 4 years ago, the plastic resins used to line roughly
 half of the food cans in Europe and 85 percent of U.S. food cans
 proved to be a source of dietary bisphenol A.

 Nicolás Olea and his colleagues at the University of Granada
 analyzed the contents of 20 different brands of canned foods
 purchased at various groceries in Europe and the United States.
 They included a range of popular items: corn, tomatoes, mushrooms,
 even artichoke hearts. Measurable quantities of bisphenol A turned
 up in roughly half of all foods sampled (SN: 6/3/95, p. 341).

 What's troubling, Olea noted, is that consumers have no way of
 knowing whether their canned goods have been packed in a
 plastic-lined container. That information was not provided on the
 label.

 One year later, Olea's team reported finding that bisphenol A
 leaches from some of the plastic resins commonly used to seal tooth
 surfaces. While these sealants reduce the risk that treated teeth
 will develop cavities, the Spanish researchers pointed out that
 newly applied sealants leave measurable quantities of bisphenol A
 in the mouth. It turned up in samples of saliva collected an hour
 after treatment -- and in one case, 2 years later (SN: 4/6/96, p.
 214).

 Food and Drug Administration chemists were next to weigh in on
 bisphenol A. Two years ago, they reported that some unbound
 bisphenol A leached from polycarbonate baby bottles and juice cups
 that had been heated. There findings also suggested that some of
 the heating had actually started degrading the plastic -- freeing
 up additional bisphenol A for leaching, said John E. Biles, one of
 the study's authors (SN: 10/18/97, p. 255).

 However, the FDA data indicated that the amount of bisphenol A that
 leached into a fatty material -- designed to simulate infant
 formula -- was quite small. Now, Arizono's group has employed a
 sensitive new analytical technique to assay for the hormone mimic.
 Their data indicate that through normal use, polycarbonates leach
 more bisphenol A than reports by others had indicated. The
 concentrations of bisphenol A that result are in the same range as
 those that caused abnormalities in rats.


 Well-used polycarbonates leach the most

 Most earlier studies investigated bisphenol-A leaching by new
 laboratory ware, new dental sealants, or new bottles. To probe
 how wear and tear might affect the migration of this chemical,
 Arizono's team compared rates of bisphenol A release from shiny
 new baby bottles and from bottles that were hazy and crackled,
 reflecting years of use.

 Because heating, such as the boiling used to sterilize bottles,
 facilitates bisphenol-A release, Arizono put 90 °C water in contact
 with the polycarbonate materials for 30 minutes and then measured
 how much bisphenol A ended up in the water.

 For new baby bottles, the water picked up between 1 and 3.5 parts
 per billion (ppb) bisphenol A. Water heated in used but relatively
 clear bottles sometimes picked up as much as 6.5 ppb. Water in very
 worn and heavily scratched bottles acquired between 10 and 28 ppb
 of the compound.

 Coming from a culture that esteems its soup, Arizono then filled
 polycarbonate soup bowls with 75 °C water. After 30 minutes, this
 water contained up to 2 ppb bisphenol A.

 Why use water for all these studies when one earlier FDA study went
 so far as to assay migration from baby bottles into juice and
 infant formula? "Unfortunately," says Natan, such foods can "hide
 BPA from detection," masking the magnitude of any migration. He
 says Arizono stayed with water to be sure he could detect even
 small traces of the adulterant.

 Natan's assessment was "reasonable," an FDA scientist acknowledged,
 speaking on the condition that he not be named. When testing "a
 more complex matrix [than water] -- the apple juice, or infant
 formula -- we have a much higher detection limit," he explained.
 In fact, he pointed out, when working with those foods, FDA
 chemists had difficulty finding adulterant concentrations any lower
 than 100 ppb. However, he told Science News OnLine, foods or
 simulated foods "generally exaggerate what will actually migrate
 into a real food" -- meaning it should identify a worst-case upper
 bound on risk, provided any migration exceeds the detection
 threshold.

 Since those earlier studies, FDA's detection threshold has been
 dropping. In one analysis of infant formula, published a year ago,
 it found 13 to 15 parts per billion of bisphenol A in the drink,
 with most of the hormone mimic coming from the cans' internal
 coating. Newer, unpublished data by the agency's chemists have also
 detected the migration of bisphenol A into some vegetables from
 food-can linings. Here, the foods accumulated between 5 and 39 ppb
 of the pollutant, the FDA reports.

 The new Japanese study also looked at bisphenol-A migration from
 the resin used to line food cans. In Japan, vending machines
 dispense tea and coffee. Arizono explains that these canned drinks
 have become the Japanese snack-drink corollary to Coke and Pepsi in
 the United States. Though soft drinks stored in plastic-lined cans
 picked up less than 1 ppb of bisphenol A, oolong tea acquired at
 least 7 ppb -- and coffee a whopping 90 to 127 ppb. The
 manufacturer reformulated its coffee containers as a result of
 this study, Arizono notes.


