-Caveat Lector-
> All I can say is this is a prime example of false
> logic that has been used
> by UFO debunkers for a long time. It goes like this:
> I can prove John Doe
> lied when he said he was flown to Venus in a UFO;
> therefore everything John
> Doe has ever said is also a lie.
Senor Stonehouse, don't misconstrue me: i'm not a UFO
debunker by any means. nor am i saying what you seem
to think i am. let me clarify: if one can prove John
Doe's photographs of the craft he supposedly
encountered to be hoaxed, one can pretty safely assume
that his tale of the encounter is also a work of
fiction. it doesn't mean everything he's ever said is
also a lie, but it calls into question anything he's
said pertaining to the alleged encounter event.
> My point was supposed to be that if by chance our
> astronauts were met on the
> moon by unknowns that were not part of the
> conventional wisdom, NASA might
> choose not to inform the public. Thus the doctored
> photos would be
> necessary.
perhaps, but why lie to the public about something
like this? i can fully comprehend that the government
has every reason to cover up their relationship with
extraterrestrials, but faking photos of the lunar
landing seems sort of... tacky. following that up by
lying to the public about what the moon is really like
(in terms of atmospheric condition, for instance) is
just silly, especially when our education (or
indoctination, as you so succinctly put it) and our
childrens' education is in some way based on their
findings.
> Since when does a NASA apologist say they faked
> photos of the lunar lander
> because there's no dust on the landing pads? In a
> one-hour documentary on
> Apollo 13 Tuesday on the History Channel there was
> footage shown that is
> very suspicious. When the craft is shown from a
> distance, who is taking the
> picture?
> When Armstrong stepped off the ladder, who was
> shooting the video of him? In
> the many books by Apollo astronauts I have found but
> one sentence on this:
> Deke Slayton said the camera extended from Eagle and
> there was a grainy
> black-and-white picture. Very suspicious.
if you're acknowledging the possibility of faked lunar
landing photos, then why chastise someone for doing
the same? that's basically where you lost me in the
first place.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
