-Caveat Lector- >From http://www.canoe.ca/Columnists/margolis_oct27.html
October 27, 2002 U.S. should be targeting North Korea By ERIC MARGOLIS -- Contributing Foreign Editor Never trust the "axis of evil." When U.S. President George W. Bush threatened to invade Iraq if it didn't re-admit UN arms inspectors, that tricky Saddam Hussein immediately agreed, leaving the Bush administration gnashing its teeth in frustration. If the UN didn't give him a green light to again bomb Iraq back to the Stone Age, Bush thundered - with stunning illogic - he would ignore the UN Security Council and take action unilaterally. This was the very same Bush who had a few days earlier vowed to invade Iraq because it was ignoring the Security Council. As that tragic farce was unfolding, a new bombshell went off when another tricky member of Bush's axis of evil, North Korea, revealed it had nuclear weapons. Now, the CIA has known since 1993 that North Korea had at least two nuclear weapons and 5,000 tons of poison gas and germs, plus the missiles and artillery to deliver them against Seoul, the 37,000 U.S. troops in South Korea, all of Japan, and U.S. bases in Okinawa and Guam. Readers of this column have also known since 1993 that North Korea had weapons of mass destruction. Since then, I've written half a dozen columns - the latest on Aug. 11 - pointing out the utter illogic of whipping up hysteria over impotent Iraq while denying the very real threat to South Koreans, Americans and Japanese from a well-armed and highly dangerous North Korea. Back in 1993-4, faced with the choice of removing North Korea's weapons of mass destruction through war, or pretending they didn't exist, Bill Clinton chose to buy North Korea's silence with $4 billion U.S. in oil, food and nuclear reactors. The Bush administration followed this see-no-evil policy until the recent hugely embarrassing nuclear revelation from North Korea. And what was Bush's response? He lamely called for "tough negotiations" with North Korea. This from the same president who absolutely refuses any negotiations with Iraq over the very same issue. So the administration is rushing plans to invade Iraq, which has zero offensive capability, while calling for talks with North Korea, which has 100 intermediate- range No-dong missiles pointed at South Korea, Japan, and U.S. Pacific bases, 100,000 crack troops whose mission is to launch suicide assaults on all American military bases in the region, and is about to deploy an ICBM that can deliver a nuclear warhead to the continental United States. Glaring contradiction Confronted by this glaring contradiction, a flustered Bush claimed war against Iraq was necessary because Saddam was a "uniquely evil" dictator who had gassed his own people. North Korea's "Dear Leader," Kim Jong-il, with his alarming bouffant hairdo, pot belly, and weird, khaki jumpsuits, looks and acts like an alien from outer space. His Stalinist regime, with whom Bush wants to negotiate, has just allowed two million of its citizens to starve to death in order to amply feed and supply the Communist party and the military, and conduct secret nuclear and missile programs. Hundreds of thousands of North Koreans are in prison camps. North Korea has kidnapped Japanese citizens, bombed civilian airliners and committed many other acts of aggression and terrorism. As for Saddam gassing his own people - meaning Kurdish rebels during the Iran-Iraq war - Bush's outrage is brazen hypocrisy. The U.S. and Britain supplied Iraq with its chemical and biological weapons, financed Saddam's aggression against Iran and made no protests when Saddam used such weapons. Rather than calling for war against Iraq for events that occurred in the 1980s, President Bush would do well to do something about the use by his closest ally, Israel, of U.S.- supplied tanks, helicopter gunships, ground attack aircraft and heavy anti-tank missiles against Palestinian civilians, a clear violation of American laws which forbid the use of U.S. weapons against civilians. No oil in North Korea Why does Bush continue to fulminate against Iraq while pussyfooting around North Korea? Because North Korea has no oil and is not the target of powerful U.S. domestic lobbies. As former New York Times columnist Anthony Lewis writes, where would Bush, who has "the most dismal record of any president in memory," be without his Iraqi crusade? Facing soaring deficits, financial scandals, and a world that sees his bellicose administration, led by a cabal of Pentagon Dr. Strangeloves, rather than Iraq, as a real international menace. The Pentagon estimates it can crush Iraq's feeble armed forces in a week and totally occupy the nation in 30 days with only modest casualties. Bush's jolly little war in Iraq promises to be short and, he hopes, sweet. North Korea is a different matter. The North has a tough, million-man army that has considerable defensive power in spite of obsolete equipment. North Korea has repeatedly threatened to "burn" Seoul and its seven million inhabitants, as well as the U.S. 2nd Infantry Division on the DMZ, with chemical and perhaps biological weapons. In 1993, the Pentagon estimated that a full-scale war with North Korea would cost U.S. forces 250,000 casualties. Better to create a straw bogeyman in Baghdad, reckons George Bush, and then triumphantly knock it down, than to tangle with those scary North Koreans. Eric can be reached by e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Letters to the editor should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit his home page. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A<>E<>R + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Forwarded as information only; I don't believe everything I read or send (but that doesn't stop me from considering it; obviously SOMEBODY thinks it's important) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut." --- Ernest Hemingway <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
