[CTRL] is terrorism the core of zionism?

[eric stewart]

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.ummah.net/unity/palestine/history/history2.htm

Terrorism is the core of Zionism
Dr. Moh'd N. Al-Khawaldeh

The use of terrorism by the Zionists, is not a reactionary policy,
nor is it used casually, rather it is an integral element of the
Zionist State. Furthermore the State sees it as being essential to
develop and preserve this element of terrorism. The strong
relationship between Zionism and terrorism could be linked to the
imperialist nature of both the ideological and political parties,
which supported the Zionist movement.

The Permanent Characteristics

In order for a Jewish State to be established, it was essential to
carry out a policy of constant persecution and terrorism against
the natives of land, the Palestinians. It was impossible for the
Zionists to achieve their goals without carrying out a policy of
racial discrimination against the Arabs. Thus, with regards to this
policy at least, it became irrelevant who the political allies of
the State were, as this policy was deemed essential to the
existence of the State and was not a negotiable aspect of any
alliance. The racist nature of Zionism, is an innate characteristic
of this political movement, whose basis is the belief that the Jews
are "God's chosen people".

The nature of Zionism, together with the ideological persuasions of
its political allies, has ensured that the State of Israel has
become a military fort, to defend the interests of the imperial
powers, in the developing countries of the Near and Middle East.

It is noticeable that Zionism prospered in the mid 1880s when
imperialism began advocating the use of racist terms, such as the
'white' man, as well as imposing the so-called 'Western wisdom' on
the illiterate people of the East. The Zionist invasion of
Palestine was the product of imperialist Europe's invasion of three
continents, and it was justified to the world with the theological
argument that Palestine was the "Promised Land" of the Jews. Thus,
Zionism is a manifestation of colonial imperialism and is based on
both race and religion; to be more exact, it is based on a
theological claim which states that the land of Palestine is the
land which God has promised to the 'Chosen People'. The concept of
a 'Chosen People' emphasizes the superiority of the Jews, who
should not socialize with other peoples or share the land with any
others. Naturally, this has resulted in a racial closure for the
Jews, discrimination against all other races, especially the Arabs,
who were the original inhabitants of Palestine, as well as an
innate sense of superiority amongst the Jewish race. The policy of
racial closure is seen as a necessity in order to gather the Jewish
people in the diaspora under a central authority, thus the world is
divided into Jewish and non-Jewish. Without such a policy of racial
closure for the Jews, the Jewish people would be scattered
throughout the world, thus making it difficult to establish a
State, which represents the Jewish 'nation'. Thus the Zionist State
of Israel is the only home for all the Jews.

The Comprehensive Closure

All the Zionist leaders have emphasized the idea of a comprehensive
closure. One of the main threats to the Jewish people is perceived
as being a dilution of Judaism, through interaction with other
societies and cultures. In other words, the Jews may leave their
own people and socialize with the other societies, as a result of
which they will lose their own identity. Moreover, the idea of a
comprehensive closure was conducive to the establishment of the
Zionist State. Thus, we can see two reasons why the idea of a
Jewish closure was ardently adopted by the Zionists. First, to
preserve the existence of the Jewish 'nation' and to make this a
worldwide issue. Secondly, to make the Jews into a distinguished
and chosen people, with their own peculiar traditions and customs.
To this end, it is even forbidden for a Jewish woman to marry a
non-Jewish man-to do so is considered a national and religious
betrayal that must be punished.

The objective behind the racial closure in the Zionist ideology is
to achieve a pure and superior race. As a result, introversion is
considered a virtue and isolation is a ritual. Thus, for the Jews,
the idea of the 'Ghetto' is a positive one, in that it does not
only show that the Jews are being rejected by the society, which
they see as good, but it is a sign of achievement for the Jews. To
explain this, we must understand that for a Jew to be a Jew, in the
eyes of Zionism, he must refuse to deal with the rest of the human
race and work to achieve a comprehensive racial closure by
convincing all Jews to move from the diaspora to the Promised Land.
This in turn necessitates the forced exile of the indigenous
population-the Palestinians-from the land, and the forced return of
all Jews to the Jewish homeland. Consequently, the racial closure
is a means to preserve the superiority and racial purity of the
Jews through the means of a State.

There are obvious differences between Zionism and the other forms
of colonial imperialism or classical imperialism. The latter, while
emphasizing the superiority of the Europeans, especially the
'whites' who alone are fit to be master, they still require the
preservation of the native population, albeit in a subservient
role. Zionism, however, requires that all the native population
must be exiled, thus leaving the land entirely for the Jews. Such a
belief makes the use of terrorism and persecution against the
Palestinians, especially those who resist, a necessity. This belief
has taken on other dimensions, which have never before been
witnessed, even under the Apartheid governments of South Africa and
Rhodesia. Zionism rejects the use of internal suppression, but
rather it depends on the use of deportation. Zionism is colonial
imperialism on the one hand and racial colonial imperialism on the
other; as a result, it exploits the resources of the land it
occupies and it also deports the natives.

The racist nature of Zionism existed prior to the invasion of
Palestine; as a result, the isolation of the Jews from the Arabs
was well planned. This is evidenced by the relatively immediate
establishment of the Zionist unions and the application of the
Hebraic labour laws, as well as the boycotting of Arabic goods and
manpower, via various establishments, such as the Zionist Agency,
the National Jewish Fund, the Corporation of Palestine Fund and the
Jewish Labour Union. During the preparation for the establishment
of the Zionist State, the Zionists moved from boycott to
deportation, and from co-existence to the idea of a pure Jewish
State. In 1895, Hertzl said, "We should force the natives to leave
their homeland…by depriving them of labour"(1); this was further
emphasized by Wiseman in 1919, when he was dreaming of a real
Jewish State, "as Jewish as England is English" (2). This statement
by Wiseman, carries all the characteristics of Fascism, as the
Jewish State does not only consider the deportation of the natives
to be an absolute necessity, but it is also deemed vital that all
memory of the Palestinians be eradicated as well. To this end, all
the historical and architectural achievements of the Palestinians,
throughout their long history, have to be concealed or destroyed.

Throughout its history Zionism has depended on the means of
terrorism, deportation and predation to achieve its objectives; in
this respect, Zionism can be equated with Naziism. Fascist theories
have been brought to life with the Zionist practices against the
Palestinians; for example, the Zionists have put into practice the
idea propagated by Hitler of the "Ultimate Solution", which was the
execution of the rivals of the Nazi ideology without trial. Hitler
also believed in the superiority of the Arian race, and he
committed many atrocities in order to make Germany into a pure
country, inhabited only by the pure Arian race. Similarly, the
Zionists are trying make Palestine into a country without Arabs, so
that it will become the Promised Land for God's Chosen People-the
Jews.

