a couple counterpoints, dear c.

1. Guess reception over there in UK is not so good, as the message to
    you seems to have gotten garbled, or perhaps you are hallucinating:

    I defended no saba, dear c.
    Glad you're so posh and hip, that you can hold things dear
       to yourself as passe.  Some of you british types seem to
       understand so much that just isn't true, and are hereby
       cordially invited to keep their posh noses permanently
       in their OWN business, not ours.
       Interesting that now you are the expert on what constitutes
            the strengths and weaknesses of internet flames.

Are you folks over there so unimaginative that you cannot
understand or abide the fact that the first sentence was
    DIRECTED to you,  and the subsequent 2 are not?

MY grammar was correct, even though you did not understand it,
and changing the person to whom one is speaking is NOT a function of grammar.

Lame is in the eye, and intellect, of the beholder.

Relax, and enjoy a hamburger.

Boy,  c. is a cranky person.................

You  ARE  the weakest link ...   good bye.

**************************************

"c." wrote:

a couple of points, dear bb 1. defending saba's pox spreading antics? LOL2. paraphrasing anne robinson is so passe this side of the atlantic but i understand some of you american types find her "challenging" and witty, apparently.3. grammer attacks ARE the weakest form of internet flames4. and speaking of which, you speak to me directly and then in the third person. DO get your grammer correct before hypocriticising me dude- it looks awfully lame.  ----- Original Message -----
From: BB
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Aleisha's Stupidity (or Deliberate Terrorism) IsBeyondThe Pale
 You  ARE  the weakest link ...   good bye.

I wonder if keyboards have an upper case, or if the school system teaches
grammer and punctuation nowadays in the U.K.

Boy,  c. is a cranky person.................
 

Reply via email to