 New actions

 Concerned by these new data, together with bisphenol-A toxicity
 studies conducted in animals, the National Environmental Trust
 joined with 11 other consumer, health, religious and environmental
 organizations in petitioning FDA to:

    + promptly identify all constituents of plastic food containers
      having the potential to migrate into foods to which children
      are routinely exposed,

    + implement a strategy to eliminate or reduce children's
      exposure to such materials, especially bisphenol A,

    + allow leached materials from plastic to remain in the food
      supply "only after [manufacturers] have provided substantial
      affirmative evidence of safety -- a burden that is not to be
      met upon a showing merely of an absence of evidence of harm,"

    + and work with other federal agencies, such as the EPA and the
      National Toxicology Program, to investigate possible low-dose
      effects of such materials leaching from plastics.

 To date, FDA has not formally responded to the petition.

 The Society of the Plastics Industry (SPI), however, has responded.
 It challenges the consortium's campaign, saying: "Over four decades
 of research show that polycarbonate food containers and baby
 bottles are safe." Moreover, one spokesman notes, since parents
 have made the switch from glass to plastic drink bottles, children
 suffer fewer dangerous accidents. Finally, SPI argues that small
 quantities of bisphenol A pose no health hazard, so the leaching of
 trace amounts should not be used to scare consumers.

 In fact, there is considerable difference of opinion about the
 significance of biological changes seen in animals exposed to
 bisphenol A. In some cases, adults that had been exposed to the
 hormonelike substance during fetal development showed curious
 abnormalities. For instance, Frederick S. vom Saal at the
 University of Missouri-Columbia has reported that the prostates of
 some mice fetally exposed to 2 ppb bisphenol A were larger than
 normal, though no cancers were present. So, arguments have erupted
 on the significance of such changes.

 Despite several attempts, plastics industry scientists have also
 failed to replicate vom Saal's findings. There has been
 considerable acrimony at scientific meetings between industry
 scientists and vom Saal about whether they are all using the
 appropriate methodology to probe for effects.

 Clearly, the jury is still out.


 Until a verdict is returned, what can a cautious parent do?

 The National Environmental Trust recommends switching to baby
 bottles and foodware that is not made from polycarbonates. For
 instance, baby bottles manufactured from a pliable, milky-colored
 plastic contain no polycarbonates.

 Natan advocates that people who prefer to go on using
 polycarbonates should consider discarding any that show obvious
 signs of wear, such as a somewhat cloudy, crackled appearance. He
 also recommends heating foods and drinks outside of the plastics
 and then transferring them into the plastic only after they are
 cool enough to eat or drink.


 Related Readings:

      Biles, J.E., et al. 1997. Determination of bisphenol-A in
      reusable polycarbonate food-contact plastics and migration to
      food-simulating liquids. Journal of Agricultural and Food
      Chemistry 45(September):3541.

      Hileman, B. 1999. Bisphenol A: Regulatory, scientific puzzle
      -- concerns about health effects of estrogen mimic trigger a
      flurry of intense research. Chemical and Engineering News 75
      (March 24):37.

      Raloff, J. 1997. Dental sealant safety reconsidered. Science
      News 152(Nov. 22):324.
           http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arc97/11_22_97/fob1.htm

      _____. 1997. A pollutant that can alter growth. Science News
      152(Oct. 18):255.

      _____. 1997. Lacing food with an estrogen mimic. Science News
      152(Oct. 18):255.

      _____. 1996. Estrogenic agents leach from dental sealant.
      Science News 149(Apr. 6):214.

      _____. 1995. Additional sources of dietary estrogens. Science
      News 147(June 3):341.

      _____. 1993. Plastics may shed chemical estrogens. Science
      News 144(July 3):12.

      Takao, Y., ... and K. Arizono. 1999. Fast screening for
      Bisphenol A in environmental water and in food by solid-phase
      microextraction. Journal of Health Science 45:39.

      vom Saal, F.S., et al. 1998. A physiologically based approach
      to the study of bisphenol A and other estrogenic chemicals on
      the size of reproductive organs, daily sperm production, and
      behavior. Toxicology and Industrial Health 14
      (January-March):239.

      1999. Baby alert: New findings about plastics. Consumer
      Reports 64(May): 28.


 Sources:

      Koji Arizono
      Faculty of Environmental and Symbiotic Sciences
      Prefectural University Kumamoto
      Kumamoto
      JAPAN

      Tom Natan
      National Environmental Trust
      1200 18 Street, N.W.
      Washington, D.C. 20036

      Society of the Plastics Industry
      1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 600 K
      Washington, DC 20006-1301
      Web sites: http://www.socplas.org
      http://www.plasticsinfo.org
      http://www.bisphenol-a.org

      Ruth Welch
      FDA Press Office
      H.F.S. 555
      200 C Street, SW
      Washington, D.C. 20204


 Prepared by Janet Raloff, senior editor of Science News.

 July 24, 1999

 Copyright (c) 1999 Science Service. All rights reserved.





<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to