-Caveat Lector-

From
http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=94254

}}>Begin

Argument
 | Commentators
Robert Fisk: Bush is walking into a trap
16 September 2001
Retaliation is a trap. In a world that was supposed to have learnt
that the rule of law comes above revenge, President Bush appears to
be heading for the very disaster that Osama bin Laden has laid down
for him. Let us have no doubts about what happened in New York and
Washington last week. It was a crime against humanity. We cannot
understand America's need to retaliate unless we accept this bleak,
awesome fact. But this crime was perpetrated – it becomes ever
clearer – to provoke the United States into just the blind, arrogant
punch that the US military is preparing.
Mr bin Laden – every day his culpability becomes more apparent – has
described to me how he wishes to overthrow the pro-American regime of
the Middle East, starting with Saudi Arabia and moving on to Egypt,
Jordan and the other Gulf states. In an Arab world sunk in corruption
and dictatorships – most of them supported by the West – the only act
that might bring Muslims to strike at their own leaders would be a
brutal, indiscriminate assau
lt by the United States. Mr bin Laden is unsophisticated in foreign affairs, but a 
close student of the art and horror of war. He knew how to fight the Russians who 
stayed on in Afghanistan, a Russian monster that revenge
d itself upon its ill-educated, courageous antagonists until, faced with war without 
end, the entire Soviet Union began to fall apart.
The Chechens learnt this lesson. And the man responsible for so much of the bloodbath 
in Chechnya – the career KGB man whose army is raping and murdering the insurgent 
Sunni Muslim population of Chechnya – is now being si
gned up by Mr Bush for his "war against people''. Vladimir Putin must surely have a 
sense of humour to appreciate the cruel ironies that have now come to pass, though I 
doubt if he will let Mr Bush know what happens when
you start a war of retaliation; your army – like the Russian forces in Chechnya – 
becomes locked into battle with an enemy that appears ever more ruthless, ever more 
evil.
But the Americans need look no further than Ariel Sharon's futile war with the 
Palestinians to understand the folly of retaliation. In Lebanon, it was always the 
same. A Hizbollah guerrilla would kill an Israeli occupatio
n soldier, and the Israelis would fire back in retaliation at a village in which a 
civilian would die. The Hizbollah would retaliate with a Katyusha missile attack over 
the Israeli border, and the Israelis would retaliate
 again with a bombardment of southern Lebanon. In the end, the Hizbollah – the "centre 
of world terror'' according to Mr Sharon – drove the Israelis out of Lebanon.
In Israel/Palestine, it is the same story. An Israeli soldier shoots a Palestinian 
stone-thrower. The Palestinians retaliate by killing a settler. The Israelis then 
retaliate by sending a murder squad to kill a Palestinia
n gunman. The Palestinians retaliate by sending a suicide bomber into a pizzeria. The 
Israelis then retaliate by sending F-16s to bomb a Palestinian police station. 
Retaliation leads to retaliation and more retaliation. W
ar without end.
And while Mr Bush – and perhaps Mr Blair – prepare their forces, they explain so 
meretriciously that this is a war for "democracy and liberty'', that it is about men 
who are "attacking civilisation''. "America was targete
d for attack,'' Mr Bush informed us on Friday, "because we are the brightest beacon 
for freedom and opportunity in the world.'' But this is not why America was attacked. 
If this was an Arab-Muslim apocalypse, then it is i
ntimately associated with events in the Middle East and with America's stewardship of 
the area. Arabs, it might be added, would rather like some of that democracy and 
liberty and freedom that Mr Bush has been telling them
 about. Instead, they get a president who wins 98 per cent in the elections 
(Washington's friend, Mr Mubarak) or a Palestinian police force, trained by the CIA, 
that tortures and sometimes kills its people in prison. The
Syrians would also like a little of that democracy. So would the Saudis. But their 
effete princes are all friends of America – in many cases, educated at US universities.
I will always remember how President Clinton announced that Saddam Hussein – another 
of our grotesque inventions – must be overthrown so that the people of Iraq could 
choose their own leaders. But if that happened, it wou
ld be the first time in Middle Eastern history that Arabs have been permitted to do 
so. No, it is "our'' democracy and "our'' liberty and freedom that Mr Bush and Mr 
Blair are talking about, our Western sanctuary that is
under attack, not the vast place of terror and injustice that the Middle East has 
become.
Let me illustrate what I mean. Nineteen years ago today, the greatest act of terrorism 
– using Israel's own definition of that much misused word – in modern Middle Eastern 
history began. Does anyone remember the anniversa
ry in the West? How many readers of this article will remember it? I will take a tiny 
risk and say that no other British newspaper – certainly no American newspaper – will 
today recall the fact that on 16 September 1982,
Israel's Phalangist militia allies started their three-day orgy of rape and knifing 
and murder in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila that cost 1,800 
lives. It followed an Israeli invasion of Lebanon – desi
gned to drive the PLO out of the country and given the green light by the then US 
Secretary of State, Alexander Haig – which cost the lives of 17,500 Lebanese and 