Over the years, the Palestinians have consistently frustrated the
Zionist dreams and plans through their long fight against the
occupation. They have been able to achieve this because many of
them have remained on their native land, despite the objections of
the Jews. The Zionists have responded with the policy of "the
security regions", which have been applied to 90% of the
Palestinian community within the new State. This term is a polite
expression for the martial law which is applied upon the
Palestinians, and justified by the so-called 'security threat' of
the Palestinians to the State of Israel. As a result, the occupied
territories are ruled by a division of military officers, who apply
the laws of war and defence, at the military courts. This situation
makes it very difficult for the Palestinians to move freely; in
addition, it suppresses cultural activities, deprives the
Palestinians of the right to a university education and prevents
equal pay for the workers who have low-standard jobs. It also
confiscates the land under the pretext of public benefit and
prevents the Palestinians from taking up any government positions.
This situation is similar to the so-called "Bantus" in South
Africa, before the time of Mandella. Accordingly, the Israeli
society has been divided into two groups; the first group, the
Jews, are ruled by the laws of democracy, while the other group,
the Arabs, are ruled by force and persecution, which is clear
evidence of the rampant racial discrimination practised by the
Zionists(3).

>From the time the theory of Zionism was invented, the Zionists' use
of terrorism has been organized and consistent. The adaptability of
the policy of terrorism by the Zionists to the changing conditions
within the State, as well as its prolonged use, makes it impossible
for Zionism to establish the pure Jewish State without practicing
terrorism. The policies of terrorism and deportation, as used by
the Zionists and which have indeed become an innate aspect of this
political movement, can only provoke the Palestinians to continue
their fight as long as the Zionist State exists. Naturally, then,
the Palestinian resistance has grown parallel to the Zionists use
of terrorism, especially regarding internal matters. This situation
can only be stopped by stronger forces, as otherwise it will grow
endlessly, at the same time becoming more dangerous and more
extreme, although there will come a time when it will be destroyed
altogether. Thus, terrorism is an organic constituent of Zionism;
it reveals the illusions of this system and works against the final
solution to the Palestine question.

The Elements of Terrorism in the Zionist Ideology

1. Ignoring the Palestinians
Zionism does not recognize the existence of the Palestinians;
indeed, their existence goes against the Zionist objectives. Thus,
it is doing its best to destroy and cancel the Palestinian identity
in order to prove that it does not exist; to this end, the
Palestinians are uprooted, deported or banished from wherever they
live. Zionism only recognizes the Palestinian when he lives outside
his homeland and has no Palestinian identity; this idea was
emphasized by Hertzl in his dairy when he wrote, "We try to deport
the natives to the neighbouring countries and give them jobs so
that they will not come back to our land (4)." Hence, the Zionist
ideology, which does not generally recognize the existence of the
Palestinian people, will do so when it is convenient. In this
respect, they will help them get jobs outside the State, as this
will eradicate them from the State of Israel. This policy of
selective recognition was emphasized by Hertzl when he said, "If I
find wild animals in the land we move into, I will use the natives
to get rid of the animals before I find them jobs in other
countries (5)." So, although, as a rule, the Palestinian should
generally be destroyed, one way or another, because the Zionist
philosophy teaches that he is not a 'normal' human being, he can,
however, be seen to exist when it is necessary to use him for some
purpose, which would be degrading for the superior race of the
Jews. In this case, he is seen as a primitive animal, which in
itself has the same effect of depriving the Palestinian of any real
recognition as a human being. This policy of seeing the
Palestinians as a non-entity was summed up by Balfour when he said,
"We do not have to consult the natives of Palestine or even know
their desires (6)."

Hertzl's belief was that the primitive Palestinian should be
destroyed; this ideology was adopted by Hertzl because of the
scientifically debated differences between the existing human
species and the supposed struggle between the primitive and the
civilized. This led to the belief that in order to protect and
serve civilization, primitivism must be destroyed. Under such a
philosophy, Zionism found the pretext to kill in the name of God
civilization and self-interests. The most serious point here is
that under this belief, murder is considered a marginal crime, a
necessity in order to get rid of the Palestinians. This was
emphasized by Golda Me'eir when she said, "There is no such term as
'Palestinians'; they do not exist (7)." Such disregard
automatically nullifies the concepts of murder, conviction and
punishment in relation to actions taken against the Palestinians.
Zionism banishes the Palestinians from the realm of humanity in
order to justify its deeds, and considers murder as a preventive
measure to be taken against strange and harmful creatures. As Begin
once said, "Palestinians are just cockroaches which should be
crushed (8)." Moreover, Zionism considers the evacuation of the
Palestinian cities and villages as a sanitation process, to clear
these places of odious 'insects'. It exterminates by force whatever
is considered harmful to the civilized human being, and thus the
conflict between the two forces begins. As Begin says, "We should
recognize that there is not room for two peoples on this land; the
only solution is to have a Palestine without Arabs, who must be
deported to the neighbouring countries and their tribes should be
dispersed." The words used by Begin reflect various Zionist
concepts. For example, the use of the word deportation shows the
belief that it is impossible to have any co-existence between the
Jews and the Arabs, rather that those who are to be deported should
be punished severely, because they are undesirables and deserve
punishment and persecution. The phrase "there is no room for two
peoples on this land" is evidence of the belief that there will be
a constant struggle for survival between the two sides until one
side overcomes and banishes the other. This need to banish
justifies all the necessary means, such as psychological pressure,
terrorism and cold-blooded murder, all of which are characteristic
of the Arab-Zionist conflict.

The theory that there is a constant struggle that controls the
Arab-Zionist conflict is also adopted by Yousuf Wateez, who wrote
in his dairies on 19 December 1940, "There is no place for two
peoples on this land; the Arabs must be moved to the neighbouring
countries (9)." In reality, this means that the Arabs will be given
no regard and will be humiliated because although in general the
word "move" means to move naturally and freely, here it means to
deport the Palestinians from their homeland by force and place them
in the neighbouring countries, which are given little choice but to
host them. This process firmly divides the Jews and Arabs, the
dominant race being the Jews, who consciously plan and order, and
the subservient race being the Arabs, who obey.

One of the present purposes of the Zionist ideology is to play the
game of "the face and the mask", which conceals terrorism under the
pretext of civilization, murder under the Old Testament, and
deportation as movement. This game has always been practiced in
theory, but it has become a practical reality after the
establishment of the Zionist State, whose ideology is very similar
to the ruthless regimes of the apartheid governments of South
Africa, Chile and El-Salvador.

We can thus see the flawed nature of this game; the Zionist State
does not represent civilization, rather it stands for all the
shortcomings of Fascism, Naziism and Imperialism. This is
emphasized by Yousuf Wateez when he says, "There is no salvation
for us unless we evacuate the land by deporting the natives and
housing them in the neighbouring countries (10)." The author uses
the humane term "salvation", which indicates that there is an act
of saving someone or of being saved, yet the author clearly shows
that this act of salvation for the Jews can only be achieved at the
expense of the Arabs, that the rights of one can only be achieved
by a denial of the rights of another. This inverted concept, which
is propagated with such obstinacy, reveals the false concept of
salvation under the Zionist ideology. This racial, narrow-minded,
egoistic ideology, does not know the real way of salvation, rather
this form of salvation will only lead to the destruction of other
peoples. The real concepts of salvation, happiness, freedom and
independence are irretrievably bound up with the idea of justice.
Nevertheless, the Zionist ideology has denied the Palestinian his
rights of land, humanity and history throughout the ages. Indeed,
the Israeli ex-Minister of Education, Haroun Yadlin said in 1974,
"It is quite important for the young to know that we did not find
any nation when we came back to this country (11)." Thus, the young
have been deliberately misinformed, so as to ensure the
continuation of the State. The minister used the term "nation"
because he could not deny the existence of the people; it was
clearly his intention to try and deal with this issue
theoretically, by comparing it to the foreign hegemony as practised
among others-the Ottomans and the British. However, the idea of the
'nation' has been confused with the idea of the 'State'. The fact
that there was no independent State does not mean that there was no
nation; in this respect, the issue of the Palestinian question does
not only concern the Palestinians, but all the third world
countries.

