-Caveat Lector-

http://www.copvcia.com/stories/dec_2001/death_profits_pt1.html

PROFITS OF DEATH -- INSIDER TRADING AND 9-11

by

Tom Flocco – Edited by Michael C. Ruppert

[© Copyright 2001. From The Wilderness Publications,
www.copvcia.com. All Rights Reserved. May be recopied,
distributed or posted on the worldwide web for
non-profit purposes only.]

 FTW, December 6, 2001 -- On October 9th, FTW broke a
story on insider trading connected to the 9-11 attacks
on the World Trade Center that sparked worldwide
controversy. In that story we reported how the Israeli
Herzliyya Institute for Counterterrorism had
documented that unknown individuals -- with accurate
foreknowledge of the attacks -- had purchased an
obvious and unusually large number of “put” options on
United and American Airlines shortly before the
attacks.

 Additional companies hit hard by the insider trading
included Axa Re(insurance) and Munich Re as well as
American investment giants Merrill Lynch and Morgan
Stanley.

 Put options are essentially a bet that a stock’s
price will fall abruptly. The seller, having entered
into a time-specific contract with a buyer, does not
need to own the actual shares at the time the contract
is purchased. Therefore, if a holder of the put option
has a contract to sell a stock such as American
Airlines for (e.g.) $100 a share on a Friday and the
stock falls to $50 on Wednesday, they can purchase the
stock, sell it on Friday and double their money. The
person on the other end of the contract (the call) has
an obligation to buy the shares at the agreed upon
price. The bank handling the transaction as a broker
is the only entity knowing the identities of both
parties.

 FTW also revealed that the A.B. Brown (Alex Brown)
investment arm of the banking giant Deutschebank/A.B.
Brown had been headed until 1998 by the man who is now
the Executive Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency – A.B. “Buzzy” Krongard. In fact, Krongard is
but one name in a long history of CIA interconnections
to stock trading and the world’s financial markets. We
also discussed, in detail, the evidence indicating
that the CIA and other intelligence agencies monitor
stock trading in real time for the purpose of
identifying potential attacks of any nature that might
damage the U.S. economy.

 The original FTW story is located at:


http://www.copvcia.com/stories/oct_2001/krongard.html.

 Critics of FTW’s initial story - not having read any
of five related stories dating back to an October 2000
piece on PROMIS software - claimed that we had not
made the links to establish culpability. But we knew
that the links were there, that our case was solid,
and that new evidence would not go undiscovered for
long.

 Now, investigative reporter Tom Flocco digs deep and
strikes pay dirt in a three-part series that reveals
not only deeper links between the CIA, Wall Street and
the insider trades of 9-11, but also discloses that a
key executive at Deutschebank – an American – became,
just weeks before the attacks, a convicted felon. His
crime: conspiracy to launder drug money to arrange the
purchase of U.S. weapons – in association with two
Pakistanis who also attempted to acquire nuclear bomb
components – for use by Islamic fundamentalist
terrorists. – MCR

 CIA Does Not Deny Stock Monitoring Outside U.S.

(Part I in a series)

 In a returned phone call from the Central
Intelligence Agency, press spokesman Tom Crispell
denied that the CIA was monitoring "real-time,"
pre-September 11, stock option trading activity within
United States borders using such software as the
Prosecutor‘s Management Information System (PROMIS).


 "That would be illegal.  We only operate outside the
United States," the intelligence official said.

 However, when asked whether the CIA had been using
PROMIS beyond American borders to scrutinize world
financial markets for national security purposes,
Crispell replied, "I have no way of knowing what
operations are [being affected by our assets] outside
the country."

 Extensive media reporting confirms that investors at
Deutschebank-Alex Brown and other global financial
entities may have profited from prior knowledge of the
attacks while purchasing disproportionate pre-attack
put option contracts on targeted U.S. airlines and
related insurance or investment firms. All of these
firms suffered serious losses resulting from the
September 11th attacks and their stocks abruptly
plummeted.

 Confirmation that the CIA or other U.S. intelligence
agencies were monitoring financial markets and had
seen these trades before the attacks would have
staggering implications for thousands of victims’
families.

 The CIA official also declined to comment on the
actual capabilities of PROMIS.  The highly technical
software has been described as a system that
"interfaces with any database...as police can input an
alleged terrorist’s name or credit card, and the
software will provide details of the person’s
movements through purchases...," according to an
11-10-01 Toronto Sun report.