Palestinians, almost all of them civilians. That's probabl
y three times the death toll in the World Trade Centre. Yet I do not remember any 
vigils or memorial services or candle-lighting in America or the West for the innocent 
dead of Lebanon; I don't recall any stirring speeche
s about democracy or liberty. In fact, my memory is that the United States spent most 
of the bloody months of July and August 1982 calling for "restraint".
No, Israel is not to blame for what happened last week. The culprits were Arabs, not 
Israelis. But America's failure to act with honour in the Middle East, its promiscuous 
sale of missiles to those who use them against ci
vilians, its blithe disregard for the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqi children 
under sanctions of which Washington is the principal supporter – all these are 
intimately related to the society that produced the Arabs
who plunged America into an apocalypse of fire last week.
America's name is literally stamped on to the missiles fired by Israel into 
Palestinian buildings in Gaza and the West Bank. Only four weeks ago, I identified one 
of them as an AGM 114-D air-to-ground rocket made by Boein
g and Lockheed-Martin at their factory in – of all places – Florida, the state where 
some of the suiciders trained to fly.
It was fired from an Apache helicopter (made in America, of course) during the 1982 
Israeli invasion of Lebanon, when hundreds of cluster bombs were dropped in civilian 
areas of Beruit by the Israelis in contravention of
undertakings given to the United States. Most of the bombs had US Naval markings and 
America then suspended a shipment of fighter bombers to Israel – for less than two 
months.
The same type of missile – this time an AGM 114-C made inGeorgia – was fired by the 
Israelis into the back of an ambulance near the Lebanese village of Mansori, killing 
two women and four children. I collected the pieces
of the missile, including its computer coding plate, flew to Georgia and presented 
them to the manufacturers at the Boeing factory. And what did the developer of the 
missile say to me when I showed him photographs of the
children his missile had killed? "Whatever you do," he told me, "don't quote me as 
saying anything critical of the policies of Israel."
I'm sure the father of those children, who was driving the ambulance, will have been 
appalled by last week's events, but I don't suppose, given the fate of his own wife – 
one of the women killed – that he was in a mood to
 send condolences to anyone. All these facts, of course, must be forgotten now.
Every effort will be made in the coming days to switch off the "why'' question and 
concentrate on the who, what and how. CNN and most of the world's media have already 
obeyed this essential new war rule. I've already seen
 what happens when this rule is broken. When The Independent published my article on 
the connection between Middle Eastern injustice and the New York holocaust, the BBC's 
24-hour news channel produced an American commenta
tor who remarked that "Robert Fisk has won the prize for bad taste''. When I raised 
the same point on an Irish radio talk show, the other guest, a Harvard lawyer, 
denounced me as a bigot, a liar, a "dangerous man'' and –
of course – potentially anti-Semitic. The Irish pulled the plug on him.
No wonder we have to refer to the terrorists as "mindless''. For if we did not, we 
would have to explain what went on in those minds. But this attempt to censor the 
realities of the war that has already begun must not be
permitted to continue. Look at the logic. Secretary of State Colin Powell was 
insisting on Friday that his message to the Taliban is simple: they have to take 
responsibility for sheltering Mr bin Laden. "You cannot separa
te your activities from the activities of the perpetrators,'' he warned. But the 
Americans absolutely refuse to associate their own response to their predicament with 
their activities in the Middle East. We are supposed t
o hold our tongues, even when Ariel Sharon – a man whose name will always be 
associated with the massacre at Sabra and Shatila – announces that Israel also wishes 
to join the battle against "world terror''.
No wonder the Palestinians are fearful. In the past four days, 23 Palestinians have 
been killed in the West Bank and Gaza, an astonishing figure that would have been 
front-page news had America not been blitzed. If Israel
 signs up for the new conflict, then the Palestinians – by fighting the Israelis – 
will, by extension, become part of the "world terror'' against which Mr Bush is 
supposedly going to war. Not for nothing did Mr Sharon cla
im that Yasser Arafat had connections with Osama bin Laden.
I repeat: what happened in New York was a crime against humanity. And that means 
policemen, arrests, justice, a whole new international court at The Hague if 
necessary. Not cruise missiles and "precision'' bombs and Musli
m lives lost in revenge for Western lives. But the trap has been sprung. Mr Bush – 
perhaps we, too – are now walking into it.
Also in Commentators
Najam Sethi: Pakistan could be plunged into anarchy if it fails to back America
Lawrence Freedman: The enemy may be shadowy, but this  war will follow the usual 
battle lines  This is how  Don't underestimate the strength  of military power against 
terrorists
Alissa Quart: Even the bankers have started saying hello...
Yvonne Roberts: A vision of a different, more humane society
Michael Byers: The hawks  are hovering. Prepare for more bombs
Legal |
Contact us |
Using our Content |
© 2001 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd


End<{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to