http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52568-2000Jun23.html
CIA Blocks Manuscript Of Former Operative
     
By Vernon Loeb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, June 24, 2000; Page A04 


The Central Intelligence Agency is refusing to allow a flamboyant former 
operative to publish portions of a manuscript about his 14-year spy career, 
saying numerous passages in the book contain classified information. 

The CIA's simmering dispute with former operative Bob Baer erupted last week 
when CIA security officers arrived at the downtown office of Baer's attorney, 
Victoria Toensing, a former Justice Department official, and picked up all 
copies of a letter Toensing had written to the CIA on Baer's behalf.

CIA officials contended that the letter contained classified information, 
including a list of the disputed subjects in Baer's nonfiction manuscript, 
and should not have been circulated outside secure government facilities, CIA 
spokesman Bill Harlow said.

Harlow added that Toensing's son, Brady C. Toensing, an attorney in the firm, 
agreed to delete a copy of the letter from a computer drive at the law office.

Baer could not be reached yesterday for comment. Neither Victoria Toensing 
nor her son was available for comment.

Baer, who left the CIA in 1997, appeared as a consultant on the CBS News 
program "60 Minutes" three weeks ago and lent credibility to the account of 
an Iranian defector who claimed to have documentary evidence that Iran was 
behind the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am jetliner over Lockerbie, Scotland, and 
the 1996 attack on a U.S. military housing complex in Saudi Arabia.

CIA and FBI officials subsequently concluded that the defector, who 
identified himself as a high-ranking Iranian intelligence officer named Ahmad 
Behbahani, was an impostor who lacked basic knowledge of Iran's intelligence 
apparatus.

In 1997, Baer was the mysterious intelligence officer identified during 
Senate hearings as "Bob from the CIA" after he secretly told a friend on the 
staff of the House intelligence committee about the unusual efforts of Roger 
Tamraz, an oil pipeline promoter and Democratic Party donor, to secure an 
audience at the Clinton White House.

When Tamraz's efforts to curry favor at the White House became a scandal, the 
CIA's inspector general began investigating Baer for improperly contacting 
Congress, prompting his friends at the agency and on Capitol Hill to view him 
as a convenient scapegoat.

If all that weren't enough fodder for a book, Baer also played a key role in 
helping a group of Iraqi dissidents led by Ahmed Chalabi, chairman of the 
Iraqi National Congress (INC), plan a direct assault on Iraq's army from a 
safe haven in northern Iraq in March 1995. The Iraqis referred to the attack 
as "the Bob plan."

But the Clinton administration backed away, ordering Baer to tell Chalabi 
that the United States was withdrawing its support for any invasion, a move 
that split two Kurdish groups backing Chalabi and ultimately led to a 
massacre of INC soldiers by Iraqi forces the following year.

These and other episodes from Baer's career were recounted in the manuscript 
he submitted in December to the CIA's Publication Review Board for clearance.

The PRB is responsible for making sure all current and former CIA employees 
abide by lifetime secrecy agreements. Those agreements require them to submit 
for review anything related to intelligence that they intend to publish or 
broadcast.

After negotiating with the PRB in recent months over passages the board 
refused to clear for publication, Baer filed an appeal earlier this month 
with executive director David Carey, the official empowered under CIA 
regulations to rule on disputes involving the review board. Once the 
executive director rules, the next level of appeal is to the federal courts.

"There are portions of [the manuscript] which we believe to be classified, 
and we were working with him to find ways for him to tell his story without 
damaging national security," Harlow said. In the past five years, he added, 
the PRB has cleared 1,400 manuscripts of books, articles and screenplays and 
generated four appeals to the executive director.

The CIA has a history of zealously enforcing agreements requiring 
prepublication review of any written or oral statements regarding 
intelligence beyond "spontaneous" remarks made to journalists or in public 
forums.

In its most celebrated dispute involving prepublication review, the CIA sued 
former operative Frank Snepp over "Decent Interval," his best-selling 1977 
account of how the CIA and the State Department bungled the evacuation of 
Saigon and abandoned thousands of loyal South Vietnamese. Snepp took the case 
all the way to the Supreme Court, which upheld the secrecy agreements and 
said the CIA could seize all of Snepp's profits from the book.


© 2000 The Washington Post Company  


Reply via email to