-Caveat Lector-
Well, Dale, how is that different than liberal commentators?
She is supposed to be biased as she is a conservative
commentator, not a news reporter or journalist. She does not
present herself as being neutral.
So you do not believe there are politics of the liberal
persuasion being taught in schools? Been there lately?
But what really concerns me is that although two different
posters posted this same article, Coulter is far from the
extreme right as in Falwell and The Christian Coalition. What
would happen if a post from that element appeared? Are
conservative points of view not to be presented, even as this
was done, without comment or endorsement? Did I misread the
Mission Statement of this list? I thought different sides of
the political dialectic were SUPPOSED to be presented for the
purpose of acting it out.
Now it seems to me that this is not true judging from the
reaction to this article, which should have been innocuous in
and of itself. As I said, I have never seen Coulter deemed
extreme. So is one side presenting here for only the
convenience of the opposite (liberal) side to bash and
validate themselves? That would not be very nice, would it?
We have posts from the extreme side of the left in the form of
gays, eco-extremists, wiccans, pagans, anarchists but not from
Falwell nor Christian Coalition, etc. yet even moderate
conservative views draw fire. What is wrong with this
picture, in light of the mission statement?
~Amelia~
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dale Stonehouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Ann Coulter on the Religious Cult of
Liberalism
-Caveat Lector-
No one who actually thinks for him/herself could ever take Ann
Coulter
seriously. She wrote one of many one-sided books trashing the
Clintons and
they are all the same. There are a few defending the Clintons
which are just
as bad on the other side. The only book I have read that even
attempts to
give a balanced view is Jeffrey Toobin's A Vast Right-Wing
Conspiracy.
Coulter doesn't seem to realize she is nothing but a trophy
conservative
taken off the shelf to dazzle strangers when it is convenient.
Those backing
her biased blathering probably snicker that she's a dumb
blonde behind her
back.
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] Ann Coulter on the Religious Cult of
Liberalism
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Do you really believe this?
>
> Because if this is a true viewpoint of persons, boy are they
> buy a Brooklyn
> Bridge propaganda control line.
>
> Om
> K
>
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
