http://english.pravda.ru/usa/2001/11/03/20022.html
ANTI-GLOBALIST RESISTANCE BEYOND LEFT AND RIGHT:
AN EMERGING TREND THAT IS DEFINING A NEW PARADIGM IN
REVOLUTIONARY STRUGGLE
“If I told you I thought the world was controlled by a
handful of capitalists and corporate bosses, you would
say I was a left-winger,” an anarchist black blocker
told PRAVDA.Ru at a recent demonstration against the
Afghanistan War. “But if I told you who I though the
capitalists and corporate bosses were, you’d say I was
far right,” the bandana-clad youth added with a wink.
The masked gutter punk was not alone. His perspective
-- a broad blend of left-wing socialism and far-right
nationalist and libertarian views – has been slowly
infiltrating both extremes of the political spectrum,
particularly in the anti-globalist movement, and has
been leading to a new synthesis of doctrine – “beyond
left and right” – that is coalescing around a number
of tendencies – national anarchism, social
nationalism, national bolshevism – that some are
calling the fastest growing ideological movement on
the fringe. Though significantly divergent in their
beliefs, these ideologies are at the core of what is
being called the “Third Position” – a collection of
radical anti-capitalist, anti-globalist and
anti-imperialist views that that are outspoken in
their rejection of the corporate state, of social
democracy, of Marxism, and of Zionism.
But just as these ideologies are gaining more
adherents, they are also becoming the target of more
disinformation, as the extreme Old Left-ists of the
anti-globalist movement call conferences to attack
these ideas, and as the self-righteous defenders of
neo-liberalism try to force these doctrines’ square
peg into their round hole of “hate” and “fascism”.
Decadence is fighting back, but as the proponents of
these ideas steadily resist being labeled as “far
right” by the defenders of the neo-liberal
corporate-socialist status quo, the globalist power
structure has found itself in a boxing match with a
body of water.
ORIGIN -- THE OPPOSITION TO HITLER
“Two million Germans have been or still are guests in
the cells of the Gestapo, or are or have been familiar
with the delights of Dachau, Buchenwald, or
Oranienburg. These two million have parents, wives,
children. In other words, about ten million human
beings have suffered personally from Hitler’s methods.
…
“The German people are said to be entirely devoted to
[their] Fuehrer. … No[!] … The German people want a
German revolution … [they] want liberty at home …
[they] want liberty abroad … [they] want peace in
Germany, peace in Europe, and peace in the world.”
-- Otto Strasser, Hitler and I (1940)
“Fascism” and “national socialism” have been presented
by the bourgeois media and those phony “independent”
and “extremist” political movements that want
mainstream acceptability as monolithic doctrines that
governed entire countries with the unanimous consent
of their people. Zionist writers have turned these
representations into entire schools of thought that
label whole races and classes of people – “Germans” or
“Swiss bankers” for example – as “haters” or
“anti-Semites”, holding all national or group
aspirations of those people as inherently suspect, and
inflicting collective punishment both on those people
and their descendents in the form of endless
“reparations” for “crimes” that may or may not have
occurred. This kind of racial and ethnic reductionism,
in alliance with the mindless nihilistic hatred of
slogan-shouting Marxist and Trotskyist socialism, has
clouded and obscured any real understanding of the
ideological tendencies within the anti-communist and
anti-liberal socialist movements that developed in
Europein the early part of the 20th Century. From this
ignorance has sprung the inability of the
liberal-capitalist / state-socialist left to respond
to the re-emergence of these doctrines in the early
21st Century.
In the struggle to come to terms with the
anti-Monarchical, Bolshevist and capitalist tendencies
that swept across Eurasia like the black plague, the
finest minds of Europe developed ideologies which,
though semantically similar to their ruling class
cousins, were radically opposed to the kind of
bourgeois pragmatism which catapulted leaders like
Hitler and Mussolini into the seats of government.