 The importance of PROMIS is that it is not only
capable of interfacing with a wide variety of data
bases in different computer languages and then
integrating the data, but it has also been modified
for intelligence purposes. It has then been sold
throughout the world by spy agencies through third
parties to clients such as banks and investment houses
envious of its unique capabilities. One key
modification by agencies such as the CIA and Mossad –
not disclosed to most users -- is a secret “back door”
that permits those with the right codes to enter
databases undetected, retrieve and/or alter
information, and leave without a trace. PROMIS has
been extensively reported as being used throughout the
world’s financial markets because of its versatility
in facilitating international transactions.

 Further clouding the issue of pre-attack stock
screening by U.S. intelligence, the Canadian daily
revealed that U.S. police said many of the suspected
terrorists were apprehended (and detained) "through
use of the state-of-the-art computer software program
PROMIS."

 In March 2000, CIA director George J. Tenet told the
Senate that Osama bin Laden’s group (Al Q’aeda) was
"embracing the opportunities offered by recent leaps
in information technology." A FOX News story and
stories in FTW disclosed in November that Osama bin
Laden was believed to have the software.

 The issue of CIA monitoring of stock trades follows
on the heels of wide reports indicating that
investigators are carefully probing the insider
trading with its resultant profits, reported to be in
the 10’s of millions of dollars -- some of which a
Deutschebank investor has yet to claim.

 A promis is a promis

 Crispell also declined comment when asked whether the
Treasury Department or FBI had questioned CIA
Executive Director and former Deutschebank-Alex Brown
CEO, A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, about CIA monitoring of
financial markets using PROMIS and his former position
as overseer of Brown’s "private client” relations.
[Note: Krongard stayed with A.B. Brown to head
“private client” operations after it was acquired by
Banker’s Trust in 1997. As Krongard was leaving in
1998 to join the CIA as counselor to Director George
Tenet, Banker’s Trust was acquired by Deutschebank.
Banker’s Trust had been previously criticized by the
U.S. Senate and regulators for money laundering.
Krongard was promoted to Executive Director at CIA in
March 2001. - MCR]

 Wide reports -- including a 9/28/01 story in the
Asian Wall Street Journal and a 10/1/01 story in The
Guardian -- indicate that investigators are checking
Deutschebank’s alleged links to Saudi "private
banking," terrorist bank accounts, and $2.5 million in
unclaimed United Airlines (UAL) put options profits;
however, no government acknowledgement had ever been
given of CIA’s alleged use of PROMIS software prior to
the attacks.

 In a recent phone conversation, when asked about
alleged terrorist ties to Deutschebank and potential
pre-attack CIA trade monitoring via PROMIS, Treasury
Department spokesman Rob Nichols remarked, "This is
clearly an interesting line of questioning regarding
conflicts of interest."

 However, news searches indicate that no member of
Congress has publicly questioned whether wealthy
terrorist-connected Saudi nationals participated in
the private client operations of Deutschebank-Alex
Brown. Osama bin Laden and almost all of the alleged
9-11 hijackers are of Saudi nationality. Also, no
member of Congress expressed public interest in asking
Krongard about whether or not the CIA affected
"real-time" pre-attack trade monitoring using PROMIS
software at any location.

 [Note: Under a program known as Echelon, the
governments of the U.S., Britain, Canada, Australia
and New Zealand routinely circumvent prohibitions on
domestic electronic spying by having the agencies of
the other governments do it for them. - MCR]

 Michael Ruppert, editor and publisher of From The
Wilderness (FTW) newsletter (www.copvcia.com), has
been interviewed by both the House and Senate for his
expertise on illegal covert CIA operations. He said
recently that, "It is well documented that the CIA has
long monitored such (suspicious or unusual) trades --
in real time -- as potential warnings of terrorist
attacks and other economic moves contrary to U.S.
interests."

 Ruppert was the first to point out after 9-11 that
CIA Executive Director Buzzy Krongard has extensive
past ties to Deutschebank-Alex Brown.  Ruppert added,
"There is abundant and clear evidence that a number of
transactions in financial markets indicated specific
[criminal] foreknowledge of the September 11
attacks...and the firm which was used to place put
options on UAL stock was, until 1998, managed by the
man who is now in the number three position at the
CIA."

