http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3G2O4UIOC&
live=true&tagid=IXLMS1QTICC&subheading=global%20economy




UN calls for reforms to aid
By Alan Beattie in London and Andrew Hill in New York
Published: June 28 2001 18:23GMT | Last Updated: June 29 2001 01:11GMT


A blue-ribbon United Nations panel on Thursday recommended radical reforms to
international aid and a new global carbon tax to fund development.

The high-level panel on financing for development, chaired by Ernesto
Zedillo, the former Mexican president also includes Robert Rubin, the former
US treasury secretary, and Manmohan Singh, the reformist Indian finance
minister during the early 1990s.

In a report released on Thursday, the group called for "a global council at
the highest political level", comprising selected heads of state, to address
the main challenges of globalisation.

It suggested an international tax organisation to monitor unfair tax
competition and combat money laundering.
Its proposals will form the basis of discussion for a summit on development
finance to be held in Mexico next March.
John Williamson, the project director, said the report was intended to
"inject some ideas outside the normal range of thinking".

The report backed the United Nations target for rich countries of giving 0.7
per cent of gross domestic product in aid.

It also recommended that donors stop imposing their own conditions on the use
of aid, and instead place all aid into a common pool which would be disbursed
to individual countries according to plans drawn up before donations are
made.

This could lead to reductions in aid if donor countries were not prepared to
take plans on trust, the panel said.

"But a part of ownership is the right to make mistakes," it said. "A new
relationship with Africa will never be established if donors put safety
first."

Mr Rubin's endorsement of the report - though he expressed reservations about
the practicalities of the proposed global carbon tax - may cause some
surprise among development experts, given the US's past failure to adopt the
policies the report proposes.

The US has relatively low levels of overseas aid and has traditionally tied
some of its aid to purchases from US suppliers.

Mr Rubin defended his record, saying that Congress had prevented any increase
in aid as a percentage of GDP and other countries had opposed untying aid,
even though the Clinton administration had tried to advance the issue.

The former US treasury secretary conceded that it would be a struggle to
convince the public in industrial countries that it was in their own
self-interest to increase overseas development aid.

"It may be very difficult politically but I think it's so much the right
thing to do and so much in our self-interest, that it's a struggle worth
engaging in, even if the politics is very difficult," he said.

Mr Rubin also drew attention to trade liberalisation as an important tool for
banishing poverty, pointing out that "there was nobody who disagreed with
that on the panel".


Reply via email to