These thinkers, like Otto Strasser, who led the
remnant of the left-wing of the National Socialists in
revolt against Hitler after the 1934 [check] purges,
and Julius Evola, who lorded over Mussolini in his own
country and who was banned from lecturing in Germany
because of his seditious doctrine, have been largely
ignored in the Western world until recently, as the
struggle between Bolshevik communism and American
centralized-capitalism dominated for fifty years the
international political landscape. With the collapse
of the Soviet Union, and the collapse of America into
imperial overstretch and ideological decay, the
thinkers of the world have been free to re-invent the
ideas of the past – and these ideas have exploded
outwards in the international globalist movement. With
the Zionist Third World War against Islam now looming
on the horizon, and with the government of America
becoming further divorced from the decentralist and
anti-imperialist inclinations of its people, an
understanding of the history and doctrine of these
movements has become of paramount importance.
THE BLACK FRONT
“’Your racial ideas … are not only a flagrant
contradiction of the great mission of
National-Socialism … they are calculated to bring
about the disintegration of the German people.’
“’What you preach is liberalism[!] … There is only one
possible kind of revolution, and it is not economic,
or political, or social, but racial, and it will
always be the same …”
-- Otto Strasser (first speaker) debating Adolf Hitler
(second speaker), as reported in the article
“Socialists Leave the Nazi Party”, July 4, 1930
Prior to the Nazi’s ascension of power in 1933, there
had been two distinct trends within the German
National-Socialist movement. The first, the “right”
trend in the movement, developed around the alliance
of Herman Goring with the German-Prussian aristocracy
and the captains of German heavy industry. It is to
this camp, lured by the money and the luxuries which
it distributed freely to its political friends, that
Hitler and his toady Goebbels came in the years before
the ascension to power. Opposed to them were the
German socialists, the “left” trend in the movement,
also known as the “Black Front” or the “German Freedom
Front”, who formed around the Strasser brothers, Ernst
Roehm and the SA, and who believed in the
socialization and expropriation of the property of the
aristocrats and industrialists that were supporting
Hitler’s rise to power.
The difference betweens the two camps were not
trivial. The right camp favored socialization –
meaning confiscation into the control of the state –
only of those industries that behaved “against the
interests of the nation”, or, rather, who were owned
by corporations that competed with the Nazi Party’s
backers or that were owned by Jews. The left was in
favor of the socialization – the confiscation and
redistribution to the workers – of all heavy industry
and landed property, whether it was owned by the
Germans who were funding Hitler or any of their
opponents.
The two camps also disagreed on the question of
nationalism and imperialism. Hitler, as early as 1920,
was planning war, in alliance with Britain (he hoped),
against France, for the “domination of Europe”, in
which Germany would control the land and Britain the
seas. Strasser, in contrast, advocated a German
nation, freed of foreign occupation and imperialist
dreams, embracing the German people without colonizing
or occupying the lands of Europe’s non-German people.
Hitler wanted war, and Strasser wanted peace.
Third, the two camps differed significantly on the
role of the state. Hitler’s bourgeois tendencies,
developed from his alliances with Germany’s ruling
class, led him to embrace the essence of fascist
doctrine – the idea of a corporate state that
manufactured the lives of its workers as a product.
The left and working class elements, however,
advocated the liberty of the individual in the
regulation of both their personal and economic lives,
with the belief that, unimpaired by foreign doctrines
and the pollution of ruling class and alien cultural
control, the workers would adhere naturally to the
organic tendencies towards culture that were embodied
in the fundaments of their physical and spiritual
being. Hitler’s Nazi state, with its total control,
was viewed by the Freedom Front opposition in much the
same way that Stalin’s bureaucracy was viewed by the
Trotskyites – as a deformed implementation of the
ideal created by a leadership who had betrayed the
revolution for accommodation with the bourgeoisie.
RADICAL TRADITIONALISM AND HEATHENISM
"Imperialism ... may continue to exist for hundreds or
thousands of years. ... Dead bodies, amorphous and
dispirited masses of men, scrap material from a great
history, are to be taken as the typical symbol of the
end. ... It is not a matter of choice -- it is not the
conscious will of individuals, or even that of whole
classes or peoples that decides. The expansive
tendency is a doom, something daemonic and intense,
which grips, forces into service, and uses up ...
mankind."
