-Caveat Lector- On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Franklin Wayne Poley wrote: > > > You know, I've unsubscribed from most of your lists too. > > > I ignore most of your rantings. > > > "Rantings"? "Megalomania"? Any slanderer who wants to make an exit is > > invited to do so. Ethical, competent scientists who can argue and rebut > > and correct, using reasoning, are welcome to stay. > > Stop being paranoid. How are you going to cure this "ranting, paranoid, megalomaniac"? If you can do so online, I guarantee that you will get your article published in the top psych journals. > > > Perhaps after a few more weeks you'll be ready to listen. I am only paying serious attention to a direct, straight-forward analysis of my ESP-P menus word-by-word, line-by-line and statement-by-statement which is the way you would treat the C code associated with it, when I get the C code written. Your mental illnesses PROJECTED online are a serious concern for others I am sure. I would recommend that you be treated as "Alex" was treated by the politicians in "Clockwork Orange" but that is a digression. Mind you, the treatment of Alex led him to fame and fortune. Who knows where it could take you and Livick. In the case of the C code, if I were to run it through my cpp compiler either it would or would not run successfully. Either it would meet the necessary criteria of the machine to 'work' or it would not. Ditto for ESP-P. Either it 'works' by meeting the criteria for (1) programming comprehensivess and (2) plain language clarity, or it does not. Allowing for the fact that it is a first approximation to the final set of menus I would say it DOES WORK. The menus are in the R4P archives. Any honest and competent scholar discussing this on R4P would do exactly that. Either it is or is not an approximation to the set of menus Herbert Schildt could write for the "smart automation" of programming cognitive decision-makers or it is not. > > I am always 100% eager to listen to honest criticisms of my work. When > > are you going to start? > > Well, I was letting Livick do the talking. He was trying to get you to > try to design an algorithm for producing the interaction you desired Neither of you phonies even knows what an algorithm is. Tell us...what is an algorithm? . He > hoped that in doing so you would realize that the problems behind what > you are asking for are significant to say the least. I articulated the problems in machine intelligence over several years. I gave you a SOLUTION (in draft form) which is the set of ESP-P menus. Expanded upon, ESP-Teacher (see [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives) and ESP-Practitioner tell us one way OCW, like MIT's OCW can expand. If thousands of college courses over the next decade take this route, the result will be a huge machine intelligence available to anyone with web connection, an ESP-Scholar more capable of answering questions than any human scholar. To the extent that "self-instruction" works like those of Aitken and Jones; and Schildt (on intro C) succeed, automated courseware will succeed even better. Once you have > reached that epifany we can get back to business. Smarten up. Any politico with a modest budget can put this out to tender for hanging the code on ESP-P. Once that is done, millions of programming geeks like you, worldwide are obsolescent. Geek-speak is only modestly more sophisticated than the chatter of a monkey. Any city clerk in Shanghai can then produce C code and programs from the ESP-P menus without any previous training whatsoever in computing science. Perhaps we can find a job for you and Livick assembling pencils in the Shanghai prison system. Look where prison therapy got "Alex" in Clockwork Orange. > Linux has more source code than my brain. That is saying very little indeed for Linux. Sincerely yours, "Just call me Frederick", from POC (Ministry of Machine Psychology) <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
