-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/et?ac=003709246602319&rtmo=fqosMYvs&atmo=rrrrrrv

s&pg=/et/00/10/28/wmic28.html
Click Here: <A
HREF="http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/et?ac=003709246602319&rtmo=fqosMYvs&atmo=r

rrrrrvs&pg=/et/00/10/28/wmic28.html">Microsoft humiliated as hackers crack
Windows</A>
-----
ISSUE 1982  Saturday 28 October 2000


Microsoft humiliated as hackers crack Windows
By Robert Uhlig and Andrew Cave in New York






Microsoft


Security (or lack of it) Issues Concerning Microsoft Products - International
Anti-Microsoft Campaign


Press releases - FBI


Hacking - dmoz


Virus Bulletin


Data Protection


AntiOnline


L0pht Heavy Industries


2600



'It's like tackling a cryptic crossword'
Program code is top trophy for computer raider
Obsession led to top job in net security
Why Russia excels in new cybercrime
See City Comment

MICROSOFT, the world's leading computer software firm, called in the FBI
yesterday to investigate one of the most embarrassing breaches of computer
security in corporate history.
Hackers were reported to have copied the source code blueprints of the latest
versions of its flagship Windows and Office products, which are installed on
90 per cent of the world's personal computers. The break-in was discovered
when security employees detected passwords being remotely sent to an e-mail
account in St Petersburg, Russia.

Electronic footprints reportedly showed that the passwords had been used to
transfer source code outside Microsoft's campus at Redmond, near Seattle. The
hackers are believed to have used a "trojan" computer program known as Qaz,
which was first identified in China in July.
Microsoft was unable to say how long the hacking had been going on, although
some reports said the attack could date back three months. The Windows source
code is one of the world's most closely-guarded industrial secrets and a M
icrosoft spokesman condemned the intrusion as "a deplorable act of industrial
espionage".

However, the company later played down its initial announcement that the
codes had been copied after rivals revelled in the firm falling prey to a
rather banal security breach. Steve Ballmer, the chief executive, when asked
how damaging the break-in was, said: "Not very, but we want to make sure it
doesn't get that way and that's why we called in the FBI."

He denied that any source codes had been stolen, but added: "It is clear that
hackers did see some of our source code." Microsoft has been repeatedly
castigated for woeful levels of security on its products. Yesterday's
humiliation did not come as a great surprise within the industry. The
break-in was the latest in a string of security breaches of Microsoft
products and networks that the company has addressed often only after hackers
have pointed out the loopholes.

The Lovebug and Melissa viruses were able to wreak such major destruction,
costing corporate e-mail systems tens of billions of pounds, only because
Microsoft repeatedly ignored criticisms of software security. A similar
complacency led to Bill Gates's company being forced to close its Hotmail
e-mail service last year after a security breach allowed anyone to read
subscribers' personal messages.

Of most embarrassment to Microsoft is that the latest breach was made by the
Qaz "trojan", a remarkably well-known attacker that ought to be barred by the
most basic anti-virus software. If the code has been copied, Microsoft could
face a demand for a "ransom" to prevent it being released on the internet.
The code could also be used to make malicious software to attack Windows and
Office products.

The company will also be anxious to ensure that highly-saleable research and
development files, litigation papers, government discussion documents and
corporate strategy information have not been accessed. Graham Satchwell, a
former senior Microsoft investigator who now runs a security consultancy,
said: "If it was a prankster, it is most unlikely that they would do nothing
to advertise their success. That leaves the possibility that it is something
more sinister."
The development had no adverse impact on Microsoft shares yesterday, which
rose $3.5 to $68 in early trading.

© Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 2000

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to