-- Oswald Spengler, Decline of the West
As thinkers like Strasser were engaged in the
practical political struggles, others, like Julius
Evola, Oswald Spengler, and, later, Francis Parker
Yockey, were developing the spiritual and
philosophical underpinning of a new
religious-historical movement – a uniquely European
movement that would re-invigorate the European and
Eurasian cultural soul and lead to a renewal of the
European peoples and their civilization.
The idea that underlies this paradigm is that
cultures, civilizations and the nations which embody
them are living organisms like the people which
compose them. Like organisms, these cultural
aggregates have life-cycles, and go through a distinct
series of stages which begin at the birth of the
cultural idea, follow through its development, and
lead to the death of the civilization, culture or
nation when the idea has exhausted its possibilities
for development in the material world. Spengler saw
two distinct phases of this – the first where the
culture exhausts its spiritual and philosophical
possibilities, and a second where it exhausts the
possibilities in technology and empire that the
spiritual foundation has created. Evola took a larger
and essentially religious view – that the entire cycle
of growth and development represented a cycle of
cultural degeneration that was defined by the
domination of different classes – the religious, the
warrior, the merchant, and the worker, in that order –
and which terminated in a death cycle – the Kali Yaga
– and a final destruction – Ragna Rokkr or Armageddon
– which was followed by a rebirth of the Golden Age.
Yockey watered these ideas down by speculating that
such a rebirth could occur outside of the natural
cycle if the will of man was strong enough to
intervene.
Essential to this doctrine is a rejection of both
Christianity and Semitism, which, when not viewed as
the actual agents of cultural destruction, are viewed
as alien cultural ideals who’s influence cannot be
viewed as healthy to the European or Asian cultural
body. Evola saw Judaism and Christianity as being the
means through which the pagan Earth-worship of the
“destructive” cultures had infiltrated the Western
cultural body and introduced into Traditional cultures
(cultures descended from the one race of the Golden
Age which had brought culture to the world) the
intellectualism and materialism which would bring
about their destruction. Spengler often reflected on
how one of the great cultures – the
Mayan/Aztec/Central American – had been destroyed
before reaching the end of its natural life cycle
through the actions of the Western culture and its
colonialism, and Yockey continued this idea of
cultures being killed during their organic development
by asserting that the role of Jews and members of the
Jewish culture in dominating Western cultural
industries and aspects of the Western economy were
killing Western culture before the time that had been
naturally allotted to it. Given this analysis, the
modern Third Positionist doesn't look to Christianity
as the soul of the West, but looks to pre-Christian
religious identity as the key to understanding the
nature of the Western soul.
This does not necessarily mean that the Third
Positionist is motivated by Heathenism, Odinism, or
Asatru -- all variants on pre-Christian Nordic
doctrine. There are really two schools of thought on
this. One is that the Norse, with their warrior spirit
and warrior culture, emobdy the ideal cultural soul of
the Western man. This is an idea largely borrowed from
the mainstream of Hitler-ian National Socialist
thought, and is one that private remarks by Hitler,
recorded by his associates, tend to indicate the
Fuehrer adhered to -- though publicly Hitler was
pro-Christian, and his SS was involved in the cultic
worship of a pseudo-Christian doctrine known as
Irmin-Kristianity (which occultist Karl Maria Willigut
opposed to Judaeo-Christianity). It is also one that
tends to correlate with a more racist worldview that
is not generally held by “beyond left and right"
movements. The second variant sees all of the great
Eurasian cultures -- Mayan, Egyptian, Greco-Roman,
Norse, non-Judaeo-Christian Middle Eastern, Indian and
Chinese -- as being different manifestations of the
same religious and cultural principle, and thus has
respect for all of the pre-Christian Eurasian faiths
as different manifestations of the same culture. Some
Third Positionists would further expand this by saying
that each people has a right to their own religion and
their own culture, and that it is wrong for any
religion or culture, Christianity included, to declare
itself "universal" and attempt to impose its folkways
on another. But regardless of what variant on the
pagan ideal the individual holds, most adherents of
the doctrines are hostile to the Judaeo-Christian way
of life.
