-Caveat Lector-

>From http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/2002-09-25/fishwrapper.html

Roast the chickenhawks
Chambliss wants you to make the supreme sacrifice he dodged

BY JOHN SUGG


Down in SOUTH-CENTRAL Georgia, among the rattlers, boll weevils and other vermin, is a
breeding ground for what once was an endangered species of foul fowl -- a flock that 
has
found new life after discovering that its favorite food, carrion (preferably dead 
children and
women), would soon be in more than ample supply.

This bird can easily be recognized by its bright plumage, all yellow, its propensity 
to turn tail
and run at the slightest threat, and its trademark screech, "saaacks-BEE! saaacks-BEE!"

Its Latin name is opportunisticum cowardisien," but it is, of course, best known as 
the ...
chickenhawk.

Nourished by fantasies a la John Wayne (a world-class chickenhawk in his day), the 
heady
aroma of war profiteering and faux patriotism, the breed is no longer in peril of 
extinction.
Indeed, watchers (but hardly any in the mainstream media, especially the sad AJC, 
which,
apparently, hopes cheerleading the neocon War Party will boost circulation after all 
else has
failed) report that the nation's capital is butt-to-belly with chickenhawks, many 
roosting at
the White House and in Congress.

These birds are defined as creatures who belligerently advocate violent military 
solutions to
political problems, but who dodged opportunities to serve in uniform during wartime. In
some cases, offshoots of the breed were forced into fatigues, but used influence to 
keep
them far away from the bombs and bullets. In all cases, DNA tests show the birds to be
congenital cowards in the face of fire.

As you read this, Congress is being bullied into granting aspirant world emperor George
Bush (see "Chickenhawk Headquarters" below) a blank check to go to war with Iraq and
against any other "threat" (as determined solely by those who have so, so much to gain
politically and financially from a permanent global conflict). A vote is possible as 
early as
this week.

For senators and representatives, the club cynically wielded by the White House is the
dilemma of either handing Bush what amounts to dictatorial power or being subject to
charges of lack of patriotism.

It's bullshit, of course, and morally bankrupt (do you think the Lord would bless the 
high-
altitude bombing of a city, killing tens of thousands of innocent civilians, to win an
election?).

When the vote comes in the House, Chickenhawk First Class Saxby Chambliss will salute
and help lead the charge. "I fully support the president," the goldenrod-hued Chambliss
blustered in a statement Sept. 12.

Like all chickenhawks, Chambliss believes that you should be willing, even grateful, 
to make
the supreme sacrifice so that voters will overlook a crumbling economy, 
mega-billion-dollar
thievery in corporate boardrooms, the corruption of the public sector, the gang-rape 
of the
nation's and world's environment, and, most urgently, an administration whose 
culpability
(at the very least, extraordinary negligence) in contributing to the carnage of 9-11 
becomes
more apparent with each day's headlines. Not to mention such ditties as the failure of 
the
"war against terrorism" and little blemishes like the mass-murder war crimes of our 
Afghan
allies, long reported in the world media and belatedly noted this month by the U.S. 
press in
a Newsweek report.

So, you see, a grand and spectacular war is something for which you should be willing 
to
lay down your life -- or that of your children.

But among those who Chambliss and other chickenhawks exclude from the holy privilege of
horrible death on the battlefield are, well, themselves.

Chambliss' opportunity came during the Vietnam conflict. This super-patriot, kick-ass, 
all-
American guy could have signed up and found glory in the rice paddies. Un-unh. Not 
Saxby.
He cowered behind student deferments and then a football injury to his knee (that
somehow never much interfered with his athletic endeavors).

Moreover, he wasn't exactly forthcoming about his "send the other guy" ploys, which
certainly raises questions about his integrity as he seeks to move his chickenhawk-
feathered rear end to the U.S. Senate.

The unheroic conduct "is absolutely not an issue," Chambliss has pouted, and I'm sure 
he
wishes his was the last word on the matter. In lieu of actually putting his quivering 
flesh on
the front lines, Chambliss offered the lame defense to the Chattanooga Times Free Press
that "nobody has been a stronger supporter of the men and women who wear the uniform
than Saxby Chambliss."

In other words, good ol' Saxby is steadfastly behind our soldiers and sailors -- way 
behind
them, like thousands and thousands of miles behind them. When the boys and girls come
home in body bags, Saxby will be the first to shed a tear (making sure the 
photographers
get a good shot of his sorrow).

But, since he is trying to unseat a true American war hero, Democratic Sen. Max 
Cleland,
Chambliss' yellow stripe is very much debatable. Chambliss himself elevated the squall 
to
hurricane strength when he claimed Cleland violated his oath to protect and defend
America in a 1997 vote on a chemical weapons treaty.

The senator's vote did no such thing. (At stake was a scheme by the radical Jesse 
Helms to
undermine sane disarmament. Cleland voted with a 56-44 majority that included 20 
military
heroes and 11 Republicans.)

