-Caveat Lector-
-----Original Message-----
From: FAIR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:10 PM
To: FAIR-L
Subject: What Happened in Jenin?
FAIR-L
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
Media analysis, critiques and activism
MEDIA ADVISORY:
What Happened in Jenin?
May 10, 2002
As violence continues in Israel and Palestine, so does debate over what
exactly happened during Israel's invasion of the Jenin refugee camp.
Israel barred journalists and aid workers alike from the camp during the
invasions, but as access restrictions have eased, human rights groups have
issued graphic reports detailing evidence of human rights violations by
the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and possible war crimes.
Some media accounts, too, have vividly described the damage across the
West Bank: One New York Times story (4/11/02) reported that "it is safe to
say that the infrastructure of life itself and of any future Palestinian
state-- roads, schools, electricity pylons, water pipes, telephone lines--
has been devastated." Lately, however, much U.S. coverage and commentary
has passed over investigations of whether the IDF committed widespread
rights abuses in favor of narrower-- and less meaningful-- wrangling over
whether or not the IDF committed a "massacre."
Amnesty International has emphasized that "there is no legal definition in
international law of the word 'massacre'," and that using the term in
reference to Jenin "is not helpful" for determining whether the IDF
violated human rights there (AI press release, 4/29/02). Nevertheless, the
"massacre" question has become central to many journalists' approach to
the story-- even when they don't have a working definition of the word.
One illustration of how poorly media have thought through the concept came
when CNBC's Chris Matthews (Hardball, 4/16/02) asked chief PLO
representative to the U.S. Hasan Abdel Rahman whether he had evidence of a
massacre in Jenin. Rahman turned the tables, asking, "Well, first of all,
what's a massacre?" With disquieting vagueness, Matthews replied, "Oh, a
couple hundred people or civilians or ten or 20 civilians."
Most early estimates in the U.S. press of the number of Palestinians
killed in Jenin ranged from 100 to 200. Media were caught up in the
implications for Israel's image, declaring Jenin a "diplomatic and public
relations minefield" (CBS Evening News, 4/24/02). As initial excavation
work got underway, however, those original figures were downgraded, and
the question for many news outlets became whether Palestinians had
manufactured "massacre" claims. In fact, many of those early casualty
figures had been provided by Israeli officials. "The Israeli army
estimates that it killed 100 to 200 people in eight days of fighting,"
reported CBS Evening News on April 12. On ABC's Nightline (4/11/02), Dave
Marash reported that Israeli defense forces "estimate 100 Palestinian
fighters were killed there, but refused to say where the bodies are, and
they continue to bar news people from the camp."
Once Human Rights Watch (HRW) gained access to the camp, the group was
able to document 52 people killed by the IDF, including 22 civilians, many
of whom "were killed willfully or unlawfully" (press release, 5/3/02).
HRW's report on Jenin didn't focus on the sheer numbers of dead, however.
Instead, the bulk of the report catalogued a pattern of serious human
rights violations in Jenin, some of which the group says may be war
crimes. The abuses include attacking and killing medical personnel, using
civilians as human shields, failing to distinguish between military
targets and civilian homes, and causing "extensive and disproportionate
destruction of the civilian infrastructure"-- so much so that more than a
quarter of Jenin's population is now homeless.
Amnesty International announced similar findings in a May 4 report, "The
Heavy Price of Israeli Incursions," which condemned the IDF invasions of
the Occupied Territories as collective punishment of Palestinians. The
report documents "unlawful killings, destruction of property and arbitrary
detention [and] torture and ill-treatment" by the IDF, and states that
many of these actions violated human rights and international law.
The HRW and Amnesty reports were very direct in their conclusions, but
some journalists nonetheless managed to miss the point. On NPR's May 4
"Weekend Edition," anchor Scott Simon asked NPR analyst Daniel Schorr to
explain what the newly released reports said about Jenin. Schorr said:
"Human Rights Watch has found that there was no massacre as such. Yes,
there were a couple of things that were not very nice. They found Israelis
destroyed more buildings than they absolutely had to. The Israelis say
they had to 'cause they thought they were booby trapped, but Human Rights
Watch says sometimes human beings were used as human shields. Maybe. Some
things happened which were not terribly, terribly nice, and I'm sure they
happened a lot. But if the question is raised that 'Was there a deliberate
massacre of civilians in Jenin?' the answer seems to come out no. "
It's hard to imagine a mainstream U.S. commentator characterizing
civilians being "killed willfully or unlawfully" as "a couple of things
that were not very nice"-- if the perpetrators were an official U.S.
enemy, like Serbia or Iraq. And, of course, in large part it's up to
Schorr and his media colleagues to decide which questions are raised about
Jenin.
Some of those colleagues gave up even on the narrow question of a
massacre, taking the troubling stance that the facts may never be known,
or might not even matter. As CBS Evening correspondent Mark Phillips put
it on April 18, "Did a wholesale massacre take place here? In terms of the
hostility between Palestinians and Israelis, it almost doesn't matter.
Perceptions are what count, and Jenin has already become another reason
for mistrust, hatred and revenge."
The following night, CNN's Christiane Amanpour reached a similar
conclusion: "Jenin will remain for the Palestinians a place of myth and
legend and perhaps even a place of revenge." The same day, NPR's Julie
McCarthy commented that "The story of Jenin is set to live on in memory
and myth." On April 20, CBS's Phillips still didn't know who to trust:
"What happened in Jenin depends on who you believe."
Of course, the job of a journalist is to separate myth from fact, and to
investigate conflicting claims to see which are true. Even when
journalists did try to report what happened at Jenin, however, that
reporting was sometimes sanitized beyond recognition. Consider this
description from the New York Times on April 21: "As Israeli forces
pursued militants, civilians continued getting in the way and dying as a
result."
----------
Feel free to respond to FAIR ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
