> P'raps after settling switching it around to #ifndef NO_EWMH rather > than #ifdef EWMH. On the theory that it gets us closer to "normal > builds require no -D's".
On letting it stew around my brain a while, I've decided that's just silly. The double negative doesn't read as well, and doesn't really fit this use case that well anyway. And I'll config.h-ify things at some point anyway, removing the spectre of -D-pileup. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [email protected] Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