HISTORY IN OUR TIME
"America ... has created a 'civilization' that
represents an exact contradiction of the ancient
European tradition. It has introduced the religion of
praxis and productivity; it has put the quest for
profit, great industrial production, and mechanical,
visible, and quantative achievements over any other
interest. It has generated a soulless greatness of a
purely technological and collective nature, lacking
any background of transcendence, inner light, and true
spirituality. America has [built a society where] man
becomes a mere instrument of production and material
productivity within a conformist social conglomerate."
-- Julius Evola, Revolt Against the Modern
World
Much of the recent history of the "beyond left and
right" movement which comprises the modern Third
Position comes from a radical tendency that broke off
the reactionary, far-right, and in modern times
national socialist British National Front organization
in the late 1980s to form the International Third
Position, which then morphed into or absorbed the
National Anarchist movement, the American Front, and a
variety of other organizations which are active today.
The National Front ( http://www.natfront.com) was
founded in 1967 by a merger of the Racial Preservation
Society, the British National Party, and the League of
Empire Loyalists. The group was controversial and
focused largely on anti-immigration activism
throughout the 1970s, with serious opposition from
both Communist and Jewish organizations. In the 1980s,
though, tendencies began to develop within the
National Front that were less hostile to other races
and broader minded on questions of culture and
national identity.
According to ex-National Front member Troy Southgate,
writing on the National-Anarchist mailing list (
http://groups.yahoo.com/national-anarchist):
"By 1984-5, however, the NF had evolved into a
fully-fledged National Revolutionary organisation and
was advocating links with Black separatists like Louis
Farrakhan, support for Libyan-style decentralisation,
dialogue with Osiris Akkebala of the Pan-African
International Movement and Tom Means of the American
Indian Movement, the break-up of the British Isles
into seven independent nations, and even support for
Iran against American imperialism."
But the changes within the group were controversial.
The growing links with non-white organizations
alienated a signficant faction within the Front, which
broke off in 1986 to form a new "National Front" --
the group which represents the core of the modern
National Front organization today. The remainder of
the National Front began moving to Third Position, but
after the leadership of the organization began
apologizing to the Jewish community for
"anti-Semitism" and promised to reform, another split
occurred, and the group calling itself the
"International Third Position" brought. The remaining
action, led by Patrick Harrington, abandoned the name
"National Front" for the name "Third Way", leaving the
1984 splinter as the "official" National Front. Today,
that same splinter confronts many of its ex-leaders,
which left to form the British Nationalist Party (
http://www.bnp.org.uk), in a competition for being the
island's dominant National Socialist movement.
Between 1989 and 1992, the International Third
Position ( http://www.itp.com) began to abandon
socialist doctrines and embrace fascist corporatism as
a political and economic ideology. It allied itself
with groups like Forza Nuova in Italy and the National
Democratic Party in Germany, and established other
branches in Romania, Poland, Scotland, Wales, Mexico,
Cuba, and the United States. It's move towards fascism
disturbed many of its English adherents, though, who
abandoned the group in 1992 to form the English
Nationalist Movement. In 1998, the splinter renamed
itself the National Revolutionary Faction, and began
advocating a form of radical nationalist decentralism
call national anarchism, which derived from the social
nationalist ideas of Otto Strasser.
These splinters and tendencies are not the only
grouplet of active Third Positionist thought, however.
A number of other organizations, some affiliated with
that crowd, some not, have also sprung up. Observers
of leftist politics can think of the British
Nationalist Front as a bit like the American Socialist
Worker's Party -- through its numerous splits it has
produced the vast majority of the radical grouplets in
the Third Position just as the SWP has split to
provide most of America's various Trotskyist
organizations.
Other groups who are loosely affiliated with the
National Revolutionary Faction's international (
http://www.thirdposition.net) include the American
Front and the Russian National Bolshevist Party --
both of whom have received disproportionate attention
in America as being anti-Semitic and far right
organizations. The overtly racist views of the
American Front in particular have become a favorite
talking point of “anti-racist” crusaders seeking to
smear the Third Positionist movement, despite the fact
those views are more an aberration among international
Third Positionism than a fundamental element of the
doctrine. Further, Edward Limonov, who heads the
Russian National Bolshevik Party, has also faced
harassment by the Russian government for various
accusations of “terrorism”.