 Ruppert also confirmed that two October 17 calls to
the FBI resulted in spokespersons declining to give
their names after revealing that "the FBI has
discontinued use of the PROMIS software." Moreover, on
October 24, Justice Department spokesperson Loren
Pfeifle declined to answer any questions about where,
when, or how PROMIS had been used and would only say,
"I can confirm that the DOJ has discontinued use of
the program." This followed almost 17 years of denials
by the FBI and the Department of Justice -- in court
and under oath -- that they used the software at all
in a law enforcement or intelligence capacity.

 Krongard’s current lofty intelligence community
position, combined with his prior leadership of a
financial institution allegedly connected to terrorist
hijacker bank accounts [see Part II], suspicious UAL
options contracts, and "private banking" is so
controversial that it has not as yet sparked any
official investigation. That said, the evidence is
substantial enough to potentially expose the
prior-knowledge issue -- if Congress chooses to act.

 And while Treasury Department official Rob Nichols
agreed that unresolved conflict of interest questions
remain, the CIA Executive Director is still currently
charged with supervision of the U.S. intelligence
investigation of his former firm and its "private
banking" operations.

 Reuters has reported that Krongard "was [also]
involved in setting up the CIA experiment into
investing in high-tech companies with the goal of
acquiring innovative technology for its own use."

 Commenting on the CIA’s venture capital firm
In-Q-Tel, started in 1999 to encourage development of
private-sector technologies for use in the
intelligence world, Krongard said on August 1, 2001 --
just 5 weeks before the Trade Center attacks -- "I
think In-Q-Tel’s a wonderful model...in accessing the
capabilities of the private sector."

 On October 16, Fox News reported that, according to
sources, accused Russian spy and FBI agent Robert
Hanssen sold high-tech PROMIS software to Russia, and
that Osama bin Laden allegedly purchased it from
Russian organized crime sources.

 Fox reported that, "Government officials suspect bin
Laden may have the highly sophisticated U.S.
government software that has been used by several
other governments, including the United States, for
classified intelligence and law enforcement
information."

 The admission by U.S. government officials that
PROMIS was widely used by a number of governments
further blurs the pre-attack stock monitoring issue
since intelligence officials will likely continue to
decline comment, save for closed-door congressional
oversight hearings or challenges by those victims’
families choosing to bypass settlements adjudicated by
the Attorney General’s office in favor of direct
intervention by the courts.

 The buck stops where?

 Tom Crispell, the CIA official, was cooperative while
attempting to maintain intelligence confidentiality in
the face of what he termed as "ongoing investigations
surrounding the Twin Towers tragedies by the CIA, FBI,
Justice, and Treasury Departments." However, this was
in great contrast to an FBI spokesperson who refused
to offer either his first or last name, while
declining comment on any matter related to events of
September 11.

 During a series of calls, some spokespersons quickly
attempted to defer and deflect questions to another
government agency, i.e. "We don’t deal with that
issue. Call the other [entity]."

 However, many would agree, given the evidence, that
the 9-11 terrorism is closely linked to economic
issues. President Bush has stated that this is
“economic warfare.” Yet few appear to be questioning
an apparent paucity of critical information sharing
among key government agencies on the issue.

 As U.S. investigators retrace the financial trails
connecting the Twin Towers, terrorist hijackers and
their accomplices, many of whom may still be in the
country, evidence is being turned up by FBI, CIA,
Justice, Treasury and NSA that does involve global
banking conglomerate Deutschebank-Alex Brown.

 $2.5 million unclaimed UAL investor profits

 For example, according to a 10-19-2001 Wall Street
Journal report, an unnamed investor purchased 2,000
United Airlines (UAL) put option contracts through
Deutsche Bank-Alex Brown on September 6 -- betting the
stock would shortly plummet.  And USA Today reported
that an individual purchased 810 UAL puts on August 6.

 A Baron’s source claimed on 10-8-2001 that the
pre-attack UAL order placed through Deutsche Bank was
for 2,500 contracts which were "split into 500 chunks
each, directing each order to different U.S. exchanges
around the country simultaneously."

 According to San Francisco Chronicle reporters
Christian Berthelsen and Scott Winokur a source
familiar with the UAL trades said investors have yet
to claim $2.5 million in profits on contracts
purchased before United airliners crashed into a New
York Trade Tower and a deserted Pennsylvania field on
September 11.

 The Chronicle source also identified
Deutschebank-Alex Brown as the investment firm used to
purchase some of the UAL options; and Rohini Pragasam,
a bank spokeswoman, declined to comment on the
transaction.