The modern nations of the world have been formed after undergoing a
severe struggle with the imperialist nations. They became nations
because they possessed the necessary qualities of any nation, such
as land, history, language and traditions. The use of the word
'nation' by Yadlin is interesting, because under the
internationally recognized definition of a nation, there is no such
thing as a Jewish 'nation', as prior to 1948 they did not have
land, nor was there a universal language or universal traditions.
On the other hand, there was a Palestinian 'nation' under this
definition, thus Yadlin has used the term to suit his own
objective, which is to ignore the existence of the Palestinian
nation. The use of the argument that there was not a Palestinian
nation, while there was a legitimate Jewish nation, is a mere false
justification for the hostile attitude taken by the Jews against
the Arabs; after all, if there was no nation, they have no right to
be there. The continual repetition of this argument has turned it
into a reality for many people (12). The first Minister of
Education, the founder of Israel, and the university professor,
Benzion Denola, said in the introduction to his book, The History
of Hagana, that "There is no place for the Arabs in our land, and
we will tell them to leave; if they resist, we will deport them by
force." Moreover, Joseph Me'eir, the director of the settlements in
the Zionist Agency, wrote in June 1967, "It has become obvious that
there is no room for two peoples in this land, and the only
solution is to establish Israel west of Jordan, without the Arabs,
who must be moved to the neighbouring countries." The terms "move"
and "neighbouring countries", in reality, suggest that there will
be a continual fight against the Palestinians in order to force
them to accept the Zionist laws and hence make the Zionists the
dominant race.

2. The Promotion of Hostility through Education
Aggression in the Zionist ideology is not restricted to physical
attacks against the Palestinians; it also encompasses a
non-physical or mental aspect. This is achieved through a
comprehensive and systematic education of the students, the
soldiers and the rabbis, using similar methods to those of Fascism
and Naziism. Indeed, education is considered as one of the best
ways to promote hostility against the Palestinians at all levels.
For instance, Jabutensky says, "I have spoiled your sons, and
taught them how to destroy the system (the glass of the windows),
and I tried to teach them that real education is not about how to
read, but about how to fire, and I did not harm them. I hope to be
honoured and to be able to continue this (work) as a writer and a
guide, as long as I am alive (13)." Apparently, then, the role of a
writer is to murder and to teach about murder; the writer is the
bullet, and the reader is the gunman. Their job is to find the
innocent and naïve in the schools and turn them into rebels, who
are prepared not only to break the glass of the windows, but also
to use the gun. Thus, rebellion becomes terrorism, which seeks the
utter destruction of the enemy, and indeed makes it a necessity,
because the return to Palestine means, in reality, using force
through the free use of the gun. Begin says, "I have been taught by
my father that we, the Jews, should return to the land of Israel,
and we should not use the terms travel, go or come, but we should
use the term 'return', which is a completely different and
comprehensive idea (14)." The education system is not designed by a
guide, who is calling for a redefining of the law of murder, but
rather by the father, who has become obsessed by the Zionist
bigotry and is able to recognize that Zionism has been imposed upon
him. Accordingly, education is establishing the metaphysical maxims
that abolish speech and considers these maxims the prime principle
of reason. Consequently, the trained, and hence closed, brain does
not accept to 'travel' or to 'go' but to 'return', which means to
go back to a familiar place, in this case the Promised Land, from
which the brain and the soul should not be away (15).

This Fascist-style education disregards the historical realities
and has re-written the history of the region, so as to justify its
claims. This new version of history has been imposed upon the world
at large. Thus, it looks for the justifications to commit murder
before the intended victims have even been found. Moshe' Menohen
says, "They taught us to hate and disdain the Arabs even in the
gym, and they have taught the necessity to banish them, because
Palestine is our homeland, as mentioned in the Old Testament." The
mania for violence, which is cherished by the Zionist ideology,
leads it to sanctify and glorify whatever encourages the use of the
sword.

Education also sanctifies the Zionist ideology itself, which is
used as a role model for the education system. Thus by citing the
sacred verses of the Old Testament to suit the Zionist objectives,
they have been able to make it an educational principle to urge and
justify all the massacres which have taken place in the past and
all of those which will occur in the future. It is mentioned in the
book of Yusha' that, "The people called and used the trumpets so
the wall fell in its place, they entered the city and murdered all
its people, males, females, children, and the old people, even the
cows, goats, and donkeys, using swords" (Yusha' 6/20). It is also
mentioned that, "Yusha' had captured Muqeideh that day and murdered
all the people, he did the same in Jericho and then moved to
Labneh, and did the same as in Jericho" (Yusha' 10/28). This
typical text, which cherishes the use of terrorism and murder, does
not lurk in the pages of some little-used book, but it is the
essence of the Zionist education programme.

Therefore, the murder of the Arabs is not only seen as a justified
act, but it is considered that it should be an ambition for the
young people, and indeed it is seen as a way for them to be loyal
to their inherited education and culture. To make sure that these
texts, and indeed the education system in general, has been
effective, the students are tested on this subject at school, with
the following two questions: First, 'Do you consider what Yusha'
Ben did was right or wrong, and why?'; secondly, 'Suppose the
Israeli forces have occupied an Arab village and they have done the
same as Yusha' Ben Noon did in Jericho, would you agree, and why?'
The Zionist Professor, George Tamarine justified this type of
questioning by saying, "What Yusha' did was not the only pattern in
the Old Testament, however, it was chosen because Yusha's Book is
significant to the Israeli education system". He added, "The goal
of the war has been the occupation of the land, and so the Israelis
were quite right in killing all the population of the city when
they occupied it, because we do not want strangers in Israel."

The Zionist ideology is very efficient, and consequently it makes
sure that all forms of education have been received and
comprehended by the students. Consequently, while the topic of
'terrorism' is an optional subject, it should be taken if the
students are loyal to the Zionist ideology. The young students are
taught to accept the massacres that have occurred in the past and
to promise to repeat them in the future. Thus the Zionist professor
points out that Yusha's Book is one of the most significant in the
Zionist education system. This reveals the intimate relationship
between the Zionist ideology and the Biblical heritage, and shows
that the modern Israeli education system does not ascribe to the
new colonial philosophies, but rather it is a continuation of the
summary of the Old Testament.