Another organization which has also been moving
towards a third-positionist national-communist line in
the past few years has been the Communist Party of the
Russian Federation (KPRF). Having been the ruling
party of Russia for so long, and drawing a large base
of its support from ethnic Russians, the KPRF has been
blending nationalistic and communist rhetoric to
create a more populist approach to politics that
closely resembles many Third Positionist ideologies.
This has disturbed a number of Western neo-liberal
"anti-hate" organizations, one of which, the Union of
Jews of the Former Soviet Union, a group funded by a
group controlled by billionaire mogul George Soros,
issued the following statement in a recent press
release:
"The Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF)
is the largest faction in the national parliament, the
State Duma, and the dominant party in many regions.
... [M]any KPRF regional leaders are openly
antisemitic, support antisemitic media (Bryansk,
Oryol), or give direct or indirect support to
antisemitic groups or individuals. ... With the rise
of extremist nationalist ideology in post-Soviet
Russia, a new form of Communist antisemitism has
emerged as some members of the KPRF have begun using
antisemitic rhetoric borrowed from nationalist
extremists to drum up political support. The influence
of the ‘Red-Brown’ alliance within the KPRF is clearly
on the rise."
THE THIRD POSITION AND ISLAM
“Islam, which originated among the Semitic races …
also consisted of the Law and Tradition, regarded as a
formative force, to which the Arab stocks of the
origins provided a purer and nobler human material
that was shaped by a warrior spirit. The Islamic law
(shariah) is a divine law; its foundation, the Koran,
is thought of as God's very own word (kalam Allah) as
well as a nonhuman work and an "uncreated book" that
exists in heaven ab eterno. Although Islam considers
itself the "religion of Abraham” … it is nevertheless
true that (a) it claimed independence from both
Judaism and Christianity; (b) the Kaaba, with its
symbolism of the center, is a pre-Islamic location and
has even older origins that cannot be dated
accurately; (c) in the esoteric Islam tradition, the
main reference point is al-Khadir, a popular figure
conceived as superior to an pre-dating the biblical
prophets (Koran 18:59-81). … In early Islam the only
form of asceticism was action, that is, jihad, or
"holy war"; this type of war, at least theoretically,
should never be interrupted until the full
consolidation of the divine Law has been achieved. …
Finally, Islam presents a traditional completeness,
since the shariah and the sunna, that is, the exoteric
law and tradition, have their complement not in vague
mysticism, but in full-fledged initiatory
organizations (turuq) that are categorized by an
esoteric teaching (tawil) and by the metaphysical
doctrine of the Supreme Identity (tawhid). In these
organizations, and in general in the shia, the
recurrent notions of the masum, of the double
perogative of the isma (doctrinal infallibility), and
of the impossibility of being stained by any sin
(which is the perogative of the leaders, the visible
and invisible Imams and the mujtahid), lead back to
the line of an unbroken race shaped by a tradition at
a higher level than both Judaism and the religious
beliefs that conquered the West.”
-- Julius Evola, Revolt Against The Modern
World
Most interesting in the context of recent events is
the strong links that have developed between the
various organizations in the Third Positionist
movement and the anti-Zionist and national liberation
struggles of the Arab people and the Islamic world. In
the words of the founding documents of the Third
Positionist collective:
“Jewish people have no racial, cultural or historical
claim to the land of Palestine… The so-called state of
‘Israel’ was erected on the murdered corpses of
innocent Arabs, and has been maintained by systematic
state terrorism. We recognize the legitimate
aspirations of the Palestinian people … Peace is a
consequence of justice, and there will be no true
peace in the Middle East until the Palestinians are
given the justice they truly merit. … As a guiding
principal in such matters, we recognize the Arab world
must be supported against the Zionist lobby”
Such strong statements have led to a growing interest
in a variety of radical Palestinian liberation groups,
from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
to the Islamic Association for Palestine. But more
akin to the principles of Third Positionism are the
guiding ideals of Libyan leader Muammar Al Qadhafi’s
Green Revolution, as embodied in his Green Book:
“Political struggle that results in the victory of a
candidate with, for example, 51 per cent of the votes
leads to a dictatorial governing body in the guise of
a false democracy, since 49 per cent of the electorate
is ruled by an instrument of government they did not
vote for, but which has been imposed upon them. Such
is dictatorship…This is the reality of the political
systems prevailing in the world today. They are
dictatorial systems and it is evident that they
falsify genuine democracy.”
