-Caveat Lector- Hey Joshua, thanks a lot for proving my point with your quote below.
Sorry to burst your bubble, pal, but you Greens (Reds, really) do not have a monopoly on environmental policy or morality. > Joshua2 wrote: > Ha ha ha ha ha ha. That's so funny! And yes... environmentalism in some form WILL be the idea and primary cause of the extinction of Capitalism. > > Greens are like watermelons -- green on the > outside > > and red on the inside. > > --- Nurev Ind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 9:42 AM > Subject: Re: [CTRL] Global Warming: Socialisms > Trojan Horse > > > > -Caveat Lector- > > > > So true. > > > > Greens are like watermelons -- green on the > outside > > and red on the inside. > > > > Ha ha ha ha ha ha. That's so funny! Try this one > genius. > What's you on the outside, and dead on the inside? > > Green is not socialism moron. Green is EVERYTHING. > > Fortunately most people in the world have enough > brains to > understand that their very existance depends on the > good > functioning of the natural environment. > > And yes... environmentalism in some form WILL be the > idea > and primary cause of the extinction of Capitalism. > But that's > because capitalism is THE MOST DESTRUCTIVE FORCE TO > THE > ENVIRONMENT in the world at this time, and more > folks come > to understand this every day. Since most people are > poor and > don't have ANY vested interest in a system which > only serves the > rich and the greedy who desperately want to be rich, > it's obvious > that Capitalism is on the way out. > > You and Johnson should submit your names to the " > Darwin's" > list for consideration. > > Enjoy it while you can, > Joshua2 > > > > > > > --- "M. A. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Caveat Lector- > > > > > > ~~for educational purposes only~~ > > > [Title 17 U.S.C. section 107] > > > > > > Global Warming: Socialism's Trojan Horse > > > by Eric Englund > > > > > > On February 14, 2002, President Bush provided > > > details for > > > his plan to combat global warming. The > cornerstone > > > of his > > > plan is to promote voluntary reductions in > > > greenhouse gas > > > emissions. Naturally, environmentalists were > > > outraged that > > > President Bush refused to adhere to the Kyoto > > > Treaty. It > > > is President Bush's contention that the Kyoto > > > protocol would > > > cost nearly 5,000,000 jobs in the U.S. alone. Of > > > course, > > > environmentalists claimed that there is a bigger > > > picture > > > here. All people, especially those living in > > > industrialized > > > countries such as the U.S., must sacrifice in > order > > > to win > > > the universal struggle against global warming. > As we > > > have > > > seen over the past three decades, > environmentalists > > > have > > > succeeded in eroding property rights in the > United > > > States in > > > order to protect Mother Earth as they see fit > (i.e. > > > through > > > the Clean Water Act, through the Endangered > Species > > > Act, > > > through ridiculous wetlands legislation, through > air > > > quality > > > laws, etc). Whether or not President Bush > > > understands this, > > > the real struggle is between liberty and > > > totalitarianism. > > > For if environmentalists succeed in gradually > taking > > > away > > > our private property rights, then a free market > and > > > liberty > > > cannot exist. Thus, it is my contention that the > > > struggle > > > against environmentalism is actually a struggle > for > > > liberty > > > (using the classical liberal definition). > > > > > > Undoubtedly, environmentalists will take > exception > > > to being > > > called illiberal socialists (but I repeat > myself). > > > Perhaps > > > there are those of you who are alarmed about > global > > > warming > > > and sympathize with the environmental/green > > > movement. My > > > response is for you to be careful with whom you > > > associate; > > > which leads me to provide the following quote > from > > > Dr. George > > > Reisman's magnum opus Capitalism: > > > > > > ... it should not be surprising to see hordes > of > > > former > > > Reds, or of those who otherwise would have > become > > > Reds, > > > turning from Marxism and becoming the Greens > of > > > the > > > ecology movement. It is the same fundamental > > > philosophy > > > in a different guise, ready as ever to wage > war on > > > the > > > freedom and well-being of the individual. > > > > > > So who are these former Reds who have converted > to > > > Green > > > Socialism? One excellent example is Mikhail > > > Gorbachev. Mr. > > > Gorbachev is now the president of Green Cross > > > International > > > (a non-governmental environmental organization). > > > Among the > > > many issues with which Green Cross International > has > > > become > > > involved, global warming is right at the top of > its > > > list. > > > Gosh, when Mikhail Gorbachev, Ronald Reagan, and > > > Margaret > > > Thatcher became so chummy in the mid-1980s, I > never > > > once > > > heard the Soviet dictator express concern about > the > > > environment. > > > Clearly, Mr. Gorbachev has identified > > > environmentalism as a > > > Trojan horse capable of resurrecting socialism > on a > > > global > > > scale. > > > > > > How can I say that about Mikhail Gorbachev? > Didn't > > > he bring > > > glasnost (freedom of speech) and perestroika > > > (economic and > > > political reforms) to the Soviet Union? Indeed > he > > > did. Yet, > > > these were means to his end of trying to save > Soviet > > > Communism > > > and, therefore, to save his absolute and > unspeakable > > > power > > > (that brought human misery to millions). > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