The Zionist education system has made Yusha' into a national hero,
who is shown as a symbol of the heroism of the past and as an
example for each Jew to follow. On the other hand, the Zionists
ignore the works of Spenosa, the rational Jewish philosopher, and
the teachings of the contemporary Jewish scientist, Einstein, who
refused to become the President of Israel. The Zionists have chosen
to emphasize Yusha', a bloody and aggressive character, as the
ideal which should be followed by all Israelis. Thus, under the
Zionist education system, the ugly and generally repulsive aspects
of human history, starting from Yusha' on up to the American
persecution of the Red Indians, are celebrated. The example of
Yusha' has been used by the Zionists to create millions of new
Yushas, armed with the latest military technology in order to
destroy the villages and murder the inhabitants. Such a use of the
dead to create heroes is similar to the methods used in the Fascist
education programmes. The Fascists also use ancestors to create an
example for the people to follow. For example, under Hitler it was
the "pure Arian", under Mussolini it was "the Perfect Roman"; this
is also the case with the slogans of the contemporary French
Fascist, Jean Marie Lu'pen, who promotes the idea of "the pure
French civilization". All the many facets of Fascism, including
Zionism, do not recognize reality because it is generally not
conducive to the attainment of their objectives. On the contrary,
they see it as an absolute necessity to create false threats, foes
and excuses, and then to 'educate' the people about these matters.
Finally, the Zionist education system teaches that the illusions
that they have promoted as truth, can only be realized through
bloodshed, policies of house destruction and land confiscation.

3. The Philosophies of Terrorism and Force
Since Zionism relies upon a form of apartheid, it should be led to
destroy its foes based upon the principle of apartheid that teaches
"survival is for the best". In other words, in order to protect
themselves, the superior race has authority to control, by whatever
means, the lower, inferior race. This is considered to be a natural
law of survival. However, the Zionists also rely on the false claim
that the Jews have been persecuted throughout ages, which gives
them the justification to behave as they do.

According to the Zionist perspective, the Jew has lived under
continual persecution throughout time and therefore he has to raise
his sword against all his foes and seek retribution. Begin believed
that the Jews would not be able to live peacefully unless they
proved that they were the strongest, that they have to be
merciless, because being merciful is a sign of weakness and would
threaten the existence of the Jews. In addition to natural
philosophy and false history, Zionism has tried to achieve the
establishment of a so-called "vital domain", which entails the
erection of walls and easily defendable borders, or the creation of
a natural extension to the State, so as to facilitate its
political, economic and ideological movement. Thus, the existence
of the State of Israel naturally requires the use of force, because
this State is surrounded by the Arabs, who should be sent a clear
message that they will be exterminated if they do not accept the
Zionist ideology.

The philosophy and practices of the Zionists rely on both modern
ideas as well as the ancient religion of the Jews. This is because
the Jewish religion, as created by the rabbis, remains as a source
of inspiration for all those who adopt terrorism and glorify force.
The Prophet Ezekeil says, "Do not be merciful, murder everybody,
including the young, the old, the virgins, the children and the
women, all of whom should be destroyed." It is also mentioned in
the Talmud that, "The Jew should murder an infidel because this
will make him closer to God." It also says, "Jesus Christ and his
disciples are infidels". Yahuthkia says that, "This statement
includes all the pagans". On the other hand, Memanoud interprets
the words of God, which say "Do not kill" as meaning "God prohibits
the killing of the Jews", and in addition, the Jews should "Forgive
the non-Jew even he is an atheist, kills an Israeli, or if he has
slept with a Jewish woman, as long as he becomes a Jew".

Hence, we have two representations of murder: the first urges the
committing of murder, regardless of any ethical or moral reference,
and it considers murder a permitted action, without any limitations
or restrictions, being applicable for all, men, women, children and
the elderly. The second representation supplements the first,
because it permits the killing of non-Jews in retribution; this
applies to all peoples who are not of the Jews, including Jesus,
and all his followers, who are considered to be infidels.
Consequently, the world is divided into two parts; the first is the
realm of the Jew who stands with a raised sword, and the second is
the realm which belongs to all non-Jews, who must be exterminated.
This philosophy is a result of the belief that the Jew is the
mirror of God on earth, and that therefore in his role as God's
reflection on earth, he is capable of distinguishing between faith
and unfaith. Again, this is similar to the image of the Arian, as
used in the Hitlerite philosophy of Resenburgh, which divides the
world into black and white, or man and beasts, with the role of man
being to clear the earth of all fierce and primitive life forms.

The Jewish theology teaches, that the universe will not be
beautiful unless it is cleansed by the Jewish sword of all the foes
of the Jews; hence murder has become the sole means of achieving
this beauty. In searching for this beauty, the Zionists have
simplified the first teachings of Zionism, so that they are close
to the teachings of the church and political reality, which rely on
terrorism. Under these teachings, since most of people are
barbarians, the best way to rule them is through violence and
terrorism, rather than through democracy or social debates. The
wise men can impose absolute racial discrimination, because the
world is divided into savages and the chosen few, who have the
right to govern the entire world. Thus the Zionists do not simply
talk about the kingdom of Jerusalem, the Promised Land, or Utopia,
they believe that they have the right to rule the whole world.

As we have already discussed, the Zionists believe that this can
only be achieved through murder and war. Indeed, it is argued that
war is the beginning and the end, and that it is the way of the
strong, while politics is for the weak. The wise men of Zion found
their beliefs on history and human experience-they believe that
people were originally ruled by brutal, blind force and later by
law, which they see as being one and the same thing. Zionism
expresses three facts: first, that brutality is an innate part of
human nature; secondly, Zionism accepts the brutal side of human
history and does not recognize the enlightenment, which emphasizes
the right of all peoples to live peacefully. It does not even
approach the humanitarian ideas of Russell, Albert Einstein, and
Karl Marx, instead it refers to the pre-human phase or the "human
cattle" society, where man was ruled solely by instinct, far away
from the rational development phases of humanity. Thus Zionism
adopts the use of blind instinct and refers to the man of the
primitive era, where he was ruled by instinct, while it disregards
the development of human societies, rationally, ethically and
culturally; and thirdly, because Zionism disregards the development
of the human society, it equates modern law with the natural laws
of brutal force, thus completing its circle of darkness.

Zionism epitomizes the use of war instead of politics, persecution
instead of debate, instinct instead of reason, the old instead of
the new, and the Jews instead of all others. As they have said, "We
are the source of terrorism everywhere, and all people belonging to
various origins and faiths are keen on serving our goals." They
state that their policy is one of force and double-dealing because
they can see that success can be achieved by force, especially
force which is necessary for the politician who must depend upon
his genius, violence and cunning. Zionism does not only adopt the
use of terrorism, war and force, it also disdains all that is
considered to be humane and ethical, thus it glorifies
double-dealing and cunning, and considers them innate qualities for
the genius. Such a philosophy binds humanity with evil, sheds blood
and denies the human standards, which confirms the unity of human
society, the development of reason and the promotion of the human
culture. This is because racialism denies humanity, sheds blood,
monopolizes the human qualities, and generally does not recognize
humanity, except as an inferior standard. Ben Gurion rationalized
and justified terrorism when he said that the rifle was invented to
kill others and that the soldier is the means to carry this out,
and that this is the case just as water is for drinking and air is
for breathing. Furthermore, that "Armed and powerful people are to
be considered as a danger against themselves as well as others,
especially when they are more powerful than the others,
consequently we should exterminate them. This is the mission of the
Hagana members who must always be merciless, bearing in mind that
man has never been an angel, but consists merely of flesh and
blood, that he may misuse his powers unless he is always under
control."

