In a message dated 7/11/01 12:37:36 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Rule by Secrecy, on the other hand, was so rife with
misreadings of the original texts (which as an academic historian I have
first-hand familiarity with), that most of its assertions are based on
falsity, at least mistaken understanding.


Well if you go by the traditional history books I suppose this would be
correct, his deal is digging deeper and seeking alternative sources for the
hidden history of our planet and in that regard I think Rule By Secrecy is a
good, if rudimentary introduction to conspiracy theory and parahistory.

Bill.

Reply via email to