 The source (who requested anonymity) said, "Usually,
if someone has a windfall like that, you take the
money and run.  Whoever did this thought the Exchange
[NYSE] would not be closed for four days. This smells
real bad."

 The German news weekly Der Spiegel revealed that
Deutschebank also handled accounts worth about $100
million for Osama bin Laden's family. These were part
of 10 accounts it suspected were linked to terrorists
or terrorist activities and which it later handed over
to German authorities after the attacks, according to
a report in Britain’s The Guardian. But no further
comments have been forthcoming from the financial
giant.

 German Central Bank President Ernst Welteke said a
study -- concerning principal hijack subjects residing
in Germany and unusual patterns in short-selling of
insurance, airline and other financial company shares
-- pointed to "terrorism insider trading" in those
stocks.

 The SEC Is Investigating

 A phone interview with Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) press spokesman John Nester, of the
Washington, DC office, revealed that the Commission,
“has already forwarded a general request to
Deutschebank-Alex Brown and other investment firms for
unspecified information related to the suspicious put
option contracts placed prior to the attacks on the
Trade Towers and the Pentagon." But the spokesman
declined comment regarding the identities of complying
banks or the contents of any information obtained.

 Nester augmented his response by adding that
"according to SEC Associate Director of Enforcement
Bill Baker -- who just spoke on a panel outside New
York last week -- our SEC probe is much broader than
investigations made by countries in Europe (who also
lost citizens), many of whom have already closed their
financial investigations of investment banks like
Deutschebank." No results of those probes have been
made public.

 While the SEC media director said "the investigation
is still ongoing with no current conclusions," Nester
(speaking for the SEC), had difficulty explaining the
job description of current New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) Executive Vice President for Enforcement, David
P. Doherty. He would only say that the NYSE "regulates
itself as an SRO or self-regulating organization...."
This vague answer is all the more provocative because
Doherty is a retired General Counsel of the Central
Intelligence Agency.

 Nester added, "The SEC has oversight responsibility
regarding the NYSE, and we are also working with
Justice, Treasury, and the FBI, having set up
professional point men at each firm we are looking at
-- so we don‘t have to reinvent the wheel every time
we call a company [related to the attacks] to get an
answer to a question."

 The "reinvent the wheel" statement raised an eyebrow
regarding the level of corporate cooperation in the
investigation, although Nester declined to add further
comment.

 In Spite of CIA Ties the NYSE Is Little Help

 When asked about the status of the investigation into
the disproportionate pre-attack stock option trades
involving United and American Airlines, Merrill Lynch,
Marsh and McLennan Insurance, Morgan Stanley,
Citigroup, Bear Stearns, and American Express, etc. --
all icons of American capitalism -- NYSE
Communications Director Ray Pellecchia said, "We don't
even confirm that there is an ongoing investigation."

 "We report to the SEC as a matter of course,"
Pellecchia added. But after being referred to as a
"persistent piece of work," this writer asked
Pellecchia to discuss Doherty’s role in the
investigations.  He said, "We stand by this
statement."

 And after pressing for information about what the
NYSE is actually doing to investigate the suspicious
trades on behalf of thousands of victims’ families who
may be concerned about the "prior-knowledge" issue,
Pellecchia still declined to confirm that Doherty's
enforcement office had even sent a report to the SEC.

 When asked why so many former key CIA executives
currently hold, or have held in the past, top level
executive management positions connected in some way
to the stock market via either the SEC, NYSE, or other
investment banking entities, Pellecchia replied
tersely, "I am quite aware of Mr. Doherty's background
and experience."

 Pellecchia also declined to discuss anything related
to current CIA Executive Director A.B. "Buzzy"
Krongard and his past relationship with Alex Brown.

 Expecting Miracles?

 Questions remain as to who will ultimately take
center stage in investigating conflicts of interest or
the real-time monitoring of world financial markets by
U.S. intelligence entities to protect national
security; let alone terrorist ties to wealthy Saudi
private clients at global financial institutions
having direct access (via correspondent banking
relationships) to U.S. banks.

 For while thousands of American families, victimized
by terrorism, still remain numb with grief,
information is being advanced daily regarding what
could be described by some as casual, if not
negligent, long-term, slipshod governmental
responsiveness to fundamental internal national
security and safety questions -- or worse.

 Tom Flocco is a freelance writer and researcher.
(email: [EMAIL PROTECTED])



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to