Ben Gurion has revived the teachings of Zion's wise men, and he has
rationalized these teachings, proposing that the armed man is a
natural phenomenon that develops just as all other natural
phenomena do. He teaches that arms are a natural part of the
universe, and that the fighter grows as naturally as the plants;
this is an idea that is similar in many ways to the belief in the
law of the jungle. On another level, he discusses the political
economy of force, which, he argues, will turn upon its creator as
well as society unless it is channelled through carefully chosen
methods, such as terrorism. He proposes that such a policy will
achieve balance in the society which otherwise risks being
destroyed. This is similar to the power of sexual energy, which can
cause negative and destructive psychiatric symptoms, unless it is
released. Consequently, in order to preserve both the body and
soul, the use of violence is deemed to be a necessity.
Respectively, the means to control this energy is through a
'superpower', which does not suppress violence but rather
systematically unleashes it. Thus, according to Ben Gurion, the
State is the instrument to control and channel violence to the
right path, that, although violence should be regulated, it is
essential to the existence of the State.

This philosophy considers violence to be a natural instinct and
murder a natural necessity, that man cannot achieve a healthy
balance unless he releases his destructive potential through the
act of killing. It is interesting to note here that Ben Gurion has
ignored the possibility of releasing this latent energy through
other means, such as sports, arts and community work. The reasoning
here is flawed because it does not give any investigation into
other possibilities, rather it ignores them because they do not
suit the desired objective, the supremacy of the Jews and the
annihilation of all other races. Despite this flawed philosophy,
the Zionist ideology is able to permeate daily life with continual
violence, soldiers and the importance of the State. Hagana itself
is a terrorist organization based on its own political and economic
principles.

A predicament for Zionism has been its inability to truly justify
its brutal philosophy, which is therefore couched in acceptable
'civilized' terms. Ben Gurion, for example, masks the policy of
terrorism with abstract, philosophical terms. On the other hand,
both Egal Aloan and Arthur Coaster are more open in their
expressions. Aloan states, for example, that "The process has been
based on a plan, by which the Deir Yasseen massacre took place,
which had been used to terrify the Arabs in Hebron, five days
before the official declaration of the Jewish State." While Arthur
Coaster states, "The bloodshed at Deir Yasseen was a decisive
psychological factor used to deport the Arabs." The Zionist writer
Michael agrees with this view when he states, "The massacre at Deir
Yasseen was planned with the intention of frightening the Arabs, so
as to make it easier to deport them."
Terrorism, then, has been used as part of a comprehensive policy to
solve the problem of the Palestinians as quickly as possible. In
addition, the need to destroy the enemy at all costs, regardless of
their innocence or rights, makes the use of terrorism an obvious
choice. The Zionists' use of terrorism, which they argue is a
natural part of society, is in reality simply a prelude for a
policy of imperial racialism. As Begin says, "When we look
northwards, we can see the fertile plains of Syria and Lebanon,
when we look eastwards, we can see the Euphrates, the Tigris and
the oil of Iraq, and when we look westwards, we can see Egypt, so
we will not grow unless we settle the problem of land by force and
make the Arabs subservient." Violence is an instinctive part of
Zionism, which needs room to grow, and the Arab countries are seen
as the suitable field for this growth, however the existence of the
Arabs on this land means that they have to be subdued into obeying
the Jews with both body and soul.

The Zionist ideology incorporates two basic factors: the first is
the quality of direct imperialism, and the second is the concealed
nature of the ideology and its regulation of aggression. The State
does not expand due to its hostile nature, but rather because it
needs to grow, thus terrorism is used as a mechanism to force the
Arabs to leave their homeland. This has always been concealed by
philosophical ideas and teachings, which, when removed, reveal the
true nature of Zionism, which can only exist through terrorism.

Absolute Egoism

There has never been any confusion with regards to the concept of
egoism as taught by the Zionist ideology. On the contrary, it is
very clear from the teachings relating to the belief in "God's
Chosen People". The modern philosophy states, "The capital
(Jerusalem), which is home to the grandsons of Hertzl, Kafka and
Shagal, is the most glorious capital in the world." The belief in
the greatness of the State of Israel and its people necessitates
the denial of historical facts, of human development and of the
right of peoples to live peacefully on their land, as well as its
dependence on a policy of apartheid. Such absolute egoism in
Zionism requires that only the history of the Jews is recognized,
thus the Jew is portrayed as the absolute victim of Fascism, Arab
terrorism and of the socialist community; thus the plight of the
Jew is the beginning and the end of all history.

This egoism also measures the progression or regression of
humanity, thereby dictating that whoever disagrees with the Jews is
mistaken, and whoever agrees with them is right and full of truth.
As Jabutensky states, "Everybody except you is wrong, and you are
always right, but do not try to find reasons for this, because it
is not necessary or correct; never admit that your foe is right; if
you are unsure, stay in your home, otherwise do not look
backwards." Thus, without the Jews there can be no truth. This is
the highest form of terrorism, and it is perfect because it is
connected with the idea of "the best species"; thus it has become
the source of all power and law-whatever it does is correct even
when it includes murder and genocide. Such a belief in the one
truth-the Zionist truth-is the ideological base for all potential
acts of terrorism, every criticism or preference for other than the
Jews justifies acts of terror.

Truth in the Zionist ideology is that which justifies its policy,
consequently, what is truth is inextricably bound up with the
declared benefits of Zionism. Zionism is thus the criterion for
truth, all paths leading to Zionism are right, and all beliefs and
principles will not be true unless they serve Zionism. According to
this philosophy, the murder of children, the spreading of vice and
immorality, and the support of tyrants and racialists, are all
forms of defending the truth. As Begin says, "The most necessary
thing is the inner feeling, which makes the illegal legal and vice
versa, so we have masked our illegal actions with a (veneer) of
legality". The concept of truth in this terroristic philosophy is
absolute relativity, which serves the direct interests of the Jews;
thus all standards and norms of humanity are reversed. All things
that go against the interests of the Jews are considered illegal,
while all that goes with them are legal. Consequently, all
Palestinians, Christians and all democratic forces are seen as
illegal because they are against the Zionist ambitions, even the
United Nations becomes an illegal entity when it denounces Zionist
aggression. This is because the Zionists teach that the Jew is a
special race that has absolute legitimacy in all actions, whether
in the form of raids, chemical warfare, poisoning water resources,
destroying houses and supporting dictatorships. Begin states, "A
new type of human has been created from tears, fire, blood and
ashes, and who has not been known for more than 1,800 years. This
is 'the militant Jew', whom the world thought had been buried
forever, but he has been resurrected and he has learned the simple
truth of life and death; he will not die or vanish again." The use
of the phrase "a new type of human being" is evidence of all the
illusions and arrogance of the Jews, as well as the terrorist
philosophy which is adopted by the Zionist ideology. Clearly the
Jew is seen as a super human, subject to different laws, and who
has been created from blood, ashes, fire and tears. Such beliefs
are significant elements of all the racial, chauvinistic and
Fascist philosophies of the world.

