-Caveat Lector-

Formula for news slanting
BBy Charley Rees
The Orlando Sentinel
September 10, 2000

http://orlandosentinel.com/automagic/columnists/2000-09-10/OPEDreese10s09100
0.html

George W. Bush called a New York Times reporter a bad name and
didn't apologize. I like that.

One local fellow remarked that anyone who knows anything about
the New York Times knows that Bush was using a euphemism. I don't
know if he was recalling when the New York Times covered up
Joseph Stalin's crimes in the 1930s or when it was selling Fidel
Castro as the new George Washington of the Caribbean. When it
comes to spotting evil on the left, the New York Times and the
Central Intelligence Agency have similar records.

At any rate, anyone offended by Bush's remarks, are those who are
already committed to Prince Albert Gore, privileged child and
tobacco farmer. Lest you worry about the sensitive feelings of
American journalists, let me reassure you that there is no more
arrogant or profane trade in the United States.

People these days are used to the idea of slanted news and biased
coverage. The press, by and large, however is blind to its own
sins. It's not just the natural defensive arrogance of an
institution accountable to no one, but when a liberal pronounces
a conservative a fool, he thinks that he's just telling the
truth. To a liberal, the idea, even the possibility, that he, the
liberal, might be wrong is strictly beyond the pale.

Of course even liberals are entitled to their opinions, but if
they are journalists, they are not entitled to slant the news to
bolster their opinions. That's where American journalism has gone
wrong.

The formula for slanting the news is quite simple. If you don't
like the guy, you maximize his mistakes and minimize his
successes; if you like him, you reverse the process. You can
watch this process in the presidential campaign. Remember,
in-depth national surveys have shown that America's journalistic
elite are, with rare exceptions, liberal Democrats. Any slip of
the tongue by George W. Bush will be big news while Al Gore's
more serious sins will be ignored or minimized.

Some years ago, for an article in a journalism trade magazine, an
enterprising reporter interviewed editors who had been
interviewed for news stories. You guessed it. The editors had the
same complaints that readers have. Many said it was obvious the
reporter had already decided what the story was going to be even
before he asked the first question. Some complained of being
misquoted.

This is all inside stuff and of no real interest to you, the
reader, except as a reminder to read critically anything you see
in the press or on television. The most insidious sin is to take
things out of context. Another technique is ignoring people with
opinions the liberal paper doesn't like.

I know of one case in which a woman was elected president of the
national Right to Life organization. The newspaper's readers
never knew, even though she lived within blocks of the office.
Yet when the late Abbie Hoffman made an appearance at a
university (he wasn't late at that time) well out of the paper's
circulation area, it gave his puerile ranting two pages.

A similar technique translated to television is to pick the
handsomest, most-articulate person you can find to represent the
opinion you favor and the ugliest, least-articulate person you
can find to represent the opposing view. Then, of course, you
just turn on the cameras and let them have a "fair" debate.

View and read everything with skepticism. Remember that truth and
information are not synonyms. And do learn to think for yourself.
There already are more than enough sheep in this world.

=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to