-Caveat Lector- > The US on the other did a much better job of ethnic cleansing of the > previous inhabitants of the US, and those they missed, they relocated > forcibly to "reservations."
And your point is? BTW, most (90%) of the American Indiginous died as a result of European disease for which they had no immunity. This happened long before the US even existed. Of course the reduced remainder were more vulnerable to ethnic cleansing later on. Perhaps there is a lesson here for the Sharoniks - kill most of the Palestinians off with some kind of germ warfare. Then it will be easier to get rid of the those who survive. > Any way my point was fairly clear I thought. I am against forced relocation. > On the other hand, at least they are being relocated from one part of > Palestine to another. There wouldn¹t have to be any refugee camps, if the > Hashemite Jordanians weren't oppressing their Palestinian majority, and not > allowing their relatives from western Palestine settle in eastern Palestine. > Maybe they think that letting all these radicalized Palestinians back into > Palestine would turn attention to their illegitimate British created rule, > and put in a legitimate Palestinian state (gasp) what a concept. Or maybe > they just like having a fist to use against Israel. Again what is the point? You seem to lament that Jordan doesn't encourage all the W Bank and Gaza Palestinians to immigrate to Jordan. Your statements about Jordan, etc. imply lip service to the Sharonites' evil ideology that all Palestinians must be driven off to some other Arab country or that those Palestinians would love to move to Jordan but the bad Hasshemites won't let them come. Unfortunately that is a red herring since most of the Palestinians who live in Gaza and W Bank consider THAT their homeland. Why should they have to 'transferred' (such a nice antiseptic term!) to anyplace? By your logic, Israelis whose families came from Europe after WWII should be taken back by those European countries. Back to Poland, Russia, Germany, etc. That would go a long way to 'solving' the problem, wouldn't it? flw <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