Qadhafi’s views are a combination of a critique of
modern democracy combined with a prescription for a
superior form of democracy, based on decentralized
government, worker’s councils, and a “truer”
understanding of democratic principle like freedom of
religion and freedom of the press. His Green Book,
which is claimed to have inspired a number of
decidedly undemocratic revolutions, such as Charles
Taylor’s struggle in Liberia and Fodah Sankoh’s
arm-amputating rebellion in Sierra Leone, is a
prominent feature on many Third Positionist sites, and
supporters of his Jamahiri movement (
http://www.mathaba.com) are often found conversing
with Third Positionist in their groups and mailing
lists.
This collaboration with anti-Zionist elements of all
stripes, and the belief that all people have the right
to their own system of government, even if it is
different from or a rejection of Western ideals – as
long as it does not make imposition on Western ideals
– runs smack in the face of American ruling class
corporate universalism and neo-conservative
imperialism, which demands that all people reduce
themselves to consumers of Western material goods.
This conflict has caused growing protest against Third
Positionism among those elements of the Western ruling
class tasked to the suppression of political dissent,
and has caused some in the traditional Left to begin
laying plans for the destruction of this competitor.
NEO-LIBERAL HATE AND RESISTANCE
“More and more, people on both ends of the traditional
political spectrum … are finding that their world
views overlap. They are opposed to what are seen as
the homogenizing forces of globalism. They despise
capitalism, with its tendency to concentrate wealth
and to make people and economies more and more alike.
… They pine for nations of peasant-like folk tied
closely to the land and to their neighbors. They fight
for a pristine environment, a land unsullied by
corporate agriculture and urbanization. They detest
man-centered philosophies, seeing animals as no less
important than humans. They reject rationalism in
favor of a kind of mystical spirituality. Above all,
these mainly young people -- in some ways, the
descendants of the "back-to-the-land" hippies of the
1960s -- favor decentralization.
“… [T]hese ideas have had a real impact on the
American racist rock scene”
-- Southern Poverty Law Center, “Neither Left Nor
Right”, Intelligence Report
Despite their typically ridiculous non sequitur mode
of thinking, the Southern Poverty Law Center, a group
which turns profits by suing small “far right”
organizations who lack the financial resources to
defend themselves, has been leading the charge to
expand the definition of “hater” and “extremist” to
include not only “Third Positionist” doctrines but
also traditional Trotskyist and Anarchist
left-wingers. In this, they have cooperated with the
ADL and B’nai B’rith, who have press released numerous
concerns of late about “anti-Zionism”, which they
equate with “anti-Semitism”, among the American and
Canadian campus based student left. Both groups,
seeing their usual enemies -- the Ku Klux Klan, David
Duke, the Aryan Nations, and the like -- largely
exhausted financially and with little left to attack,
have been desperately trying to justify their
existence with these ad hominem expansions of the war
on “hatred” – though there is some indication that the
larger world is not buying it. As long time left-wing
anarchist activist P. Milstein wrote in his recent
essay “The Enemy of Our Enemy: The Southern Poverty
Law Center ‘Bad Jackets’ Anarchists”:
“Are anarchists now the allies and recruits for the
latest trend in white neo-fascism? That is the amazing
Big Lie being put out by the Southern Poverty Law
Center (SPLC), on its popular civil rights website.
... This attack on revolutionary anarchism is more
than a simple mistake, more even than just
pro-government propaganda that needs to be shot down.