Begin's new concept of the "militant Jew", states that the real Jew
is the fighter, whose existence is bound up with the gun, as well
as with the glorification of power, bloodshed, terrorism, murder
and the wanton desire to destroy life. Begin derives all these
forms of aggression from extremists such as Hitler, Neeron and
Hulaku. The use of words and phrases such as ashes, blood, 1,800
years, and so on, all work to show the high, even holy, status that
terrorism is seen to hold by the Zionists. The human ideology,
ascribed to by the majority, deals with the dynamics of life, but
the Zionist ideology glorifies death and the past. Furthermore, as
we have seen previously, the egoism of the Zionists insists that
anyone who objects to the opinions and decisions of the Israeli
State must be suppressed.

A student in a school from the coastal region of Israel wrote, "The
purpose of the war was the capturing of the land by Israelis; they
did well when they deported the people and occupied the cities,
because we do not want strangers in Israel." Clearly then, all
people, other than the Jews, are strangers, who should be
suppressed and disposed of. This young student talks simply about
occupation, strangers and killing people as if they are normal
occurrences that are essential for life. The student's choice of
words automatically reflects his Fascist education, which
emphasizes the killing of others, because the existence of a Jew
automatically nullifies the rights of the opposition.

On the other end of the scale, from the egoism of the Jewish race,
is the inferiority, baseness and filthiness of all other races. The
writer Moshe' Menahem admits that, "They impressed the evil into
our hearts, saying repeatedly that our native land should be
cleared of all strangers, especially the Arab Palestinians." This
statement shows how the Zionist ideology depends upon repetition
and various forms of brainwashing, until the Jew becomes an
embodiment of malice and hatred, with a closed brain, ready to
carry into action all the teachings, orations and broadcasts of the
leaders. He is taught to equate 'strangers' with filthiness, and to
believe that the land will not be cleansed until all others are
destroyed.

The concept of absolute egoism is inter-related with the ideas of
hegemony and domination, because it teaches that the Semites are
super-human, and that all others are inferior to him. It is
therefore essential that they have control over everything, as
otherwise they will lose their super-human qualities. Ben Gurion
said in his address to a group of students that, "The map of Israel
is not the (true) map of our land, because we have another map
which should be understood by you, the young; the Jewish nation
must extend the boundaries of its State from the Nile to the
Euphrates." The phrase "another map" is a strategic slogan to show
that the land of Palestine is just the starting point, that the
Israeli State one day aims to capture all the Arab lands and
beyond. This 'other map' is not limited, either chronologically or
spatially. When we understand the true Zionist objectives, as
expressed by the very existence of this 'other' map, it becomes
clear that the occupation of the Sinai and the Golan Heights was a
partial fulfilment of the Zionist objectives, as was the
destruction of the Iraqi nuclear reactor, the PLO headquarters in
Tunis, and the invasion of Southern Lebanon. This map is not merely
representative of geographical considerations, it also incites and
directs the policy of terrorism and persecution, with the aim to
destroy all that goes against Judaism.

The Old Testament orders, "Now, kill whatever is in front of you,
men, women, children, infants, cows, camels, and donkeys, do not
leave anything." From this, the Zionists teach that all people,
other than the Jews, should be killed and deprived of everything.
This suggests, then, that the Zionists believe that the whole world
should be free for the Jews, as it is stated in the Bible that,
"These cities are given to you by the force of God." Consequently,
the Zionists believe they have a God-given right to capture the
cities of others. Furthermore, that to do otherwise means that they
are disobeying God, that to live in peaceful co-existence is
against God's teachings.

The Blind Spirit

A primary quality of the Zionist ideology is the absolute belief in
the divine message of the Jewish religion. This leads to the belief
that the Jews-God's Chosen People-must control everything, because
the whole world has been created by the power of God. The Jew must
be entirely dedicated to this ideology, and he must work to
recreate the reality as seen by Zionism. A Zionist says, "I was a
member of a gang who was raised in the paradise of the settlements
in Jerusalem; by the time I was 15 years old, I had learned well
all the aspects of Jewish life, and I was taught the 'Political
Jewish Nationalism' until I became 20 years old. The students were
taught Hertzl's teachings at school. One student was the son of
Safy Moshe' Sharite (Shertouk, before he changed his name after the
establishment of Israel), who became the Prime Minister after Ben
Gurion withdrew from the government." The words and phrases that he
uses shows the pride that he feels in being so educated and his
reverence of the Zionist ideology. The real Zionist, then, is one
who has been born and brought up according to these principles, and
who hence becomes a legitimate son of this racial State. The use of
the term "gang" shows the disregard that Zionism has for all
familiar human terms, whereas the term "gang" generally represents
a distasteful idea the world over, under Zionism, it is a symbol of
pride and dignity. Such pride in themselves as Jews is emphasized
in the statement, "We are the first graduates of the Zionist temple
of Jewish political nationalism; we swear to rescue our land
'Palestine' and to deport all the Arabs by any means necessary."

Such blind belief in this ideology has turned the schools into
sacred temples for the cause, while the graduate is seen to be a
fully trained 'holy' warrior, whose task is the liberation of
Palestine from the infidel Arabs. The Zionist ideology has thus
used religion, and what the Jews consider to be holy, as a means to
justify all their political illusions and to thus enable them to
achieve their goals. Clearly then the purpose of the Zionist
education system is to teach the necessity of force. The Zionist
mechanism uses all the Western terms of education and psychology to
create a blind, bigoted and closed nation, which will serve its
goals. Thus, education has become the rituals, schools have become
the temples, and reason has become a means of destruction and
terrorism.

The terrorist rabbi Kahana epitomized this blind spirit when he
stated that he was "a nuclear bomb", which would destroy all the
Arabs. He clearly considers terrorism to be a part of religion when
he states, "The faster we wage the holy war to destroy the Arabs,
the sooner the salvation of the world will be completed with the
appearance of the Messiah, and the Jews will then live a thousand
years in peace." Kahana believes that the Messiah will not come
unless all the Arabs are exterminated according to the Messiah's
desires. Both Kahana and Perez agree on this point, but they
diverge in the methods taken to achieve this goal. The former
depends on theological terrorism and expresses himself frankly,
while the latter depends on the principles of power and
persecution. While they differ in their choice of words, their
objective is the same-to get rid of the Arabs. This is because all
Zionists come from the same mould and believe that Jewish goals can
only be achieved through terrorism.

Throughout the world, reason is based on the logical relationship
between cause and effect, but under Zionism all standards are
reversed, to unify what cannot be unified and to give positive
qualities to negative things and vice versa. For example,
Jabutensky states, "My son's job as an official of the illegitimate
immigration programme, which helps the Jews come to Palestine, is a
great honour." Consequently, honour is viewed under Zionism as
working for an illegal immigration programme, to reverse all the
existing, normal relations, and to either deport all the
Palestinians or to kill them.

Honour is Synonymous with the Generation of Immigration and Death

The irrational nature of Zionism does not only appear in the
inversion of all logical criteria, but it also includes all aspects
of life, such as the usurpation of land and murder, which is
committed, not as a result of hostility but due to the mystery of
the Jews.

