-Caveat Lector-

--- Yardbird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 Subject: McVeigh's "Confession"
 From: Jon Roland  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 McVeigh's "Confession"

 First, we don't really know who the person is who is
 in custody. We may call him "Timothy McVeigh",
 but it could be a surrogate.
 No matter who it is, it is not necessarily
 the person who set of the truck bomb.
_________________________________________________
Nakano comments:
This is right on Jon. Even more, we don't know for
sure who was stopped for speeding and then arrested in
Noble County Oklahoma about 90 minutes after the
bombing of the Murrah Federal Building. It seems
that person was trying to attract attention to
himself and get taken into custody. The person we
were told was McVeigh was speeding with the rear
license place dangling down.(according to news
reports) When the officer pulled him over, he told the
officer he was carrying a concealed pistol and so
he was arrested.
"McVeigh" was then held in the Noble County Jail
for 3 days, during which time no one at the jail
suspected he was involved in the bombing. They were
within 30 minutes of release "McVeigh", when they
got a phone call from the FBI saying: "We think you
have the guy we are looking for...hold him!"
Interesting huh?
Then the FBI people came to the jail and took
"McVeigh".  But that's not all they took.
They took the fingerprint records, "mugshot" photos,
the negatives, the blanket, sheets, pillow, and
mattress from the jailcell where he had been held.
The Noble County Sheriff later complained in an
interview that the FBI had never returned any of
these things.
In other words, they took every bit of evidence of
who it was that had been in that jail cell.
We know for a fact there was a BATF Agent who
looked almost like a twin brother of Tim McVeigh.
The BATF has never responded to questions as to
the whereabouts of this agent during this period.
Was it the McVeigh "double" in that jail?
________________________________________________
Jon Roland continues:

"The only way any "confession" can be credible is if
 it reveals new information that only the guilty
 person could know.
> If one reads what has been released about what
  he is alleged to have said,
> there is no such revelation. Indeed, it all
  seems contrived to support the government theory
> of the case, including the degree and nature of the
> complicity of Terry Nichols.
__________________________________________________
Nakano comments:
Since "McVeigh" was first brought into the public's
awareness as the bomber, there has been a suspicious
lack of information from him.  There have been a
few very limited "jailhouse interviews" conducted
under close supervision and with no questions
permitted about the Oklahoma bombing.
McVeigh did not testify at his trial.
After beinf found guiltly, he read a short curious
statement which did not mention the bombing or his
any reference to being guilty or innocent.
Since the trial he has been kept in deep
confinement and out of the public's attention.
In this time when "everybody is famous for 15
minutes",
we have books written by or about the winners of
TV game shows, the mistresses of politicians,
tattletale books on just about every person who has
gained any fame or notice for any reason.
Question: Where are the books about Tim McVeigh?
Where are the newspaper articles by reporters who
have done in-depth interviews?
And now we are told, "McVeigh" has waived all
appeals so he will be quickly executed.
We are told, there will be no autopsy and so,
conveniently, there will be no medical historical
record of who this person really is....or was.

The most disturbing thing about all of this is the
manner in which the gullible public is willing to
simply accept all the official explanations
without question. Could it be that most people
are afraid to learn that their government isn't
telling them the "whole truth, and nothing
but the truth"?
     Nakano
_____________________________________________________
 So what can we be certain of in this case? We can be
 certain that the truck
 bomb could not have caused the damage to the
 building that occurred. It would be physically
  impossible for that to occur. It would violate
  the laws of physics. There were charges detonated
  inside the building that caused most of the damage
  and loss of life."


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to