More important, for Chambliss to challenge Cleland's patriotism is just pure odorous 
offal.

It's not that I totally agree with Cleland. Indeed, while many Democrats have expressed
skepticism, concern and outrage at Bush's ultimatum, Cleland last week generally 
supported
the congressional resolution -- but laudably added that he opposed unilateral U.S. 
action.
That's wise considering what Bush seeks is much broader power (endless war) than his
dad had in 1990 or that even LBJ achieved via the Gulf of Tonkin resolution.

I wish Cleland -- like his former boss, Jimmy Carter -- had urged that America cease 
being
a rogue power, and stop threatening "first strike" holocaust to any nation that 
challenges
our imperial will.

Saddam Hussein is a loathsome human being. But every argument for invading Iraq
(inevitably leading to the need to assert ourselves militarily in a series of wars) 
falls before
real evidence. (See Web links below.) Bush has repeatedly dealt in fears, ignorance and
falsehoods to stampede the nation into war. Cleland should have confronted that.

At least, however, the senator has a lifetime of honor, and his position deserves 
respect.
He knows what battle means.

Chickenhawk Headquarters

There's no shortage of chickenhawks in Washington and in the bellicose blowhards in the
media. Here's a sampling:

George W. Bush. Dubya lied repeatedly in the 2000 campaign about his "service" in the
Texas Air National Guard. The truth is that his family's influence got him into the 
Guard,
jumping over about 100,000 men on the waiting list. Once in, he disappeared from duty 
--
in military jargon, he went AWOL. And, documents show that he fibbed when he claimed he
volunteered for overseas duty -- he specifically refused to volunteer. See:
www.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=165

Dick Cheney. He, too, could have served in Vietnam, but claims he "had other 
priorities."

John Ashcroft. He was engaged in a nationally critical pursuit of teaching business 
education
during Vietnam.

Administration insiders: Spencer Abraham, Elliott Abrams, Ken Adelman, John Bolton (the
most "kill 'em all" fellow at the State Department), Andrew Card, Asa Hutchinson, 
Richard
Perle (leader of the War Party and advocate of regime-changing wars throughout the
Middle East), Harvey Pitt (corporate scandal cover-up guy), Paul Wolfowitz 
(vice-leader of
the War Party, who bellows for military dominance of most of Eurasia).

Presidential anointers: Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas.

Sampling of other pols: Lamar Alexander, Tennessee ex-governor, now running for U.S.
Senate; soon-to-be ex-Congressman Bob Barr; Florida Gov. Jeb Bush; Rep. Tom DeLay, R-
Texas; ex-Speaker Newt Gingrich; Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas; current Speaker Dennis
Hastert; Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.; Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala.

Bloodthirsty pundits: Roger Ailes (Fox), Wolf Blitzer (CNN), Sean Hannity (Fox), 
Charles
Krauthammer (columnist), Bill O'Reilly (Fox), George Will (columnist). And Atlanta's 
own
beloved Neal Boortz (WSB radio; he claims his eyes kept him from flying, but he showed 
no
enthusiasm to join the infantry)

Two others are worth noting.

Generally women don't make the chickenhawk list. But blood-and-guts Barbie doll 
columnist
Ann Coulter, who (among other atrocities) has advocated killing all Arab leaders and
forcibly converting their citizens to Christianity, is in the age bracket of Desert 
Storm
veterans. Needless to say, she never risked her own behind.

And, my personal favorite is the Most Devilishly Rev. Pat Robertson, who wants to see
Armageddon erupt in the Middle East so he can ascend to the Heavenly Throne and tell 
The
Big Guy what's what. Robertson was a lieutenant during Korea, but his daddy, a U.S.
senator, ensured that when his unit went to battle, Pat had duty that kept him in 
Japan.

For more information on why the imminent war in Iraq is illegal, and on the Bush
administration's lies about the conflict, see:

www.sundayherald.com/print27735 -- details how the "regime change" was planned long
before Bush was elected.

www.counterpunch.org/ gorman0913.html -- Bush's half-truths, outright falsehoods and
illogical statements in his Sept. 12 address to the United Nations.

www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020930&s=zunes -- Excellent article in The Nation that
rebuts the eight principal arguments put forward by Bush for invading Iraq. Also, at
www.thenation.com are links to protest against the war.

www.antiwar.com -- A Libertarian (as opposed to Boortz's statism masquerading as L-ism)
website.

Lest you forget, Senior Editor John Sugg is also 7th District Congressional candidate 
John F.
Sugg. You know Sugg is neither a chicken nor a hawk. Contact him at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or at 404-614-1241.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; I don't believe everything I read or send
(but that doesn't stop me from considering it; obviously SOMEBODY thinks it's 
important)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without 
charge or
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of 
information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth
shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to