"We should not forget that Israel, for which we have been fighting,
is not the UN's concept of the division of land, but it is the
whole State of Israel, based on our strategies and fate, to capture
our native land from the Nile to the Euphrates." The objective to
forcefully occupy land is a clear intention of aggression, but it
is concealed by the ideas of fate, hope and the realization of old
dreams. Thus, the Zionists hide the policy of land occupation
behind elaborate smoke screens, which portrays that the Jews have
been given a mission by God, and they are simply obeying God's
teachings, for which they should not be blamed. Indeed, the God of
the Zionists is a violent being, full of hatred and arrogance. "God
comes from far away, indignant, with a full mouth, talking to his
Chosen People, saying, 'I am the only God who makes his swords
drunk by blood; My sword eats the flesh of the dead enemy', because
God has revenge on his foes, for the blood of his servants and the
land of his people", and as we have already seen, the Zionists, by
their own admission, are simply the reflection of their God on
earth.

The irrationality of this ideology leads to murder and manic
destruction, and it denies all humane ideas and traditions.

Furthermore, it reverses what is legal to what is illegal, and goes
against common sense through its violation of human norms. As the
rabbi Shar says, "The rabbi can grace the people if the dead is not
a Jew, because killing others is not considered a crime but an
action which pleases God." Thus, for the Zionists murder is a
ritual which is blessed by the rabbis; furthermore that the faith
of the Jew won't be perfected unless he kills others, especially
the Palestinians. The Talmud states, "Murder is best, and the Jews
are not allowed to rescue anybody, whoever he is, or take him out
of a hole in which he has fallen, especially the pagans", and it
adds, "If any of the pagans fall in a hole, close it with a big
stone." Memanoud says, "It is not allowed to pity the pagans, even
if they fall in a river, or are endangered, because all the seven
peoples who were in the Canaanite land should have been killed by
the Jews, but some of those escaped and mixed with other nations,
and so they must all be killed, and whoever does not kill is an
infidel." Murder has several justifications in Judaism, including
religion, self-defence, history, superiority and racialism. In
addition, the racialism, imperialism and militarism of Zionism all
depend upon murder and the overall destruction of man.

The Extremist Zionist Movements

These movements are the best example of the Zionist policy of
terrorism, which ignores diplomatic language, political cunning,
and has little regard for its image locally or internationally.
These groups meet the needs of all Zionists, who use them to
camouflage their own political goals, because they are
semi-official organizations. Furthermore, these groups direct the
movement of all the settlers and are even represented by some of
the Zionist politicians.

1. Gosh Emunim
This is the most extreme Zionist movement. It believes in the
entire Judaization of land, State and traditions; it disregards
everything except what is Jewish. It was founded by the Ashkenazi
theologist, Raf Cook, who established the first Merkaz Hraf
movement in 1924. His beliefs were based on religious teachings.
For example, he states, "The return of Judaism to Palestine, the
re-housing of the Jews and the use of land is the beginning of
Salvation." He died in 1935. His teachings continued after his
death, even though his ideas emphasized the spiritual rather than
the political. This movement appeared after the October war (the
Ramadan war) in 1973, when defeat was justified due to the argued
deviation from Judaism and the religious texts, in that the
existence of the Arabs in Palestine goes against the Jewish
religion. The movement is presently directed by Tsevy Yahuda Cook,
Raf Cook's son, who interprets all the necessary religious texts to
justify all forms of terrorism, while others carry out these
directions.

Moshe' Lavenger is the rabbi and prominent Zionist who is
conspicuous in propagating these ideas, with pronouncements such
as, "Arabs go to Hell". He wanders from one place to another, to
encourage terrorists all over the country to take action; he even
attacks the Government, which he believes has become unable to
defend the Jewish ideals, spirit and State. Lavenger was born in
Jerusalem in 1935 to a German family. He was educated at religious
schools, and he then joined the "Nahal" or the military
settlements. Later he studied at the religious schools in order to
become a rabbi. In 1968, he moved to Hebron where he established a
nuclear colony called Qiryat Arba. He paid a lot of attention to
the young, teaching them to frighten the Arabs, and of the
necessity of deporting them, using various methods of terrorism. He
ignores all the classical, diplomatic norms and values, and instead
adopts the brutal ideas common to Fascism, which go against reason.


This movement aims at the establishment of "The Great Israel",
which is in common with other extremist movements such as Herout
and the National Religious Party. It believes in the power of the
young and the scholars, and it attempts to correlate between these
and the extremists, to achieve the perfect system. It rejects all
forms of compromise and instead gives emphasis to groups of
agitators, who lead the riots and rebellions. The organization of
this movement does not begin with the relationship between the base
and the headquarters, rather it pays greater attention to the
young, choosing those who it sees as having potential, and then
educates them at special religious schools. These schools are
divided into two types; the intermediate schools, which prepare the
students ideologically; they are then sent to the army, where they
are trained for six months, after which they return to school.
Secondly, the religious schools belong to the Raf Centre in
Jerusalem and are supported by the Ministry of Defence. These
schools prepare the commando troops, "Cook", under the supervision
of Tesvy Yahuda, a tyrannical agitator, who is on good terms with
the army, and who is a living manifestation of Begin's idea of "the
Jewish warrior."

Despite the intimate relationships between this movement and the
army, its activities are extremely secret, especially with regard
to the higher positions and the leadership. As a result, all its
activities are rapid and carried out without warning, and include
targets such as demonstrations and the Arabs. Other activities,
such as the settlements, involve all members and are generally
carried out with great rapidity in order to frighten the enemy as
much as possible. For example, under the great demonstration named
"The Land of Israel", which took place after the 1967 war, 250,000
Jews moved to establish a multitude of colonies. The movement
believes that Zionism is not just a State, but a way of life, which
includes the use of religion, arms and land in daily life. Its
political system emphasizes the gathering of all the Jews in
Palestine so as to establish a religious Jewish community, which
should settle in the land of Israel, from the Nile to the
Euphrates, and which will be independent in all its decisions,
politically and economically.

2. Kakh Movement
This is a perfect example of a terrorist organization in Israel. It
depends on both a Mafia-like organization as well as religion,
which it uses to conceal its true objectives through reference to
the Old Testament. It was established by Me'eir Kahana, an
internationally renowned terrorist and the founder of the Jewish
Defence Organization, which is on good terms with several Mafia
bosses. He came to Palestine in 1969 after he had become a
professional terrorist, and he established the principle of "Roof",
which teaches that all traitors (those who accept the existence of
Arabs on the land of Israel) should be killed. His next step was to
establish the Kakh movement.

Me'eir Kahana belonged to a family of rabbis, who migrated to the
USA in the early 1900s. He was born in New York in 1932 and was
named Me'eir Marten. He was educated by his father, the rabbi
Charles Kahana. He later worked for the "Betar" organization, but
he did not join their programme because he did not consider it to
be the perfect terrorist organization. He went on to join the "Bani
Akeevsa" organization. He began a career in law, but this soon
ended and he then came to Israel.
In addition to Kahana, another prominent personality of the Kakh
movement was Za'eif, who was killed in Hebron in 1980. He was
Christian and a Vietnam veteran known for his sadism. He was
injured and sent back to the USA. He later became a Jew, at which
time he moved to Palestine to continue his career in terrorism. One
of the most extreme members of this organization is Yuval Larner,
who moved to Palestine from the USA. He was a founder of the Jewish
Defence Organization, and he vehemently propagated the destruction
of the Arabs, an idea which he facilitated with the establishment
of the 'Violence Groups', which worked to deport the Arabs through
all means. Other members include Jad Srougan, Kahana's assistant,
Yahuda Renheiter and Yussy Dayan.

