-Caveat Lector-

Euphorian spotted this on the Guardian Unlimited site and thought you should see it.

To see this story with its related links on the Guardian Unlimited site, go to 
http://www.guardian.co.uk

Israeli minister backs chief rabbi's views and warns of 'ethical crisis'
Ewen MacAskill in Jerusalem
Friday August 30 2002
The Guardian


An Israeli government minister yesterday warned of a "deep Jewish ethical crisis" as 
he sided with Britain's chief rabbi, Jonathan Sacks, in a row over the 
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The deputy foreign minister, Michael Melchior, himself a former chief rabbi of Norway, 
criticised those, especially from the Israeli right, who ignored the moral dilemmas 
posed for Israel each day by the conflict and who pretended that everything Israel did 
was right.

"If the Palestine situation continues, then this is something that will be tragic for 
all the peoples here," Rabbi Melchior said.

There was almost overwhelming support, too, in a straw poll of British rabbis now 
living in Israel  conducted by the Israeli daily, Ha'aretz.

One of them, Rabbi Michael Marmur, dean of the Hebrew  Union College in Jerusalem, 
said: "I agreed wholeheartedly with (Dr Sacks's) opinions as expressed in the article."

He added: "Occupation and terror are brutalising us. It behoves him to say what he 
thinks in a responsible way. His criticism is appropriate and if we can't bear to hear 
it, the problem is ours."

The support for Dr Sacks came as the row gathered momentum, with views for and against 
being strongly expressed in Israeli dailies and in the Jewish press in Britain.

Much of the venom was directed at the Guardian, which was frequently described as 
anti-Israeli.

The row was sparked by an interview in the Guardian on Tuesday. In it, Dr Sacks argued 
that conflict risked corrupting Israeli culture.

Rabbi Melchior, who is from a small, dovish, religious party, lined up wholeheartedly 
behind Dr Sacks. He told the Guardian: "If I did not believe that Israel, in this 
situation, was basically right, I would not be sitting in the government. But those 
who say it is black-and-white and there is no dilemma and everything is clear, I do 
not think they are serving the cause of Israel." He admitted Israel had made mistakes.

Rabbi Melchior, whose party shared the same platform as Labour at the last election, 
said the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza "could go on for some years but 
after a certain amount of years this becomes a deep Jewish ethical crisis".

The chief rabbi has kept a low profile since the row broke but his official 
spokesperson, Jeremy Newmark, in a statement released yesterday, dismissed as "absurd" 
that his remarks in the interview should be taken as criticism of Israel.

Dr Sacks, in a letter to the chief rabbi of Israel, Yisrael Lau, parts of which were 
published in Ha'aretz yesterday, adopted a more robust tone. He accused the Guardian 
of putting "sensationalist headlines" on his interview. But he did not withdraw any of 
the statements attributed to him.

The Guardian headline was "Israel set on tragic path, says chief rabbi". The Times 
headline reporting the same interview was: "Tragic conflict is corrupting Israel, says 
Sacks." The Daily Telegraph used the headline: "Tragic conflict is corrupting Israel, 
says Britain's chief rabbi."

Britain's Jewish Chronicle, which contained a mixed bag of letters for and against, 
also carried an editorial saying the chief rabbi had made an important point in the 
interview: that the events in Israel which so distressed him were forced upon Israel 
by a failure of Palestinians to negotiate a peace settlement.

In the London Jewish News, Rabbi Shaul Rosenblatt, director of Aish UK, expressed 
surprise that Dr Sacks had given the interview to the Guardian, "the most anti-semitic 
daily newspaper".

Copyright Guardian Newspapers Limited

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to