-Caveat Lector-
> In the US there is much talk about the notion, that this attack has
> ushered in a "new breed of terrorist." That these were bright and
> educated individuals as opposed to the desperate and angry outcasts
> of yesterday.
>
New breeds are most certainly being revealed this time around, but,
at very best, the evidence so far presented to the public suggest only
that these 'bright and educated individuals' existed and may have posessed
the skills suggested by their training. I'm sure that Manchurian
candidates and straw persons alike come in many flavours. For
example, whether they were the only 'foe' on board the aircraft, or did
themselves carrying out the acts witnessed by us all remains unknown (at
least to me). The discovery of Islamic and Arabic artifacts, IDs and paper
trails by these guys appears a little odd to me (cocky, smart or
diversive?) and our assumptive logical evaluations of such 'evidence'
needs be treated with constant scrutiny.
As another example, the assumption that the original pilots steered into
the twin towers is now questionable in the minds of many, but how many of
us would be willing to entertain the idea that a non-piloted remote control
system could have been used to guide the hijacked aircraft to their new
trajectories ? I'm not wanting to suggest that this is what actually
happened, but posit as an explanatory option, the technology certainly
exists.
This possibility is not inconsistent with the view that a 'new breed of
terrorist' as implied by the questioner does indeed now exist; but my
point here, is that we may in the future be 'finding' any number of
'bright and educated individuals' on a crime scene, who by intellectual
association and leaning seem to 'fit' suspect-profiles but MAY have
little/no knowledge of their complicities. Hopefully I'm wrong.
Thoughts ?
Cheers,
Tony.
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