It's a slipping of the mask, exposing the
contradiction of pro-capitalist ‘anti-racism’ in
America. …
“What kind of ‘anti-racist’ organization would do all
this? The Southern Poverty Law Center itself and its
founder-director, Morris Dees, while a public
relations and fund-raising powerhouse, has for years
been viewed by many activists with misgivings. … It
appears that SPLC is the model of capitalist
"anti-racism"--that is, it functions like a business
with government connections using anti-racism as a
commodity. And far from being a critic of the racist
system, it is a small gear in the machinery of
capitalist hegemony and institutional repression.”
Some though, on the anarchist and traditional ‘left’
have decided they are going to take on the issue of
National Anarchism, Synthesism, and Third Positionism
in Europe on their own, and have launched a
continent-wide conference on the issue for early
January 2002. In her “preliminary call for an
anti-Nationalist-Anarchist, Anti-Synthesis conference”
to be held in Warsaw, Poland, International Workers of
the World (Wobbly) member Laure Akai wrote that she
would be inviting speakers to discuss this “fascist”
[sic] “threat”:
“The conference will be devoted to an exploration of
theories, groups and people associated with the ‘Third
Way’, Nationalist Anarchism, the New Right and others
trying to form a synthesis between left and right
radicalism. We would like to have 7-8 one hour
presentations on different
groups/ideologies/ideologues, some historic background
and also time to discuss strategies and the
publication of a book or journal dedicated to
debunking this phenomenon.”
Since the conference was announced in early August,
however it doesn’t appear to have drawn much interest.
Debates between “left” and “right” anarchism have been
occurring within the anarchist movement for decades,
and few but the most dedicated ideologues have ever
expressed an interest in trying to drive either side
“out” of the movement – regardless of the fact that
neither side has either the ability or the authority
to do so. In a way, Akai’s totalitarian desire to
define for others what political ideologies are
permissible is exactly the kind of ruling class
conformist impulse that the “beyond left and right”
movement is attempting to address.
Southgate, one of the targets of the conference,
seemed very unconcerned about it, and when asked for
information, said that he wasn’t even sure the
conference had drawn enough attention to continue:
“Information is pretty hard to come by! All we had was
a lone message on the Anti-National Anarchist list …”
he told Pravda.
CONCLUSIONS
As anti-globalist and anti-capitalist sentiments
spread among all people, left and right, who are
opposed to the internationalist’s New World Order and
their anti-working class imperialism, it is inevitable
that divergent tendencies, united by a common
opposition, will find themselves engaging in greater
exchanges of political and cultural ideas, and that
this exchange will lead to a new synthesis ofdoctrines
which will redefine the paradigm in which social and
economic struggle is conducted in the 21st Century.
Key to this is the role played by the so-called “Third
Positionist” movement which, by rejecting Capitalism,
Communism, Social Democracy and Hiterlian National
Socialism, seeks to find a true working people’s
socialism that accommodates unique cultural and ethnic
characters while not ending support to imperialism,
ethnic supremacy, or world-destroying wars.
Standing in stark contrast to this are the movements
of the international ruling class, whether the
American Oil Barons, the Zionists, or the New World
Order “democratic” socialists, which seek to strip
working people of their political and economic
liberties in order to shape them in the image of the
“new man”. These movements, which demand as part of
their doctrine global domination and the destruction
of all cultures and traditions which oppose them, have
created by their evil deeds the reaction that will
stand in the way of their phony “progress” and bring
their system to its knees. Working people today, just
as the working people of a century ago, have no use
for wars that bring profit to a handful of elite at
the expense of the lives of the masses, and as working
people see how the ideologies of the past failed to
bring about their enlightenment, they are seeking out
news ideas in a new field of politics that has moved
“beyond left and right.”
=====
http://diypages.dhs.org/adri/earth.html
http://educate-yourself.org/currentnews.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/agentsmiley/message/2
http://www.hyperworx.com/~joanna/kabul.jpg
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=82758&group=webcast
http://educate-yourself.org/nwonewsindex.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Cobra Gas Powered Scooter. Top speed exceeds 25 mph.
Originally $599.95.
Now $399.95 at Youcansave.com.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/K11sED/OkNDAA/ySSFAA/xRZolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds
are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and
'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-directions and outright frauds—is
used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout
the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust
denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
Om
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