These movements are both very similar, with similar methods of
terrorism and similar beliefs, as we can see from the Kakh
programme, which includes the following ideas: (a) the deportation
of the Arabs; (b) the Jews are God's Chosen People; and (c) the
Jewish kingdom, granted by God, includes all the land from the Nile
to the Euphrates. The terrorist actions of this movement include
the strict control of Al Aqsa Mosque, the bombing of the Dome of
the Rock, the burning of Al Aqsa, the attack on an Arab vehicle
near Jerusalem and the planting of numerous bombs in the Arab
quarter of Jerusalem. The Kakh organization carries out the plans
of the Zionist organization and, as such, is a silent member of the
Zionist movement.

The Government believes it is necessary to reduce the number of
Arabs, while Kahana believes that Arabs should be deported by
force, unless they accept to stay, not as citizens, but as servants
or taxpayers. The difference between the Government and Kahana's
movement is in the language; the former uses the term
'demographical imbalance', while the latter uses the phrase
'deportation by force', both of which have the same connotation.

Both the organizations of Gush Emunim and Kakh are very similar,
because both depend on the concept of "the agitator Jew". They both
inspire teamwork by playing on the emotions, and they depend upon
the principle of chauvinism to awaken the hostile instincts in the
young and the religious. Membership to either organization is
attained through the signing of a statement, or through an
application. Kahana says, "This organization is financed by
donations from the USA"; this is not completely true because it is
also supported by official departments in Israel. Kahana died
before he realized his dream of the complete deportation of the
Arabs.

The Non-Existent Competition

In addition to the above-mentioned movements, there are two further
terrorist organizations, but they are not any different in their
teachings or their objectives from Gush Emunim or Kakh. This is not
surprising because Zionism is the theory and practice of terrorism,
and the competition within the various terrorist groups is not due
to political or ideological attitudes, but rather to geographical
and historical realities. Consequently, the existence of numerous
terrorist movements does not necessarily mean there are different
attitudes, but it is due to the different types of people who make
up the State of Israel. In other words, the different backgrounds
of the Jews, which is dependent upon their origins, gives them
different attitudes to various issues. For example, the Jews who
came from the West are different from those who came from the East.
Another reason for the existence of various groups is the gap
between the theory which says that the land of Israel is from the
Nile to the Euphrates, and the difficulties of the practical
realization of this dream.

This problem has resulted in hostile activities over the years,
especially after the October war in 1973, the siege of Beirut in
1982, and the daily persecution, which occurred during the
Intifadah. This was a result of the belief that the Zionist plan
had not yet been realized because the leaders had not used
terrorism to its full potential, the Jews must be more active and
determined, and the Government must at all times be true to the
ideology of Zionism and never show weakness.

The democratic ideology corrects its path in a democratic way, but
the terrorist ideology depends ultimately on terrorism to achieve
its goals and this, ironically, is the beginning of the end of any
terrorist ideology. These considerations make all research into the
differences between the programmes of the various terrorist
organizations meaningless, because in reality there are no
differences. In fact, the variety of these organizations is the
core of the Zionist State.

Notes and References

1. Hertzl's Diaries, ch. 1, p. 88; The International Affairs
Magazine, New York, vol. 1, 1965, p. 93.
2. Wiseman, Trial and Error, New York, 1949, p. 44.
3. Fayez Al-Sayegh, The Zionist Imperialism in Palestine, The
Research Centre, Beirut, 1965, p. 37.
4. Hertzl's Diaries, ch. 1, p. 98.
5. Hertzl Diaries, ch. 1, p. 88.
6. Documents of the British Policy 1919-1939, London, 1952, p. 345.

7. Teshreen Newspaper, 12/8/1982, Syria.
8. Teshreen Newspaper, Ibid.
9. Yousuf Waneetz, My Diaries and My Letters, Tel Aviv, 1965, p.
116.
10. Yousuf Waneetz, Ibid., Al-Hureya Magazine, 22 December 1991.
11. Al-Neda'a, Lebanese newspaper, 25 September 1982.
12. George Rounet, Invasion through Immigration, California, 1968,
p. 126.
13. Al-Naqd Al-Jadeed Magazine, Paris, 1973, the tenth issue.
14. Dr. Georgy Kana'an, Jewish Racialism, p. 194.
15. Dr. Georgy Kana'an, Ibid., p. 200.
16. Dr. Moh'd Nasser, Zionism and the Zionist Propaganda, Watani
Magazine,Belgrade, issue 90, 1989.
17. Dr. Moh'd Nasser, Between Settlement and Immigration, Watani
Magazine, Belgrade, issue 102, 1990.
18. Steven Goranouv, The Reality of Zionism, Sofia, 1981, p. 29.
19. B. Ranyouf, The Paths of Zionism, Sofia, 1969, p. 48.
20. B. Ranyouf, Ibid., p. 49.
21. Belzakh, The New Criticism Magazine, issue 17.
22. Al-Rayeh, Jordan, 24 June 1986.
23. Ibid.
24. Dr. Moh'd Nasser Al-Kawaldeh, The Ideology, Constituents, and
Pillars of the Zionist Programme, Al-Dustour, The Political File, 6
April 1997.
25. Al-Thawreh, Daily Syrian newspaper, 18 January 1986.
26. Ibid.
27. Al-Dustour, from Davar, the Israeli newspaper, 17 April 1984.
28. Youry Ivanouv, Be Careful of Zionism, Moscow, 1969, p. 87.
29. Hertsburg, The Zionist Idea, New York, 1966, p. 87.
30. F.A. Semouneek, National Bigotry Mania, p. 77.
31. Palestinian Affairs, issue 2566, 1973.
32. Dr. Georgy Kana'an, Ibid., p. 69.
33. Dr. Moh'd Nasser Al-Khawaldeh, Al-Dustour, The Political File,
6 April 1997.
34. Youry Ivanouv, Ibid., p. 119.
35. Qadaya Magazine, Fall, 1961, p. 3.
36. Dr. Moh'd Nasser Al-Khawaldeh, Ibid.
37. Dr. Moh'd Nasser, Between Settlement and Immigration, Watani
Magazine, Belgrade, issue 102, 1990.
38. Ibid.
39. Dr. Moh'd Nasser, Between Settlement and Immigration, Ibid.
40. Moshe' Menohen, The Degradation of Judaism Nowadays, New York,
1965, p. 95.
41. Monia Mardour, A Really Illegal Book, New York, 1964, p. 122.
42. Dr. Georgy Kana'an, Ibid., p. 67.
43. The Labour Leftism, Paris, March 1972.
44. Palestinian Affairs Magazine, issue 25.





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om